Accounting homework help

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Accounting homework help. Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester T1 2020
Unit Code HA2011
Unit Title Management Accounting
Assessment Type Group Assignment
(Report format)
Assessment Title Performance Measurement Systems – Implementation of the Balanced Score
Card (BSC)
Purpose of the
assessment (with
ULO Mapping)
In this group based assessment, students will demonstrate their knowledge and
apply the key themes and concepts from the topic in Week 9 – Performance
Measurement Systems, particularly the “Balanced Score Card.” This is also an
opportunity for students to extend their current knowledge by engaging in
additional research of the topic.
Based on the Unit Learning outcomes, students are required to:
 Appraise how pricing decisions are made (ULO 3)
 Calculate both return on investment and residual income and explain how
each method is used (ULO 4)
 Implement systems to plan and control business operations (ULO 7)
Weight 30% of the total assessments
Total Marks 30 Marks
Word limit Not more than 3,000 words
Due Date Week 10, Friday 11:59 pm (AEST)
Late submission incurs penalties of 5 (five) % of the assessment value per
calendar day unless an extension and/or special consideration has been
granted by the interactive tutor prior to the assessment deadline.
Page 2 of 6
HA2011 Management Accounting Group Assignment T1 2020
Submission
Guidelines
• Students should complete the assignment in groups of 3 – 5 students.
Students must self-enrol the membership of their groups before the end of
week 8.
• All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a
completed Holmes Assignment Cover Page.
• The assignment must be in MS Word format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and
2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings
and page numbers.
• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style.
• Note – All assignments must be submitted through safe-assign in order to be
assessed for similarity. Assignments which have not been firstly submitted
through safe-assign will not be marked and graded. If you are unsure about
using safe-assign, plagiarism and the similarity percentages in the report, you
should consult with your interactive tutor.
Assignment Specifications
Purpose
In this group assignment, students will need to work in co-operative groups, demonstrate their
knowledge and understanding of the topic through active online discussion and then apply this
knowledge through group collaboration to a unique publically listed company from the ASX. Students
will need to apply critical and analytical thinking skills and then compose a group report for final
submission.
Background
You were recently employed as a management accountant in a listed firm on the ASX. The Managing
Director of your company has formed a small taskforce to explore the possibility of implementing a
Balanced Score Card (BSC) system in the company. You are assigned to work with others in the
taskforce due to your management accounting background.
Required
Your group is required to prepare a report to provide advice on the suitability of the BSC for an ASXlisted company, which is selected by your group. The company selected must be “unique” and it is
NOT allowed to be the same as another group.
NOTE – You must check your selected ASX listed company on shared excel sheet. If the company has
already been selected, then you must go back and select another ASX listed company.
Page 3 of 6
HA2011 Management Accounting Group Assignment T1 2020
The report must cover the following key points:
a) A description of your company.
b) Calculation of Return on Investment (using net profit divided by total assets) and a discussion of
the ways to improve ROI.
c) A description of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and its key components.
d) A description of the ways the implementation of the BSC can improve the competitive
advantage(s) of your company.
e) A discussion and conclusion of the overall suitability of BSC to your selected company.
Assignment Structure
The report should include the following components:
• Assignment cover page clearly stating your name and student number (Use Holmes Template)
• An executive summary and table of contents (note executive summary must be before the
table of contents)
• A brief Introduction or overview of what the report is about.
• Body of the report with sections to answer the above issues and with appropriate section
headings
• Conclusion
• List of References based on the Harvard referencing style
• Appendix including your supporting material and Assignment Participation Table (as below)
NOT – The report should be grounded on relevant academic literature and all references must be properly
cited and included in the reference list.
To ensure that all students participate equitably in the group assignment and that students are responsible for
the academic integrity of all components of the assignment, all groups need to include a table which identifies
which student/students are responsible for the various sections of the assignment and include it in their
report, right before the executive summary.
Assignment Participation Table
Assignment Section Student/Students
Note:
This table needs to be completed and submitted with the assignment as it is a compulsory component required
before any grading is undertaken.
Page 4 of 6
HA2011 Management Accounting Group Assignment T1 2020
Marking Criteria
Marking criteria Weighting
Description of the Chosen Company 3%
Calculation of Return on Investment (Using Net Profit Divided by Total Assets) and
a Discussion of the Ways to Improve ROI.
6%
Description of the BSC and its Features. 6%
Description of the Ways the Implementation of BSC Can Improve the Competitive
Advantage(s) of the selected Company.
6%
Discussion on the Suitability of BSC to the Chosen Company. 3%
Report Presentation 3%
Research Quality and compliance with Harvard referencing conventions 3%
TOTAL Weight 30%
Marking Rubric
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Description of the
Chosen
Company
/Max 3 Marks
An excellent
description of the
chosen company
3 Marks
A very good
description of the
chosen company
2.5 Marks
A good
description of the
chosen company
2 Marks
An adequate
description of the
chosen company
1.5 Marks
A poor or
incomplete
description of the
chosen company
1-0 Mark
Calculation of
Return on
Investment and a
Discussion of the
Ways to Improve
ROI.
