Draft a ‘judicial response’ (a well reasoning argument) to each of the three due process issues you select that carefully and thoughtfully explains how a reasonable judge should rule on each of them

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

The Role of the Judge
Part of our focus for Module III is on the role of the judge. In keeping with our
desire to allow creativity and encourage critical analysis,
Assignment # 2 gives you a
chance to act as a judge in resolving some of the due process issues Kareem has
faced so far in the ‘Inside the Courtroom’ case scenario. As you remember, in
Assignment # 1 you identified, explained, and connected various due process issues
in this problem to various Bill of Rights Amendments. Assignment # 2 builds on this
first exercise while also expanding your due process options for analysis.
For Assignment # 2, you will again select three (3) due process issues Kareem has
faced. You now have Chapters I-III of the case scenario from which to select these due
process issues.
For this assignment, you will draft a ‘judicial response’ (a well reasoning
argument) to each of the three due process issues you select that carefully and
thoughtfully explains how a reasonable judge should rule on each of them. We are
looking for quality reasoning skills, not just a list of prior court case citations. You do
not need to use ‘legal jargon’ or be a ‘pre-law student’ to succeed in this assignment. —-
You may use the textbook or any outside scholarly source (including any of the
Supplemental Readings) to help support your arguments. Be sure to include an
appropriate citation when you use an outside source for support. You may use the due
process issues you selected for the First Assignment or you may use due process issues
found in the more recent segments of the hypothetical problem.
In keeping with our plan to encourage clear and concise writing, there is a word
limitation to your full response for Assignment # 2.
Your response to the three (3) due
process issues (all three issues combined) should not exceed 450 words. This means
that you should consider writing about 150 words in drafting your ‘student version’ of a
judicial opinion for each issue you choose to discuss.
Assignment 2 will be graded as follows:
1. Five (5) points for crafting a well-supported ‘judicial’ opinion resolving each of the
three (3) due process issues/violations. (Remember, we recognize that you are not law
students so the focus is on proving clear and persuasive reasoning to support your
argument as to how each of these 3 due process issues/ violations should be handled
in an American court. You do not need to cite precedent cases in your opinion.)
2. Thus, the total point value for the assignment is five (5) points for each of the three (3)
issue focused judicial opinions (arguments) for a total of fifteen (15) points
3. If your full response to all three (3) issues exceeds 450 words, one (1) or two (2) points
may be deducted from your final score for this assignment

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services