How do you think conceptions of freedom affected relations between Indians and E

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

How do you think conceptions of freedom affected relations between Indians and Europeans?
kindly cite this book – THE AMERICAN YAWP
please read through this article.
Some Europeans saw Native Americans as embodying freedom and liberty as Europeans understood the terms, but most soon thought that such notions of “freedom” were foreign to native societies. Europeans believed that Indians were savages in part because they did not seem to have governments or legal systems and lacked the respect for authority, discipline, and order that Europeans believed marked their civilizations. The modern idea of freedom as personal independence, often based on the ownership of private property, meant little in most Indian societies. But Indians had their own ideas of freedom, as is evident in the practice of small-scale slavery in some Indian groups (although buying and selling slaves was unknown), and in their resistance to enslavement by Europeans.
Although Indians respected individual thought and judgment that conflicted with group decisions, they generally emphasized commitment to family and community, group autonomy, self-determination, and mutual obligations accompanied by belonging and connectedness over individual freedom.
When Europeans colonized the New World, they had multiple ideas of freedom as a collection of rights and privileges, many of which were reserved for a small portion of the population. One important idea of freedom was religious or moral, based on an individual’s decision to subordinate himself to the Christian God. This was not the same as modern notions of religious freedom or tolerance. Each European country had an established church, and their governments often suppressed or heavily regulated other Christian and non-Christian groups.
Secular ideas of freedom located liberty in individual obedience to the law and the acceptance of one’s rank and duties within a rigid and extensive social hierarchy, ranging from urban poor and rural peasants at the bottom to church officials, hereditary aristocrats and nobles, and kings and other members of monarchies at the top. Inequality was built into all social relations; the king ruled by divine right, and superiors demanded deference from their social inferiors. In families, men had authority over the “dependent” women and children, whose legal identities were subsumed by that of the male. Women could not own property, control their wages, write separate wills, or even—in most cases—divorce, and husbands had rights to their wives’ labor and bodies.
Few men enjoyed the freedom derived from economic independence, which usually involved landownership, and property qualifications for voting meant that few men could vote. Modern civil liberties such as freedom of religion and speech did not exist. Workers who defied employers and labor contracts suffered harsh criminal penalties. Yet each European country that colonized the New World claimed to be spreading freedom for itself and the Indians.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services