/ Max 6 Marks
Demonstrate an
excellent
calculation of
Return on
Investment and a
discussion of the
ways to improve
ROI.
6 Marks
Demonstrate a
very good
calculation of
Return on
Investment and
a discussion of
the ways to
improve ROI.
5 Marks
Demonstrate a
good calculation
of Return on
Investment and a
discussion of the
ways to improve
ROI.
4 Marks
Demonstrate an
adequate
calculation of
Return on
Investment and
a discussion of
the ways to
improve ROI.
3 Marks
Unable to
demonstrate an
adequate
calculation of
Return on
Investment and a
discussion of the
ways to improve
ROI.
1 -2 Marks
Page 5 of 6
HA2011 Management Accounting Group Assignment T1 2020
Description of
the BSC and its
Features.
/ Max 6 Marks
Demonstrate an
excellent
understanding of
the description of
the BSC and its
features.
6 Marks
Demonstrate a
very good
understanding of
the description of
the BSC and its
features.
5 Marks
Demonstrate a
good
understanding of
the description of
the BSC and its
features.
4 Marks
Demonstrate an
adequate
understanding of
the description of
the BSC and its
features.
3 Marks
Unable to
demonstrate an
understanding of
the description of
the BSC and its
features.
1 -2 Marks
Ways the
Implementation
of BSC Improves
the Competitive
Advantage(s) of
the Chosen
Company.
/ Max 6 Marks
Present an
excellent
discussion of the
ways the
implementation
of BSC improves
the competitive
advantage(s) of
the chosen
company.
6 Marks
Present a very
good discussion
of the ways the
implementation
of BSC improves
the competitive
advantage(s) of
the chosen
company.
5 Marks
Present a good
discussion of the
ways the
implementation
of BSC improves
the competitive
advantage(s) of
the chosen
company.
4 Marks
Present a
reasonable
discussion of the
ways the
implementation
of BSC improves
the competitive
advantage(s) of
the chosen
company.
3 Marks
Unable to
present a proper
discussion of the
ways the
implementation
of BSC improves
the competitive
advantage(s) of
the chosen
company.
1 -2 Marks
Discussion of
Suitability of
BSC to the
Chosen
Company.
/Max 3 Marks
Present an
excellent
discussion of the
suitability of BSC
to the chosen
company.
3 Marks
Present a very
good discussion
of the suitability
of BSC to the
chosen company.
2.5 Marks
Present a good
discussion of the
suitability of BSC
to the chosen
company.
2 Marks
Present a
reasonable
discussion of the
suitability of BSC
to the chosen
company.
1.5 Marks
Unable to
present a proper
discussion of the
suitability of BSC
to the chosen
company.
1-0 Mark
Page 6 of 6
HA2011 Management Accounting Group Assignment T1 2020
Presentation
/Max 3 Marks
Report included
all elements and
was very well
presented.
Writing flowed
clearly and
sections were
linked very
effectively.
Referencing was
exemplary.
English was used
very effectively
and was error
free.
3 Marks
Report included
all elements and
was well
presented.
Writing flowed
clearly and
sections were
linked effectively.
Referencing was
of a high
standard. English
was used
effectively with
very few errors
present.
2.5 Marks
Report included
all elements and
was generally
presented
appropriately.
Writing mostly
flowed well and
sections were
linked.
Referencing was
in accordance
with guidelines.
English was used
effectively with
few errors
present.
2 Marks
Report included
most elements
and was
adequately
presented.
Writing
sometimes did
not flow clearly
leaving the paper
to seem
disjointed in
areas.
Referencing was
somewhat in
accordance with
guidelines. Basic
English was used
with some errors
present.
1.5 Marks
Report lacked
some elements
and was poorly
presented.
Writing often did
not flow clearly
leaving the paper
to seem
somewhat
disjointed.
Referencing was
not entirely in
accordance with
relevant
guidelines. Basic
English was used
with errors
present.
1-0 Mark
Research Quality
/Max 3 Marks
An extensive
amount of highquality evidence
from peerreviewed journal
articles and
other sources
was included and
used effectively
to support
discussion.
3 Marks
A broad range of
quality peerreviewed journal
references and
other sources
was included and
used effectively
to support
discussion.
2.5 Marks
An adequate
range of peerreviewed journal
references was
included and
used to support
discussion.
2 Marks
An adequate
range of peerreviewed journal
references was
included and
used to a basic
extent to support
discussion.
1.5 Marks
Little or no peerreviewed journal
references were
included, and
these were rarely
used to support
discussion
effectively.
1-0 M
Accounting homework help

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services