Analytics Exercise Assignment

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Can you help me understand this Social Media Marketing question?

This assignment will provide you with an opportunity to examine a company’s analytical data and decide if its current social media marketing strategy can be improved.

Review the SNHU Pet Supply Case Study and the data provided. Based on the information, describe the elements of the social media strategy that have been successful and those that have not been successful, and explain why. You will be using the content you create here as part of Milestone Two, which is due in Module Five.

For additional details, please refer to the Module Three Analytics Exercise Guidelines and Rubric document.BBA 3651-18T-3A20-S3, Leadership How can a vision for organizational leadership and performance work while at a distance
Can you help me understand this Business question?

Instructions

Locate a peer-reviewed article that discusses how leaders must have a vision when leading an organization globally. Topic ideas include visionary leadership, global leadership, and international leadership. Note that these are ideas; please expand within the parameters of research used within organizations.

Respond to the following questions/topics:
Summarize the article with an eye on the author’s main point. How does this article contribute to contemporary thinking about global leadership? How does this article illustrate the importance of having a vision to lead members globally within an organization? Include communication tools and techniques of sharing that vision. How can information in this article be applied to your field? What is your opinion on the topic of this article?
Your APA-formatted response must be a minimum of two pages in length (not including the title page and the references page). Your sources should be peer-reviewed. All sources used must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.Chobani as a Social Enterprise (2 PARAGRAPHS): assignment help philadelphia
I’m trying to learn for my Business class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Using information from the readings and class discussion, what elements of social enterprise does Chobani illustrate? Are there any areas where the company does not meet the definition of a social enterprise?

Keep your response to 2 paragraphs (8-12 sentences).

Reflection Journal Rubric

Reflection Journal Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleted post on designated subjectPost is complete and on-topic; post does not contain significant errors or typos.
30.0 pts

Complete
25.0 pts

Mostly complete
20.0 pts

Incomplete/partial
15.0 pts

Insufficient

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThoroughness and detailPost explains concepts and ideas, uses examples and reflects time and effort by the writer.
25.0 pts

Excellent
22.5 pts

Good
20.0 pts

Fair
17.5 pts

Poor

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy and relevancePost fully addresses relevant topics and questions; post is logical and makes sense.
25.0 pts

Excellent
22.5 pts

Good
20.0 pts

Fair
17.5 pts

Poor

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality and creativityPost reflects original ideas, and personal reflection and consideration.
20.0 pts

Excellent
18.0 pts

Good
16.0 pts

Fair
14.0 pts

Needs Improvement

20.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0week 3 bu329 assignment 1: nursing case study help
I need an explanation for this Management question to help me study.

Unit 3 Assignment 1
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 75 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload
Instructions

Union Railroad has been using dynamic project management teams to drive their ongoing process improvement initiatives now for almost two years. Union has recently completed a benchmarking activity around the use of these teams and their performance against other peer organizations. As part of this study, they realized that they have not actually been measuring, monitoring, and motivating some of the teams as much as they could have.

Union has decided to hire you to come in and improve this deficiency. They have asked that you analyze their situation and discuss how they might incorporate the six key team behaviors into their process. Especially they want you to prepare a 1-2 page report that discusses your thoughts and approach to leveraging these six key team behaviors and how through their use they can achieve better measurement of performance, monitoring, and motivational aspects within their team environment.

Estimated time to complete: 8 hours

Rubric

BU329 Unit 3 Assignment 1

BU329 Unit 3 Assignment 1
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
7.5 pts

Level 5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.
6.75 pts

Level 4

Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.
6.0 pts

Level 3

Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.
5.25 pts

Level 2

Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.
4.5 pts

Level 1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.
0.0 pts

Level 0

Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or ViewsBU329-CO2
7.5 pts

Level 5

Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).
6.75 pts

Level 4

Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.
6.0 pts

Level 3

Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.
5.25 pts

Level 2

Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(s) are identified.
4.5 pts

Level 1

Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches
0.0 pts

Level 0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
18.5 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
16.65 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed
14.8 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
12.95 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
11.1 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.
0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

18.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-I
18.5 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
16.65 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
14.8 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
12.95 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.
11.1 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.
0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

18.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
7.5 pts

Level 5

Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.
6.75 pts

Level 4

Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.
6.0 pts

Level 3

Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.
5.25 pts

Level 2

Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.
4.5 pts

Level 1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.
0.0 pts

Level 0

States an illogical conclusion from findings.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications
7.5 pts

Level 5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.
6.75 pts

Level 4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.
6.0 pts

Level 3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.
5.25 pts

Level 2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.
4.5 pts

Level 1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.
0.0 pts

Level 0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
4.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
3.6 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
3.2 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
2.8 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
2.4 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
4.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
3.6 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3.2 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
2.8 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
2.4 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

4.0 pts

Total Points: 75.0

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services