The essays must be between 600-750 words and must be submitted via turnitin.com

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

The essays must be between 600-750 words and must be submitted via turnitin.com dropbox in iCollege. The essays are worth up to 100 points. Additional details are available within the lesson modules. You may accumulate up to 200 points for this part of the course. Please note that these essays are not research papers. They will ask you to evaluate arguments and provide your own arguments in support of an assigned topic. Essays submitted to this course must be originally written for this course, and may not be reused in any other course, or any other section of this course.
Do you think it is possible for good people to do bad things? Or, alternatively, is it possible for bad people to do good things? For your first essay, clearly state, and then defend, either an affirmative or negative answer to one of those questions. In thinking about your thesis, you might consider what it means to be a good or bad person, and in addition, what it means to do a good or bad thing; conversely, is being good merely a case of acting good. Your answer should rely heavily on at least three of the theorists that we’ve read so far in the course, including, for example
The Kantian Categorical Imperative
Mill’s Utilitarianism
Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics
Review the course schedule and Modules 0-6 for a complete reading list. Please carefully review the documents called “Midterm Essay Requirements” and “Midterm Essay Criteria”, which are available from the course home page, by clicking the “Essay Topics” link.
You have been provided everything you need to complete this assignment. Everything in your essay should come from the textbook, and the module resources. Students who rely on external sources will not receive a grade higher than a “D”. Students are absolutely advised to resist the urge to type “can good people do bad things” into your search engine; the sources you find will almost certainly be low quality, will be irrelevant to the course material, and will cause your grade to be lower than it otherwise would be.
Paper One Requirements
Your paper should include:
A short introductory paragraph, with a clear thesis statement (e.g., I shall argue that Rawls’ argument is influenced by … because …). Your thesis should almost always be the last sentence of your introductory paragraph.
A short, charitable reconstruction of the argument as presented by the philosopher whose position you rely on (you may, but need not, use standard premise / conclusion form).
An brief explanation, in your own words, of the position that you’re describing (such as the Categorical Imperative, Justice as Fairness, etc.)
An original argument, in which you make the case that answers the question, based on the philosophical position under investigation.
A suitable concluding paragraph.
Make reference to, and discuss meaningfully, at least three of the philosophers that we’ve read so far in the course.
At least two sources, and zero internet sources. If a source is not printed in a physical book or journal form (even if it is also available on the internet) it is not a suitable source, and should not be referenced in your essay. Essays that rely on the internet to make their central argument, rather than high quality class materials, will not receive a grade higher than a D. (Read that sentence again to be sure you understand it).
No direct quotations. It is never necessary to directly quote any author. When it is important to rely on someone else’s ideas, simply explain the position which he/she is defending. It is, however, necessary to cite all authors whose ideas you reference. Thus, if you begin a sentence with, e.g., “According to Plato…”, you should end that sentence with a citation. Essays that include “direct quotations” will not receive a grade higher than a D. (Read that sentence again, too, to be sure you understand it).
A clear and complete bibliography
This assignment is due via the dropbox in iCollege by Sunday at 11:59PM ET. Review the schedule of assignments on the syllabus for specific due dates and times.
Criteria for Evaluation:
Your paper will be evaluated according to the following criteria:
Papers must demonstrate an understanding of the arguments being discussed.
Papers must demonstrate a mastery of the relevant concepts regarding the philosophical problem.
Don’t worry about getting the ‘right’ answer. Rather, concentrate on the quality of reasoning used in your evaluation.
Your grade will reflect the degree to which these rules and general requirements have been observed.
Papers with frequent grammatical or spelling errors, or which otherwise do not reflect good quality academic writing, will be returned with no grade. If you don’t know the difference between `their’ and `there’, or the correct use of the semicolon, make an appointment with the writing studio before you submit your paper. http://writingstudio.gsu.edu/
All papers should be double spaced, between 600-750 words, and submitted as a doc or docx file. Include the required cover page as the first page of your paper, and your last name as a header or footer on every page. Include a bibliography or references section. Format citations according to APA or MLA citation style.
Grammarly is a web-based, automated proofreading and revision tool that provides grammar, spelling, and citation monitoring. This instructional tool allows students to submit their papers and presentations with confidence while developing their writing skills and revision practices. Grammarly is free for students, faculty, and staff who register an account using their Campus email address, or using our activation key available in iCollege.
Review details and signup here: http://technology.gsu.edu/technology-services/it-services/training-and-learning-resources/grammarly/
Please report any problems, or share your experience using the Grammarly tool, by posting to the Question and Answer forum.
2. You should try very very hard to resist the urge to type “can a good person do a bad thing” into Google. What you will find there is irrelevant to our course, and so will either (1) waste a good deal of your time, while you learn that what I just told you is true, or (2) cause you to focus on a theme that is outside the scope of this assignment. The course materials provides you with everything you need to answer this question successfully. Alternatively, what you will find on the internet is essays or web pages with a title that relates to our topic, but written for an entirely different purpose. As someone who reads hundreds of papers on this topic, I can tell the difference between an “A” paper written by a student in this course who is familiar with class material and who has thought carefully about the answer, versus a “D” paper written by a student who looked to the internet to find out the answer. You definitely want to be one of the former, and not the latter. This is an assignment designed to evaluate your mastery of the course material; it is not an assignment designed to discover what you can find on the internet that corresponds tangentially to the assignment topic.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services