What corrective actions would you have imposed at any point during this acquisition process?

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Learning Goal: I’m working on a management writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.Analyze the events in the GAO protest documentationActions and develop your positions on the questions below. DO NOT cut and paste the case information into your paper. This assignment requires you to address what happened, identify potential reasons for the issues that arose, and how the issues could have been avoided.Your submission must be 3-4 pages (not including cover page and works cited), MLA format with appropriate sources cited, and be written consistent with graduate level work and we expect absolutely no spelling, grammar, usage, or formatting mistakes. Your submission will be graded using the rubric shown.Questions to Address (DO NOT simply answer these questions; rather, the answers should be reflected in your written analysis of the case). Was the cancellation of the solicitation improper if it reasonably reflected all of the agency’s needs? When is an agency expected or permitted to cancel a solicitation?
Was the cancellation of the solicitation improper if it was due to flaws related to a lack of required acquisition planning? Are there any circumstances that permit an acquisition to proceed without acquisition planning?
Was the sole source task order and extensions thereto proper, since the extensions were apparently only required due to the agency’s failure to engage in reasonable acquisition planning?
How could this situation have been avoided? What corrective actions would you have imposed at any point during this acquisition process?
RubricCase Study AnalysisCase Study AnalysisCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocumentation10 to >8.0 ptsSuperiorLocated all or most of the pertinent details and addressed them within the paper.8 to >6.0 ptsSatisfactoryLocated and discussed many of the pertinent details. Appropriate citations provided.6 to >0.0 ptsMarginalLocated and discussed only a few of the pertinent details. Few relevant sources cited.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryFailed to locate many of the pertinent details. No sources cited. Cut and paste throughout.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis25 to >18.75 ptsSuperiorProvided references to support positions, analysis draws logical conclusions, and provided evidence of higher level thought.18.75 to >9.0 ptsSatisfactoryProvided some references to support positions, analysis mostly draws logical conclusions but not entirely fleshed out, and provided some evidence of higher level thought.9 to >0.0 ptsMarginalDid not provide much analysis that demonstrated critical thinking skills. One or two instances of merely regurgitated case study information.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryProvided no references to support positions, analysis is incomplete or lacking, or the submission provided little evidence of higher level thought.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness and thoroughness15 ptsSuperiorSubmitted on-time with no mistakes or omissions.10 ptsSatisfactorySubmitted on-time with few mistakes or omissions.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDid not complete and submit required document on time and/or had many mistakes. Writing not consistent with graduate level expectations.15 pts

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services