Cash, A. (2005). Wiley Concise Guides to Mental Health: Posttraumatic Stress Dis

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Cash, A. (2005). Wiley Concise Guides to Mental Health: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 9780471705130.
Friedman, M. (2015). Posttraumatic and Acute Stress Disorders (6th ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing. ISBN: 9783319150659.
READING REPORT: CASH AND FRIEDMAN ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
The ability to easily synthesize published literature is imperative in the helping professions. This
assignment will give you the opportunity to engage with the course textbooks on PTSD by
concisely, yet thoroughly, summarizing the material. You will also be able to identify how the
material relates to your personal and/or professional journey by discussing the influence of the
material on your own goals.
INSTRUCTIONS
This assignment should cover any five chapters of your choosing from the Cash and/or Friedman
required texts and be written in the following format:
– Summary: Please list what 5 chapters you are covering in the report. Then, write a no-
nonsense summary that identifies the key themes (much like the summary on the back
cover of a book). Please make sure you cite the author in this section since you are
summarizing the material. There is no specific length requirement for this section.
However, a concise, yet thorough, summary is usually 1-2 pages.
– Application: How does the information in this book influence how you are going to
continue your own personal growth process? How could you apply the concepts of what
you read to your future career? What actions or changes are you going to make in your
life and your (current or future) work as a result of your learning? Be precise in
summarizing concrete action steps. This section should be at least 250 words.
– Critical Thinking Questions: Critical thinking involves asking questions about
clarification of key issues, worldview assumptions, reasons/evidence, and implications of
materials. Please generate 5 questions based on what you read and/or questions you have
about how the material applies to your area of study/interest. You may simply list the
questions in the reading report.
An example of a good critical thinking question is as follows: The Friedman (2015) text
suggests on page 3 that even infants can be traumatized, using the example of a fictional
character who watched his parents murdered as a very young child. What would trauma
look like in an individual who was too young to remember the traumatic event? How
would this impact the developmental process?
This assignment should be written in either current APA or Turabian format. It should be double-
spaced and include both a title page and a references/bibliography page. The only required
resource(s) is/are the book(s) being reviewed.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Reading Report Grading Rubric
Reading Report Grading Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary
30 to >27.0 pts
Advanced
• The 5 chapters read are specified • 5 chapters are clearly summarized according to the instructions • The chapters clearly cover major themes • The paper demonstrates thorough familiarity with the chapters’ content
27 to >25.0 pts
Proficient
• The 5 chapters read are specified • 5 chapters are summarized according to the instructions • The chapters cover major themes • The paper demonstrates basic familiarity with the chapters’ content
25 to >22.0 pts
Developing
• A minimum of 3 chapters are covered • The summary section needs to be developed more fully. The major themes/messages were not clearly stated • The summary did not demonstrate a familiarity with the chapters’ content
22 to >0.0 pts
Below Expectations
• The summary was poorly written or was not present in the paper • Only 1-2 chapters were covered • The summary did not demonstrate a familiarity with the chapters’ content
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication
30 to >27.0 pts
Advanced
• Concepts from the reading fully related to the student’s personal growth • Concepts from the reading are specifically applied to student’s goals • Specific action steps are mentioned
27 to >25.0 pts
Proficient
• Concepts from the reading related to the student’s personal growth are present but not well developed • Concepts from the reading are minimally applied to student’s goals • Action steps are mentioned
25 to >22.0 pts
Developing
• Concepts from the reading related to personal growth are weak • Student didn’t include both personal growth and goals (covered one area but not both); • Action steps may be weak or missing
22 to >0.0 pts
Below Expectations
• Concepts from the reading related to personal growth are missing • The application of the reading is weak • Action steps not addressed
0 pts
Not Present
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical thinking questions
10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
• 5 well written questions that focus on critical thinking
9 to >8.0 pts
Proficient
• 5 questions but may not demonstrate critical thinking (ex: yes/no questions) • 4 well written questions
8 to >7.0 pts
Developing
• 4 questions but may not demonstrate critical thinking (ex: yes/no questions)
7 to >0.0 pts
Below Expectations
• 2 points per question (less than 4 questions) • Questions do not demonstrate critical thinking
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
20 to >18.0 pts
Advanced
• All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity • There are clear transitions between paragraphs • There is a strong, clear, and logical flow • The paper meets the page length requirement
18 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
• Most required elements are included and organized • There are transitions between paragraphs and sections • Paper is mostly clear with a logical flow • The paper meets the page length requirement
16 to >15.0 pts
Developing
• Some required elements are included and are mostly organized • Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. • The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. • The paper may not meet the page length requirement
15 to >0.0 pts
Below Expectations
• Few or no required elements are included • Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. • There may not be a logical treatment of the topic. • The paper does not meet the page length requirement
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar/Style
10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
• The paper properly uses current APA or Turabian style. • Correct APA or Turabian style cover page • Correct APA style references page or Turabian style bibliography • Proper headings and in-text citations are formatted correctly. • The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are very few spelling and grammar errors.
9 to >8.0 pts
Proficient
• The paper consistently uses current APA or Turabian style with few or no exceptions. • APA or Turabian style cover page (with minor errors) • APA style references page or Turabian style bibliography (with few errors) • Proper headings and in-text citations are formatted with few errors • The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are few spelling and grammar errors.
8 to >7.0 pts
Developing
• The paper inconsistently uses APA or Turabian style. • Is missing an APA or Turabian style cover page or references/bibliography page (or major formatting errors in both) • Headings and in-text citations are inconsistently formatted. • The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are spelling and grammar errors.
7 to >0.0 pts
Below Expectations
• The paper erroneously uses or does not use APA or Turabian style • Headings and in-text citations are erroneously formatted or not present. • Missing APA or Turabian style cover page and APA or Turabian style references/bibliography page • The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. • There are spelling and grammar errors.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Total Points: 100

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services