Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
Targeted Rhetorical Strategies: They Say / I Say organization Directed Summary (of a primary course reading or issue that opens the conversation) Academic claim (that is narrow, original, arguable, and important) Quote Integration (of at least four direct quotes) !!Synthesis (**of at least three course texts**) PIE Paragraphing (for analysis paragraphs) Parenthetical Citations and a Works Cited page following MLA guidelines Technical Requirements: Formatted according to course guidelines (review the Heading and Formatting Guidelines for Written Work) On time submission to Canvas Minimum 4 pages Maximum 6 pages Introduction / Explanation So far this quarter, we have explored a variety of language issues as they relate to matters of identity and power. On large and small scales, we have examined how issues related to language play out in real world situations. In addition to a range of topics, positions, ideas, and events, we have also read several different kinds or genres of texts—from personal narratives to academic research and arguments. The Task For this essay, create an academic argument (with a narrow, original, arguable, important academic claim) that addresses one of the language issues / topics we’ve discussed this quarter, and brings together at least three (3) course texts (texts we’ve read in / for this class). How you use multiple texts to create a complex conversation and support a critical position is a key feature of this assignment. One of your major tasks, then, is to explore how different readings come together and work with and against each other as part of your academic argument. Your argument must include a counterargument and at least four (4) fully integrated direct quotations from any of the texts you use. This assignment is purposefully broad in topic. I want you to invest time into thinking about what has been significant, relevant, and / or interesting to you in what we have read and discussed thus far. Use the course theme (language, identity, and power) and course questions and readings to help guide your topic choices. Evidence and Synthesis Academic argumentation is rooted in evidence. In this instance, your evidence should come from a careful examination of the texts used in this class. No outside research is required, although you can include additional evidence if you appropriately cite the material in the paper and in the works cited page. Additionally, personal experience can serve as a kind of evidence in this assignment, however, it cannot be the only support for your argument. Personal experience, if used, should enhance your argument and engagement with other texts / ideas. Your careful reading and synthesis of course texts should be highlighted as a significant source of evidence / support. Part of supporting an academic argument and effectively utilzing multiple kinds of evidence, require synthesis. A synthesis draws on multiple sources to add new insights and reach a broader conclusion. In synthesis, you need to combine the information from those multiple sources and add your own analysis of the texts. This means that each of your analysis / argumentative paragraphs will include multiple sources and citations, as well as your own ideas and voice. Audience For this writing situation, your audience consists of me, your peers, and other readers in the US academy. This audience is interested in intellectual pursuits of all kinds, but they do not necessarily possess any specialized knowledge of or familiarity with issues of language, power, and identity. Do not assume your readers have read any of the course texts or are familiar with any of the events / situations / concepts we’ve discussed this quarter. Course material should be introduced and summarized in some fashion. Additionally, you should consider the tone, language, organization, and evidence expectations this kind of audience might have, and consider the risks and rewards of either fulfilling (some of) those expectations or challenging (some of) them
