Examine the extent to which the career paths of two managers conform,

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

. Assessment title: Examine the extent to which the career paths of two managers conform, or do not conform, to the pattern of the Managerial Escalator. Reflect on the potential implications of the Managerial Escalator model and the findings of your interviews for your own career. Word count: 2,500 words +/- 10% (excluding material in the title page, abstract, table of content, reference list at the end of the report and appendices). Assessment task: For the first assignment you are asked to interview two people with supervisory or managerial responsibility and write a report on: The extent to which the career paths of both people you have interviewed conform, or do not conform, to the pattern of the managerial escalator. Also, reflect on the implications of the Managerial Escalator model and the findings of your interviews for your own career. In order to carry out this assignment you are asked to: Study the content of Chapter One in the book: Skills of Management and Leadership (Rees & Porter, 2015). Find two managers to interview – these could be relatives, friends, acquaintances, or managers that you come across in the course of your daily life. Work out from doing the above reading, what questions you need to ask. Devise a questionnaire based on your reading and check the questions out with your class, seminar or workshop tutor. When you have carried out your two interviews, write a report on your findings, bearing in mind the advice given in the Lecture Week 2, and the reading on Blackboard. Please remember that your report is an academic piece of work and that an academic reader will be reading it. We are interested in how well you understand the concept of the Managerial Escalator and its relevance to the two managers you have interviewed, as well as yourself. Be sure to include references to the Hybrid Manager, Managerial Gap and the four remedial strategies. Coursework assessment marking criteria The mark you receive will be influenced by the following: Criterion Weighting Has the task been carried out as specified . two interviews with managers & the theory of the Managerial Escalator tested on them; reflections on implications for your own career. 20% Quality of the questionnaire 20% Use of evidence to underpin any points that are being made 15% Quality of the discussion: is the argument coherent and does it follow a logical structure? 20% Has the Westminster Harvard referencing system been used correctly? 10% Use of correct spelling, punctuation and grammar 15% Detailed guidance notes Title page: Include the word count, the coursework title, your seminar leader name, the module code and title. Abstract: Include an Abstract, which in practice is the same as an Executive Summary. It should not be too long but should concentrate on what you did and why what you found out. It is not the same as an Introduction because an Abstract should include a brief summary of the findings of the report. Table of content: Include a table of content at the beginning of your report with page numbers. Introduction: A short introduction should introduce‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ the whole report and not just the topic. . introduce the the topic briefly, the purpose, how you gathered the information, and the structure of the report. Exposition of the theory You will need to explain the concept of the Managerial Escalator at the start of your report. Also the Managerial Hybrid, the Managerial Gap and the four remedial strategies. Methodology It is best to have face-to-face interviews (using a suitable online platform if necessary) and encourage people to enlarge on what they have to say – they may bring up relevant points that you had not thought to ask. Interview questions are easier to phrase than a questionnaire because you will be on hand to rephrase or ask follow up questions if necessary. You will have to evaluate what they say in terms of how accurate you think their responses may be. Findings You don’t need to include the verbatim answers from your interviewees – just select the relevant parts from their answers to your questions covering the concept of the Managerial Escalator, Hybrid Management, Managerial Gap and use of the four remedial strategies in their respective organisations, or vis a vis themselves. Analysis Having described your findings, analyse these to decide on the extent to which the career path to date of one, both or neither manager you interviewed conforms to the concept of the Managerial Escalator. The example of the Managerial Escalator in the book is indicative only. In particular, the time scale or over which people accumulate managerial responsibilities will vary from person to person. One way of representing your findings, which can be very effective, is to draw diagrams of the actual progression of the two people you have interviewed. There is no bar on interviewing two people from the same organisation and/or family members. You should speculate on your own future career path and a paragraph on this will be necessary. Conclusion: Tie up your arguments in the conclusion – but this is not the place to include fresh evidence. Be sure to answer the question contained in the assignment title. You may want to add recommendations about what the parties need to do or what the organization could do to make them more effective. Referencing: When you make direct quotes you should put them in inverted commas and give brief details of the source, including the page number . (Rees and Porter, 2015, ). The full reference should appear in the list of references. You can cross check with examples from Rees and Porter (2015) on how to layout references. General references to . a book or article do not have to appear in inverted commas. A bibliography is used for any general works you have used. Report format Insert page numbers in your report, use double spacing between the lines, use a bigger margin on the right; Use font Arial 12 or similar, use formal language, British English spelling. For preference please do not upload in PDF format. Supporting documents relating to the Interview: • Appendix 1 – Please attach the interview schedule you have drawn up as an Appendix to the report. You do not need to include the actual interview responses. Please refer to the appendix in the main bo‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍dy of the report.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services