Absolutely No Plagiarism!

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m trying to study for my Social Science course and I need some help to understand this question.

Assignment 3: Public Administrative Environments /Managing People through Change

Due Week 8 and worth 280 points

The City Manager has hired you as the Chief of Staff for your local government and has contacted you regarding the following issues concerning various governmental departments and external stakeholders:

Issue 1:

In the past year, citizen, department, and outside stakeholder complaints have been filed against the Department of Health administrators. Such complaints cited unprofessional leadership, unethical practices, insufficient customer and patient care, poor fire and emergency response time, and inability to implement change and resolve conflict within and amongst subordinates and staff. The Department of Health is composed of the following agencies:

·Social Services,

·Fire and Emergency Management, and

·Human Services.

Issue 2:

The School Board has a collaborative relationship with various government departments. In the last two (2) months, the School Board has charged department directors with failure to work collaboratively with the School Board on its efforts to:

·Meet federal mandates regarding reformation of new policy issues that will impact the leadership of the Department of Redevelopment and Housing, the State Department of Education, and the State Department of Housing and Urban Development.

·Support the academic leadership of secondary school principals by providing specific student data from the Department of Juvenile Relations, in an attempt to improve student retention and performance toward increasing graduation rates.

Note: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.

Write a seven to eight (7-8) page paper in which you address the following:

1.What would you do to deal with scenarios 1 and 2 as Chief of Staff? Provide a rationale to support your response.

2.What policies and practices would you change? Recommend one (1) specific leadership theory and two (2) public leader styles that would be most beneficial for the School Board in addressing the issues presented. Provide a rationale for your response.

3.Determine the essential manner in which the leadership from the Department of Public Health, the School Board, and the various other government departments impact the leadership of the City Manager and his or her ability to carry out government operations.

4.What would you do to lead the local government unit moving forward?

5.Include at least four (4) peer-reviewed references (no more than 6 months old) from material outside the textbook. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and government websites. Wikipedia, other wikis, and any other websites ending in anything other than “.gov” do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

·Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

·Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.Project on car manufacturing firm: assignment help online
I don’t know how to handle this Computer Science question and need guidance.

***************************************APA FORMAT*****************************************

*******************************NO PLAGARISM********************************************

***********************SATISFY BELOW MENTIONED TASKS*************************

********************* 5 – 7 PAGES*********************************************************

CASE STUDY TOPIC: CAR MANUFACTURING FIRM

Conduct a brief, preliminary review of your case study’s organization. This review should include business mission and general purpose of data in support of mission-critical information systems. Produce detailed data requirements to address the data needs of your organization. The following are criteria that you can use to organize your requirements: adaptability, business and organizational policies, change control demands, compatibility, completeness, consistency, currency, ease of use, evolution, extensibility, functional features, maintainability/manageability, performance, reliability, scalability, security, standards, support, testability, and ubiquity. You will produce requirements in at least five of the above criteria. Develop a detailed data model as an EER diagram for your case study. Your model will include entity types with attributes, primary keys, and foreign keys as needed, and pertinent relationships with cardinality and integrity constraints as needed. Your data model will also come with a brief description for each entity type, attribute and relationship. Make sure to satisfy yourself that your data model is reasonably complex as explained in the guidelines under Background of Enterprise Data: Selecting your Case Study abovePJM440 MOD3 Portfolio MIle Stone 4 Page Essay APA Format
I need an explanation for this Management question to help me study.

I have attached the below in a Word DOX. as formatting can be lost. I have also attached the MOD8 Portfolio Project in a Word DOX. for your reference.
Portfolio Milestone (100 Points)
Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.
Option #1: Quality Management and Small Cell Infrastructure Design
Go to Module 8 and read the expectations for Option 1, then return here for your Module 3 Milestone effort.

In Module 3, you are asked as a first step, to familiarize yourself with the Small Cell Infrastructure Design Guidelines. Note that two contract firms were instrumental in the development of the guidelines: Clanton & Associates, Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group. After your review of the guidelines, you are asked to provide your input to the following:
Are the current Small Cell Infrastructure Design Guidelines (SCIDG) ones that promote high quality? If yes, how? If no, why not and what should change to promote quality? Support your position with specific references to the SCIDG or current scholarly documentation. What do you interpret to be meant by “quality” from the perspective of the public works personnel, communications companies deploying small cell infrastructure, the contract companies involved, and the public both now and in the future? What support do you have for your position with specific references to the SCIDG or current scholarly documentation? What are the drivers for change, and the barriers to change from the perspective of the public works personnel and the public? Are there competing drivers for change that may impact quality from the public’s perspective? Support your position with specific references to the SCIDG or current scholarly documentation.
Submission:
Write a paper addressing the Module 3 Milestone questions for the case of The Department of Public Works, Engineering Division for the City and County of regarding the Small Cell Infrastructure Design Guidelines and quality management. Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length, not including the required title and references pages and any appendix if required. For more information see “How do I do an Appendix in APA style?” (Links to an external site.) Support the Milestone paper with a minimum of three current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library. This is in addition to any course textbooks, lecture material you decide to use, or the case itself. Of course, you may always exceed the minimum number of sources. Format the paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.). Be clear, concise, and focused.
Option #2: Total quality management and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) on Federal Retirements
Go to Module 8 and read the expectations for Option 2, then return here for your Module 3 Milestone effort.

In Module 3, you are asked as a first step, to familiarize yourself with the Government Accounting Office (GAO), Office of Personnel Management (OPM) May of 2019, publication of the Federal Retirement: OPM Actions Needed to Improve Application Processing Times. After your review of the guidelines, you are asked to provide your input to the following:
Is the current Federal Retirement: OPM Actions Needed to Improve Application Processing Times document one that promotes high quality? If yes, how? If no, why not and what should change to promote quality? Support your position with specific references to the GAO report or current scholarly documentation. What do you interpret to be meant by “quality” from the perspective of the GAO OPM, retirees, Congressional leaders, and the public both now and in the future? What support do you have for your position with specific references to the GAO report or current scholarly documentation? What are the drivers for change, and the barriers to change from the perspective of the GAO OPM, retirees, Congressional leaders, and the public? Are there competing drivers for change that may impact quality from the public’s perspective? Support your position with specific references to the GAO report or current scholarly documentation.
Submission:
Write a paper addressing the Module 3 Milestone questions for the case of federal employee retirement situation and quality management. Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length, not including the required title and references pages and any appendix if required. For more information see “How do I do an Appendix in APA style?” (Links to an external site.) Support the Milestone paper with a minimum of three current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library. This is in addition to any course textbooks, lecture material you decide to use, the GAO report or the case itself. Of course, you may always exceed the minimum number of sources. Format the paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.). Be clear, concise, and focused.
Rubric

PJM440 Mod 3 PM

PJM440 Mod 3 PM
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis

20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services