A key to analyzing almost any discrimination case is determining whether an employer’s given reason for taking action against an employee is the real reason, or a cover for intentional discrimination

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

A key to analyzing almost any discrimination case is determining whether an employer’s given reason for taking action against an employee is the real reason, or a cover for intentional discrimination

Posted at 13:31h
in business
by

Share
Essay Reference:
New York and New Jersey v Arbitron
Diversity Issue: Minority Discrimination—Portable People Meters
New York and New Jersey sued Arbitron for civil rights violations with its new Portable People Meters (PPMs). PPMs measure radio station program ratings. The states filed the lawsuits because they believed the PPMs were not being distributed to people from traditionally underrepresented groups.
Attorneys general of New York, New Jersey Sue Arbitron over PPM Issues. (2013, February 24). In Target Market News from Radio Ink. Retrieved February 24, 2013, from http://www.targetmarketnews.
Information and Instructions:The managers of today have gone far beyond consideration of workers in terms of single diversity dimensions. Managers deal daily with multiple identities: a worker who is not just older, but who is older and female or the worker who is male and Asian-American and has a visual disability. The judicial system however, still deals only in single dimensions. Discrimination charges and lawsuits are rarely filed in terms of composites; they are filed in terms of age or gender or race or religion or disability or other single dimensions of diversity.
A variety of actual cases and situations are presented here representing a broad spectrum of diversity issues in a wide variety of organizations. Each of the cases and situations outlined below involves ethical as well as legal issues in diversity.

For your case or situation, consider the ethical implications according to your own ethical framework. What do you personally think should be the outcome or resolution?
Information on the resolution or current status of most of the cases and situations can be found on the Internet. Were the outcomes and rationales similar to what you thought they should be? Why or why not.

Notes:

You will be assigned a case at random, and once you open the assignment you will have 180 minutes to develop a well-written response to the analysis questions listed above. I expect your response to be 5-8 paragraphs. You may use external resources to assist in developing your response. Before opening the assignment make sure you are in a quiet space and have sufficient time to devote to developing your response.
You will be assessed on your ability to articulate that you clearly understand the legal and ethical dilemma in the case and your ability to formulate an analysis of the actual outcomes of the case.
You may attempt this assignment twice
Ethical and legal questions arise as to what constitutes discrimination and what an employer’s obligations are when an employee has a disability. Consider the guidance offered below in making your judgments.

LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
Pretext Analysis. A key to analyzing almost any discrimination case is determining whether an employer’s given reason for taking action against an employee is the real reason, or a cover for intentional discrimination. This is known as a pretext analysis.
Under ADA, employers have the legal obligation to provide reasonable accommodations for workers with disabilities to enable them to perform their jobs. Employers are not required to provide personal accommodations such as hearing aids and wheel chairs.
Employers should be especially vigilant in defining and articulating essential job functions, and documenting the risks associated with an employee’s failure to perform such functions.
Spoilation refers to the destruction, alteration, or withholding of evidence. It results in the courts assessing penalties or even preventing the party from presenting evidence at all because if some of the evidence is “spoiled,” then all of it is suspect.

Related Tags
Academic
APA
Assignment
Business
Capstone
College
Conclusion
Course
Day
Discussion
Double Spaced
Essay
English
Finance
General
Graduate
History
Information
Justify
Literature
Management
Market
Masters
Math
Minimum
MLA
Nursing
Organizational
Outline
Pages
Paper
Presentation
Questions
Questionnaire
Reference
Response
Response
School
Subject
Slides
Sources
Student
Support
Times New Roman
Title
Topics
Word
Write
Writing

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services