How are they related to each other – technique-wise and system-wise?

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Pick a recent survey of the field so you can quickly gain an overview
Pick papers that are related to each other in some ways and/or that are in the same field so that you can write a meaningful survey out of them,
write :
1) Intro :
• Motivation (why is it important?), may be general or specific
• Background (what is the history of this issue?)
• Objectives (what are you trying to accomplish?)
• Scope (what is the focus of your analysis?)
• Limitations (what constraints did you face?)
• Content (what is in the report?)
• Organization (how the report is organized?)
technique section
Survey details
• Present the surveyed techniques using the classification scheme in detail.
• Identify the trends in the surveyed area. Give evidences for your decision.
• See points 3, 4, 5, 6 below.
Conclusions and possible future work
• Summarize the conclusions of your survey.
References
• List all the citations referenced in your paper.
• See point 7 below.
(3) Identify the main types of techniques in the field. When are they being created? How are they related to each other – technique-wise and system-wise?
(4) Compare the different techniques/system:
1. Can you distinguish the main differences between the different techniques?
2. What sort of reasoning mechanisms are they using? Is there a progress trend in the different report of research, e.g. in terms of time and in terms of technology improvements?
3. Can you compare the performance of the different types of techniques?
4. What will be the evaluation criteria that you will be using for comparing the different technologies?
5. In addition to text description on those topics above, can you produce a few relevant summary tables on the comparison of the different tools and techniques?
(5) Mention concrete system being developed using those techniques and give details about them, e.g. who developed them, and details of their, e.g. their functions, specialization areas, the context of their working/testing application, developing history (who develop them and the motivation of development), technical background (which type of techniques used), specific techniques used and implementation details, technical strength and weakness, etc.
(6) When you write the survey, you can write the previous works in terms of temporal order and technology progress order – e.g. A technique/work was developed first to resolve problem X, however, as it does not resolve Y; another technology/work was developed later on to resolve Y, but it does not resolve Z. Therefore a later technology/work was developed to resolve Z, but it does not resolve…. And so on.
If there is not an obvious temporal or progress trend order, you can report on a set of related technologies/works to give a description of what they do, their strength and weakness, and the gaps they do not fill – often these gaps are the gaps that you would like to resolve – if you were to report on your own work in the same paper – you can then go on describing your work in more details in a following sections.
(7) Citing a reference in your survey:
When you refer a paper in your literature review, remember to cite the full info about the paper, including author names, paper title, publication details and page numbers, etc, see an example reference below:
[1] Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A., Toward the Next Generation of
Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible
Extensions, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,
Vol. 17, No. 6. (June 2005), pp. 734-749.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services