respond to 2 PEER REVIEWS RESPONSE ON A LORETTA ROSS VIDEO.

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

WATCH THE VIDEO LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrk50HIf9Ww&feature=youtu.be , and respond to 2 PEER REVIEWS RESPONSE ON A LORETTA ROSS VIDEO. This is for a health policy nursing program. Each response to the two peers should not be less than 175 words each. Preferably 200 words minimum each.
I will include my answers to the questions so you have an idea.
——-GRADING RUBRIC:———-
Students are expected to complete the exercises on time every week. Repeatedly posting last-minute responses to peer postings that simply repeat earlier postings or that include statements such as, “I agree, and don’t really have anything else to add to the discussion,” or, “Sorry, I’m always coming in late, and I’m late again this week,” will result in the loss of discussion participation points every week this occurs.
It’s important that each class member participates actively in the discussions at a level that fosters both individual learning and the learning of others. Brief remarks like “I agree”, “Thank you for sharing your thoughts”, “You made a great point!” are necessary
for constructive discussions. I therefore encourage you to use brief remarks like these whenever appropriate in your responses to your peers. However, bear in mind that brief remarks like these do NOT count as substantial contributions. To qualify as substantial contributions, you need to provide new and significant insights that can move the discussion forward by, for instance, eliciting new thinking beyond what has already been said. One example would be: “I agree with what (Student A) said about (Subject B). I also think that an additional factor (Issue C) should be considered as well because of (Reason D).” Another example would be: “Thank you (Student X) for sharing your insight. I however respectfully disagree based on the following facts (Facts Y and Z) as evidenced in the following credible sources (Sources 1 and 2).”
effectiveness of prompting participation from peers; (3) quality of follow-up questions, insights, and responses to other students’ questions and comments. The following rubric applies to
both the initial and follow-up posts:
· 2.0 points (Excellent): Demonstrates excellence in grasping key concepts; respectful and constructive critiques of others’ works; stimulates discussion; provides sample citations and/or Web links for support of opinions; readily offers new interpretations of discussion material; ideas are expressed clearly, concisely; uses appropriate vocabulary.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services