Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
Argument for the limitation of the study:
• Making a connection of having the background in interior design (a degree in interior design) there’s this interesting overlap between architecture and interior design and the reason I find it very interesting is because my background is in both of these areas Helps the reader understand why I am looking at the interiors (understand the zones and spaces) and tying it up to the architecture.
• Why is the study done in Newcastle? (regional)(the recent NSW Government Architect publication – it makes a case for regions to develop their own climatic and cultural responses) the importance of the region an argument that I am looking in Newcastle but not Sydney for example
• Why looking at only the past 5 years? Wanting to be involved in now the current built and wanting to be a part of it and what going to building in the next year. (Contemporary time not interested in the past)
• Why looking at contemporary apartments?
• Why looking at floor plans? Looking at it at an organizational level between the zones and spaces within a house in apartment building. Spatial argument maybe looks at spaces syntax we they use floor plans as well in their study by analysing the plans.
• Why looking at 1–2-bedroom apartments? Smaller houses create greater demands on the adaptability of spaces, so their evaluation in particular has become a focus of this study (we can’t use we’re not including large houses in apartment building and that’s because they already have a lot of space that can be adaptable. Need to be more positive in the way of saying things instead of saying why not looking at larger apartments) looking at smaller ones because they are affordable making an argument for smaller apartments
• Why looking at only 5 lifestyle patterns (single-couple-children-visitors or an office-privacy separated teenager) example -investigating whether houses in apartments building can facilitate the independent living home office but it may not be good to facilitate children. Not interested in their personal lives but more what they need as spaces facilitated their 5 different lifestyle patterns. People after Covid see more values towards their houses and people are spending more time in their houses.
• Some house with IOP can be highly adaptable being separated into to house and so just convert a space next to the entrance into an office. Given a floor plan and seeing if it’s striped to a naked apartment how the spaces will be divided based on the characteristics on that floor plan. Will it be just adding an office or could the floor plan be separate to two individual houses. Some floor plans are better than others with facilitated IOP
• Looking at apartment regulation of NSW; not changing the external appearance, structure, fire or the services in the apartment building but we can take down the unstructured unfixed walls inside the house in the apartment building. There are no regulations that states that I can’t do that. But needs to be close the toilet.
Everything needs to relate to the abstract
Abstract updated: This research evaluates (measures) the extent to which IOP exists within unfitted houses in apartment buildings in Newcastle Australia built within 5 years and shows how IOP can be better facilitated within existing and new apartments. The potential of IOP can be brought through the unfixed furniture to adapt to the changing lifestyle patterns of its occupants within time, where through the unfixed furniture (cabinets, partitions, folded beds, benches) in the house within the apartment building it can be able to be modified and arranged in more intuitive and spontaneous ways to adapt to those changes within time. The changes within time are like single-couple-having kids-people come to visit-kids move out, turn it into an office facilitating the 5 different lifestyle patterns.