How can social networks strengthen economic disadvantage?

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Learning Goal: I’m working on a sociology practice test / quiz and need support to help me learn.For this final project, you will have to analyze an economic debate, process, or institution through a sociological perspective. Your project should address one and only one of the following prompts and use a case as evidence for your argument:1. Is economic inequality inevitable?2. How can organizations reduce the role of class, gender, and/or race in reproducing internal inequalities?3. Are markets necessarily and inevitably problematic?4. How can social networks strengthen economic disadvantage?5. Is meritocracy impossible?To address these prompts, you will have to combine sociological arguments from the videos, readings, and assignments with an original empirical case of your choice. A case refers to an identifiable event or process that is documented and that you can analyze as a relevant example associated to your argument. The current economic/heath crisis would be an example of ‘a case’; an organization or institution would also be an example of ‘a case’; personal experiences, as documented through interviews, would also be an example of ‘a case’; a heated discussion on Reddit is also a ‘case’.In your project, you should really endeavor to use the sociological concepts and discussions from the course’s reading list. You can write, for example, on the reproduction of social capital, the importance of institutions, the role of networks, the operation of culture, et cetera, when building your argument. Indeed, you are expected to use the relevant readings from the course to address the prompt you chose. You are welcome to use external readings too, but you should be able to tackle this project just with the readings in our reading list. You are also expected to give us readers some information about the case that you selected and why you selected it. As part of the text, you will have to introduce briefly what the case is about and why it matters for your argument. Along with the main text of your project, you are expected to include a list of references. Please, separate the references that refer to theories and sociological texts from those that refer to your selected case. This last group are “primary sources”, and may include news articles, online materials, reddit threads, etc. Divide your references into “primary sources” (which refers to the sources for the case) and “bibliography” (which refers to the readings that you used to build your argument). The main text may be no longer than 2000 words. RubricFinal essayFinal essayCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConcepts10 ptsFull MarksCorrectly identifies the main and most important concepts from the readings that are relevant for addressing the prompt. Explains how the concepts are relevant, provides reference information, and uses them to illustrate the examples.7 ptsLess marksIdentifies some of the concepts of the readings, but leaves important gaps or does not explain why they matter for understanding the example,0 ptsNo MarksDoes not identify or use important concepts from the readings10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis10 ptsFull MarksShows how concepts from the readings and broader literature in economic sociology are linked to the answer to the prompt. Uses these connections to address the question/analyze the case. Avoids completely language that essentializes characteristics associated to race, gender, and class (e.g. “poor people work less”, “women are more caring”). In addition to not being grounded on evidence, these stereotypes add little to analysis.6 ptsFewer marksShows some understanding of concepts and their connections, but does not use these connections in the answer. Language essentializes.0 ptsNo marksDoes not engage with the connections between concepts or with their application.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical thought10 ptsFull MarksExplores the writing prompt from a critical perspective, taking into account several possibilities backed by empirical materials and individual experience that are then assessed to be eliminated, or supported. Tries to contrast concepts and to show their origin, implication, and use. Expands on concepts, or links them, and reflects on their limitations.6 ptsFewer marksDescriptive account that does not think of the concepts/discussions in the literature, takes concepts for granted, and or does not show relevance of approach.0 ptsNo MarksTakes concepts and examples at face value, without showing critical reflection about their use or importance.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting10 ptsFull MarksThe text is written in a concise though thoughtful format. Examples are given to support evidence, and empirical materials are used to give weight to claims. Proper referencing is followed consistently throughout the text.6 ptsFewer marksText is overly descriptive, taking claims from the literature at face value without any further analysis.0 ptsNo MarksText is brief and hastily written. Does not show engagement with the texts.10 ptsTotal Points: 40
Requirements: 2000words

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services