Give examples of how the author backs their claim.

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Learning Goal: I’m working on a american studies report and need a sample draft to help me learn.Read the two articles in the World War Two Readings folder on canvas: Martin van Creveld’s“The German Wehrmacht Was Superior to the US Army,” and Michael Doubler’s “The Superiority of American GIs.” Just as you did for essay #1, respond to the readings in a short essay format following the following guidelines.In the first part of the essay, summarize the two readings in your own words, including identification of theses. Discuss how each essay supports the arguments they make. The second part of the essay is your response to their arguments. Which author made a more convincing case, and why? As usual, use examples from the text and cite them with footnotes to support your take. Each paper will be between 750-1000 words, to be submitted to canvas by the deadlines marked on the syllabus. Formatting rules and a general outline are included below.——————————————————————————————————–Include:  Your name in heading- AND NOTHING ELSE.  A title 12 point font with normative font style  Double spaced Use quotes JUDICIOUSLY Well-written prose, with no grammatical errors Third-person voice and active voice! Tight topic sentences and indent for new paragraphs.  Correct formatting and essay organization according to the outline below. Use Chicago footnotes. See this link: https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citatio…—————————————————————————————————–Organization:Part I: Introduce and summarize van Creveld article (~1p.)1. Mention title, author.2. Identify thesis3. Give examples of how the author backs their claim. Introduce and summarize Doubler article (~1p.)1. Mention title, author.2. Identify thesis3. Give examples of how the author backs their claim & note any overlaps/divergence over van Creveld’s claims.Part II: Response (~1-2 p)1. Assess the effectiveness and persuasiveness of each article. 2. Which author made a more convincing case and why? 3. Use material from the text as evidence, and make connections to lecture and Shi readings.
Requirements: 750-1000 words

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services