Complete Peer Reviews for two of your peers

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Learning Goal: I’m working on a english case study and need support to help me learn.Overview:This activity has two parts to it. I will be awarding points for the draft here. So, you will submit the draft here, AND you will be doing peer review here. The purpose of submitting this draft is so you can get feedback AND to GIVE FEEDBACK. Do not submit this draft if you are not going to participate in peer review for others.1). Draft Submission Instructions: Thursday, March 17 (before midnight): Submit your Rhetorical Analysis Essay DraftEssay 1 Rhetorical Analysis Essay Prompt OL SPR 2022.docxActionsInitial Draft Submission= 15 Points (Submission Points contingent on participation in Peer Review of classmates’ essays).This needs to be a FULL draft (4-6 pages) of your essay to participate in the peer review and receive credit. Try to have your essay in the best possible shape, so that you can get useful feedback on it to make worthwhile revisions. (There is not much point to getting feedback on something we already know how and what we want to change). Make sure to review the assignment and previous modules for the necessary requirements.
This must be submitted as a Word or PDF file, and it must be on time. (Submitting this late means you will not be able to participate in Peer Review because peer reviews are automatically generated in Canvas, which means you will be missing out on both sets of points–draft submission points and peer review points).
Again, please note that the purpose of this activity is to submit a rough draft FOR PEER REVIEW. If you aren’t planning to participate in the peer review of reading and commenting on other people’s papers, then don’t submit your draft either. Draft Submission points are contingent on active participation in the whole peer review activity. The peer review activity is the whole purpose of submitting the draft!
Use MLA Formatting.
2). Peer Review Instructions: Monday, March 21 (before midnight): Complete Peer Reviews for two of your peers. (Your peer review partners will be assigned by Canvas beginning Friday afternoon, March 18, after you have submitted your initial draft. You will not be assigned peers to review if you have not submitted your own draft, thus you will lose out on both sets of points). Peer Reviews= 15 Points (Please see Peer Review grading criteria below). To complete the peer reviews, please complete the following steps:Complete the peer reviews by reading your assigned peers’ papers and using the RUBRIC provided. A completed review will include your rubric marks AND a specific comment for EACH criterion AND a general overall comment in the comment section.
Your goal in terms of grade is to convince me that you’ve read your partner’s draft closely and have thought hard about their draft, both in terms of what worked and what your partner should consider when they revise. Brief answers or answers like “I didn’t see anything” or “I didn’t have any questions” will result in a reduction in grade. Good peer review is detailed peer review. Please examine your partners’ essays closely for both strengths and weaknesses, and explain what you see in detail. When appropriate, refer to specific paragraph #’s to help guide your peer’s considerations for revision. You may also feel free to add additional comments in the submission comments.
Please don’t become concerned about the “Overall Score” for the Rubric or feel bad for giving low scores in particular criterion. The numbers are just a tool for students to see which areas they might focus on for revision; your specific comments will be the most useful in terms of the rubric. Students will not be “graded” on the score you give your peers.
Be honest, but be kind in your comments! If you can help each other out during the draft / revision process, then you will help each other be more successful when you submit for a final grade.
Rhetorical Analysis Essay Peer Review FALL2021
Rhetorical Analysis Essay Peer Review FALL2021CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction: Hook and Background5 ptsDone Very Well / Very Effective4 ptsDone Well / Effective / Could Use Minor Revision3 ptsDone / Adequate / Could Use Revision2 ptsIncomplete / Inadequate / Needs Revision1 ptsSeverely Incomplete or Misunderstands Concept / Severely Inadequate or Problematic / Needs Significant Revision0 ptsNot done/ Not sure5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction: Rhetorical Analysis Evaluative Thesisb. Is it placed at the end of the introduction section as a concise 1-2 sentence statement?c. Is the thesis on topic to the essay prompt? For the RA essay, did the student state whether or not he/she found the author’s rhetoric to be effective and indicate reasons why?d. Does the student avoid first person opinion statements (I found, I thought, I like / dislike, my opinion) and second person (you)?e. Is there any confusing or awkward wording that needs attention?5 ptsDone Very Well / Very Effective4 ptsDone Well / Effective / Could Use Minor Revision3 ptsDone / Adequate / Could Use Revision2 ptsIncomplete /Inadequate / Needs Revision1 ptsSeverely Incomplete or Misunderstand Concept / Severely Inadequate or Problematic / Needs Significant Revision0 ptsNot Done/ Not Sure5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody Paragraphs: Topic Sentences**Be specific when citing paragraphs that are particularly strong or need work, such as which Body Paragraph (BP 1, BP 2, BP 3) etc.. to help guide the student in his / her considerations for revision.5 ptsDone Very Well / Very Effective4 ptsDone Well / Effective / Could Use Minor Revision3 ptsDone / Adequate / Could Use Revision2 ptsIncomplete /Inadequate / Needs Revision1 ptsSeverely Incomplete or Misunderstands Concept / Severely Inadequate or Problematic / Needs Significant Revision0 