Ableism Reflection Essay

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I need support with this English question so I can learn better.

Watch the PBS segment on Georgia’s segregation of students with disabilities, and address the following:
What might be the state of Georgia’s rationale for this practice? Other than the obvious, horrific examples given in the video, how could such segregation be damaging to students with disabilities? How might the state of Georgia address this issue? Remember to take into account their possible rationale for the practice.Reflection Paper
I need an explanation for this English question to help me study.

Briefly reflect on your general education capstone experience and address the following questions:
What are the key takeaways from this class that you will carry with you? What did it take to bring your paper and presentation together, and how has that experience shaped your professional outlook? What recommendations or advice would you provide for students who will take this capstone course in the future?
Your paper should be 1/2–1 page in length.Analyse the socio-cultural and political-economic causes of political corruption in Southeast Asia and how Southeast Asian countries can tackle political corruption.: nursing coursework help
I’m trying to learn for my Political Science class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

According to Transparency International, it is natural to think of elections when we think of political corruption. People or organisations with their own agendas can skew voting. However, political corruption is not just about election rigging. It has significant impacts on politicians and the public.

Analyse the socio-cultural and political-economic causes of political corruption in Southeast Asia and how Southeast Asian countries can tackle political corruption.

1000 word limit

1. 80% of the marks are allocated to the content of your answers:

 The marks awarded to what your answers cover depend on the extent to which they cover the key points that correctly and comprehensively address each question.

 The key points should be supported by evidence drawn from course materials and, wherever relevant, from other credible sources.

2. 20% of the marks are allocated to the presentation of your answers: Wherever applicable, the marks awarded to how your answers are presented depend on the extent to which your answers:

 form a sound reasoning by developing those key points in a clear, logical and succinct manner;

 provide proper and adequate in-text citations and referencing to content drawn from course materials and other credible sources;

 strictly follow APA formatting and style guidelines1, in particular for: • in-text citations and end-of-report references; • the identification of figures and tables;

 use, wherever relevant, the specialised vocabulary and terminology commonly used in discussions about the topic(s) covered by each question;

 provide a reference or bibliography at the end of the main report;

 include the less relevant details in an Appendix;

 use sentence constructions that are grammatically and syntactically correct;

 are free from spelling mistakes; present the workings, numerical formulations and results in a logical manner that follows the APA formatting and style guidelines;

 design and present graphs, diagrams and plots that follow the APA formatting and style guidelines;

 are highly original;

 have proper formatting, which may: • include a properly formatted cover page; • respect the answer length/word count set out in the assignment guidelines, if any is prescribed; • present answers in paragraphs with proper spacing and page margins; • include page numbers and appendices, if necessary.linguistic question: nursing homework help
Can you help me understand this Linguistics question?

two parts of questions, here is the detail

Part B: Islands

Identify what kind of island is violated in the following sentences:

(11)

*Which house did Sally ask who bought?

compare: Sally asked who bought WHAT?

(12)

*What did your brother buy a guitar and sell?

compare: Your brother bought a guitar and sold WHAT?

(13)

*Who did they agree with the claim that the police should arrest?

compare: They agreed with the claim that the police should arrest WHO?

(14)

*Who should that Mary hired have surprised you?

compare: That Mary hired WHO should have surprised you?Revision Letters
I need support with this English question so I can learn better.

After you have read and understood assignment instructions read here:

Make sure you follow all of the instructions for the format of these letters, I have attached the three think pieces to this assignment that must be read, there are three different letters you must write. Remember to treat the format LIKE A LETTER.

The writer’s names for the piece are Cassidy, Mickey, and Eric. So make sure to start off with Dear Cassidy, etc.

You will comment on three peers’ papers and write a letter to each of your three assigned peers to upload here. Each letter should be no less than 250 words. The letters will provide feedback to the peer about how to improve their Think Piece. You will consider what any reader would consider. Things such as if you can follow the writer’s thinking, whether the piece is interesting, whether you found the essay interesting, whether the structure felt logical and easy to follow, any issues that you would normally consider when reading an essay.

But on top of that you will look at the piece based on what you’ve learned this semester, and what you know from writing your own TPs.

First, read your peer’s paper and comment throughout with the comment tools and pointers that I’ve used when responding to your TPs

Second, look again at your peer’s paper carefully, takes notes about issues, places you have questions, sentences you stumble on or have to re-read. Again, insert questions, highlight in some way the places your stumbled or got lost.

Third, write a letter for each of your peers either in a separate document and upload it as an attachment.

Here are the steps to follow to write that letter:
Write a brief paragraph first that gives your initial, general reactions of the paper. You can give some praise, but also a critical initial reaction. You are trying to help your peer improve. Just saying that the paper is “good” is not helpful. Now consider the notes you took, and the places where you commented. What THREE writerly issues can your peer work on. In other words, did you mostly comment on feeling lost? Suggest concrete ways your peer could help the reader follow, a stronger and earlier thesis or purpose statement, places to develop, questions to answer, better ways to organize the paragraphs. If you mostly commented on structure? Suggest transitions and metadiscourse to add, ways to help the reader move from idea to idea. Did you mostly comment on the tone of the paper? Suggest real ways that the peer might reword areas for clarity, ways to take out a too-stuffy or too-casual tone. Did you comment a lot on clarity? Point out the moments that didn’t make sense, suggest ways to reword, suggest things like “what I think you meant is…” Did you comment mostly on details? Suggest places where the peer could provide more description, areas where you needed more explanation, places you wrote “Huh?” For each of those issues that you believe need improvement, write a fully developed paragraph with real, usable ways for your peer to revise and improve.
Hint: For EVERY criticism or point that you make, provide an example or point to a specific area in the essay that illustrates your criticism.

Hint: For EVERY criticism and illustration, provide a concrete and specific way to improve. That might be rewriting a sentence or two, rewriting the thesis, suggesting paragraphs that might be moved around, and writing some transitional or topic sentences for your peer.
Write a nice concluding paragraph that sums up your criticisms and gives your peer some sort of motivational push to improve. Read over your letter and look for errors and places that could be clarified. Read over your letter again and consider that if YOU received this letter you would know exact ways to improve your essay.
I have attached each piece to the assignment

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services