COIT20249: Development of Professional Skills – Portfolio Writing Assessment Answer

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

 1AFDJB
Code: COIT20249
Development of Professional Skills Portfolio Writing Assessment Answer
Assignment Task: COIT20249
Portfolio 1 – PF1
Description: This assignment aims to develop awareness among students of becoming a lifelong learner. Students need to use the ARE process in this assignment. Students also require to write a reflective analysis of their experience of doing this task.
Requirements:

To succeed in an ever-changing ICT profession, it is very important to become a
lifelong learner
. Do some background research, evaluate the information and write about your understanding of being a lifelong learner and why it is important for ICT professional (write with an example).

Analyze the information you gathered in step 1, do some further research, evaluate the information and write in your own words how you can become an effective lifelong learner (include your plan for that).

Write your reflection on this task. Your reflection should include the followings:

Briefly describe how you did the task (about the process). b. Evaluate and write a brief description of your experience of doing this task. Was this task easy or hard? Justify your answer briefly (your justification may include if your past knowledge helped you doing this task or if it was a totally new experience for you). c. Analyse critically and explain what have you learned from this task? If you think you 
did not learn anything then give a reason why you think so? d. How this experience will help you in the future? If you think that this experience will not help you in the future, then provide your reasoning for that as well.

Portfolio 2 – PF2
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This activity MUST be completed as an in-class assessment in Week 7 for internally enrolled students. The Unit Coordinator will contact Distance students to organise completion of the activity in Week 7. Internal students are expected to arrive on time AND be present in class for the WHOLE workshop. Latecomers may be barred from entry as late arrivals could disturb the other students who are completing the assessment. People who disturb other students may also be asked to leave. This activity will be completed under conditions similar to those applied during exams.
This assessment activity must be completed and submitted by internal students during the class in Week 7. Any students who cannot attend their workshop (in-class or online as scheduled by your local lecturer) will receive zero (0) marks. Please note that in line with the University’s Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework), work, other assessments or family commitments will not be an acceptable reason for being late or missing the class. Distance students also must plan for completing this assessment in Week 7. You will have to provide acceptable evidence if there is an unavoidable reason why you cannot complete in Week 7. All students must be aware that you may not receive timely feedback for the Report if you do not complete this activity in Week 7.
Requirements
By now you should start organizing your ideas and arguments for the Report (Assessment item 3). To ensure that you submit the best Report possible, it is important that you seek constructive feedback from your local lecturer. PF2 requires you to demonstrate your understanding of the report case study requirements and the type of information you need to gather through the research process. This will be marked and returned to you in time for you to use the feedback to improve your Report.
You must not use any pre-prepared materials for this assessment as that will breach the requirements for an in-class assessment. Your local lecturer will provide further details. You will be provided a template to complete the assessment. Internal students must upload and submit this assessment during the class when directed the local lecturer and or supervisor of the test. Distance students must complete the submission at a time advised by the Unit Coordinator. Any assessments which are not submitted for grading as directed will not be marked as late submissions cannot be accepted.
There are three parts to PF2:

There will be two random questions about the report case study for the current term.

In Week 6 you will be provided with details of two references relevant to the technology topic covered in the report. You are expected to read and understand the contents of those references before coming to the Week 7 workshop. You need to review and evaluate those references using the Triple R framework and the Annotated Bibliographies work covered in Weeks 2 and 3 of the Term. There will be random questions from the materials provided.

The final question requires you to paraphrase a short paragraph from a provided reference. You will be provided with a particular paragraph and you will have to paraphrase it during the time you complete PF2 in class. The paragraph should be paraphrased and structured according to the paraphrasing and paragraph structuring guidelines covered in ALC sessions.

PF2 responses for section 1 and 2
must relate
to the case study described in the Report Assessment Specification (Assessment 3) and the provided references. Section 3 must focus on the given paragraph – random selection. Otherwise, these sections will receive a 0 mark and no feedback.

Marking Criteria

Brief Analysis of the Report Case Study (Assessment 3 Specification) as set out in part 1.

Review and evaluate two references as set out in part 2 of requirements above, using the Triple R framework and/or Annotated Bibliographies framework.

Paraphrase a paragraph as given in Part 3 of Requirements.

This COIT20249: Development of Professional Skills Assessment has been solved by our Management experts at TVAssignmentHelp. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services