ptsNot Done/ Not Sure5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody Paragraphs: Textual Evidence- SelectionAre the body paragraphs examples unified around supporting the point in the topic sentence? **Be specific when citing paragraphs that are particularly strong or need work, such as which Body Paragraph (BP 1, BP 2, BP 3) etc.. to help guide the student in his / her considerations for revision.5 ptsDone Very Well / Very Effective4 ptsDone Well / Effective / Could Use Minor Revision3 ptsDone / Adequate / Could Use Revision2 ptsIncomplete /Inadequate / Needs Revision1 ptsSeverely Incomplete or Misunderstands Concept / Severely Inadequate or Problematic / Needs Significant Revision0 ptsNot Done/ Not Sure5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody Paragraphs: Textual Evidence- CitationAre the examples clear (provide enough background / context) for an unfamiliar reader?Does the student cite each textual example (quote, paraphrase, or summary) with an in-text citation of a signal phrase / author ID tag to lead into the quote or paraphrase and parenthetical information (page number) to follow?**Be specific when citing paragraphs that are particularly strong or need work, such as which Body Paragraph (BP 1, BP 2, BP 3) etc.. to help guide the student in his / her considerations for revision.5 ptsDone Very Well / Very Effective4 ptsDone Well / Effective / Could Use Minor Revision3 ptsDone / Adequate / Could Use Revision2 ptsIncomplete /Inadequate / Needs Revision1 ptsSeverely Incomplete or Misunderstands Concept / Severely Inadequate or Problematic / Needs Significant Revision0 ptsNot Done / Not Sure5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody Paragraphs: Textual Evidence- Explanation, Analysis, and EvaluationDoes the student fully analyze how the quote / evidence provided creates ethos, pathos, or logos and in what way it is effective or not for its intended audience and purpose? (This should be well-developed–this is the most important part of the paragraph–the student’s in-depth analysis of how the quote is used as a means of persuasion and why it is or isn’t effective).For an RA Essay: The student needs to select strong examples of the rhetorical technique and show HOW each example of the rhetorical technique appeals to the intended audience or WHY the specific example emphasizes the purpose in the argument? The analysis / evaluation should clarify how each rhetorical choice is or isn’t effective for the author’s intended purpose.**Be specific when citing paragraphs that are particularly strong or need work, such as which Body Paragraph (BP 1, BP 2, BP 3) etc.. to help guide the student in his / her considerations for revision.5 ptsDone Very Well / Very Effective4 ptsDone Well / Effective / Could Use Minor Revision3 ptsIncomplete /Inadequate / Needs Revision2 ptsIncomplete /Inadequate / Needs Revision1 ptsSeverely Incomplete or Misunderstands Concept / Severely Inadequate or Problematic / Needs Significant Revision0 ptsNo Marks5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion5 ptsDone Very Well / Very Effective4 ptsDone Well / Effective / Could Use Minor Revision3 ptsDone / Adequate / Could Use Revision2 ptsIncomplete /Inadequate / Needs Revision1 ptsSeverely Incomplete or Misunderstands Concept / Severely Inadequate or Problematic / Needs Significant Revision0 ptsNot done/ Not sure5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and TransitionsIs there a smooth flow of ideas ordered in a logical sequence within the paragraph (coherence)? Are the topic sentences varied to demonstrate a more sophisticated style? Are there effective transitions between paragraphs demonstrating how ideas connect? (Try to avoid simplistic transitions).5 ptsDone Very Well / Very Effective4 ptsDone Well / Effective / Could Use Minor Revision3 ptsDone / Adequate / Could Use Revision2 ptsIncomplete /Inadequate / Needs Revision1 ptsSeverely Incomplete or Misunderstands Concept / Severely Inadequate or Problematic / Needs Significant Revision0 ptsNot done/ Not sure5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWorks CitedIF the student included the Works Cited in the draft, please consider the following:Is the source listed correctly in Works Cited page? As far as you can tell, is the citation correctly cited in MLA format? (Remember the articles from the textbook should be cited as a Work in Anthology first, then with the added original publication information at the end. (Please see the instruction and example in the instruction modules).Is the Works Cited page formatted correctly? Is it formatted as a hanging indent? Is everything double-spaced? (For most of you, you will only have one source, but if there is more than one source, are they listed in alphabetical order).**If the student has not included the Works Cited in the draft, this will just serve as a reminder to do so for the final and what to consider when revising.**5 ptsDone Very Well / Very Effective4 ptsDone Well / Effective / Could Use Minor Revision3 ptsDone / Adequate / Could Use Revision2 ptsIncomplete /Inadequate / Needs Revision1 ptsSeverely Incomplete or Misunderstands Concept / Severely Inadequate or Problematic / Needs Significant Revision0 ptsNot done/ Not sure5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Impression**This is a space for you to write general comments about the essay or to highlight areas that might not have been on the rubric. These could be pointing out strengths or possible areas for revision.5 ptsDone Very Well / Very Effective4 ptsDone Well / Effective / Could Use Minor Revision3 ptsDone / Adequate / Could Use Revision2 ptsIncomplete /Inadequate / Needs Revision1 ptsSeverely Incomplete or Misunderstands Concept / Severely Inadequate or Problematic / Needs Significant Revision0 ptsNot done/ Not sure5 pts
Requirements: 5 pages

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services