Task3 – Positive Psychology

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I don’t understand this Psychology question and need help to study.

The Happiness Advantage

Watch TEDTalks:

Read Achor’s Seven Principles, followed by explaining one of the principles in a two paragraph essay.

Upload your paper/essay (with citation) into the Moodle site. * Ensure that you work is presented in APA writing style, in addition to being grammatically correct, with good spelling, and punctuation. For more information on APA writing Style visit:

https://www.umuc.edu/students/academic-integrity/vail-tutorial.cfmEngaging the Organization in the Change Process: nursing assignment help services
I’m working on a Management question and need guidance to help me study.

Change involves moving from one circumstance or situation to another. Since organizations involve many components and systems, the ability to effectively communicate any changes throughout the organization becomes a critical component of employee morale and commitment.

In this scenario, assume you are serving as a Human Resource Manager/Professional of a company within the KSA and announced that your organization must lay off 20% of total employees. Discuss how you would advise management about how best to communicate this message. Include the following areas: the specific process they should follow, the format/channels they should use, the components to include in the message.

Draft a short, one-paragraph message that you believe should be sent to the organization to announce these layoffs.

During the week, review and offer suggestions to your fellow students on how they can modify their message to make it more palatable to employees, offering suggested words and approaches that they may consider.

direction
APA style guidelines. 2-3 references 6-8 paragraphs(POEM) I need you to edit and some of the suggestions with red..
I need help with a English question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

I would like you to add and be more creative adding and editing some of it …

Here is the original requirements :

Poem 2: The Following Story

Construct a narrative or in some way tell a story in a poem. Your poem should contain between 10 and 30 lines and should respond to the concepts on lineation discussed in Chapters 3 and 4 of Writing Poems. Try to be economical with your language—that is, try to cut unnecessary words and repetition from Poem 2. Also, try to keep all clichés out of Poem 2.

Additionally, Poem 2 may not rhyme.Capstone: Critical Analysis I
Help me study for my Psychology class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

Often there are many contributing causes in the development of a specific problem/issue. These causes may be complex and may involve individuals, institutions, and/or environmental factors, for example. This complexity increases the difficulty in creating a solution for the problem. Thus, prior to developing solutions, there must be a critical analysis of the problem/issue. The analysis must address the many potential causes of the problem/issue and determine which had the most impact on its development. Critical analysis relies on the literature and resources that address the specific problem. In this Application, you will focus on a critical analysis of the problem utilizing the findings from the literature collected in previous weeks.

To prepare:
Review the resources you collected and summarized in Weeks 4 and 5. Think about the causes of the problem/issue; effectiveness of inclusive classrooms, and consider who or what are the major contributors to this problem. Think about the impacts of the problem.
The assignment:

In 3 pages, discuss the following points:
Briefly describe the problem/issue and the problem statement you developed. Identify the major contributors to the problem (who, what) and briefly explain how they contribute to/cause the problem. Explain at least two causes of the problem. Explain at least two effects of the problem.
Support your response using the appropriate references. APA Format. 3 pages.4-2 Discussion: Peer Review: assignment help philadelphia
I need help with a Psychology question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

After reading several of the articles from the Nature debate on peer review (attached), what do you think is the best way that articles in psychology should be selected for publication? What are the key strengths of your suggested method? The weaknesses? When responding to your classmates, offer an alternative perspective to their suggestion or point out factors that they did not consider.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document (attached).

please also reply in one-two paragraphs to the following students posts regarding the same topic!

STUDENT ONE:

One of the processes I think is quite interesting is the open-peer-review. This takes papers through several rounds of edits of an initial scrutinization and then the traditional review (“Overview: Nature’s peer review trial,” 2006). I am fond of the hybrid system of peer review because it allows for an editor to submit it to the Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (ETAI) so that members of the peer community can make comments without anonymity (“Systems: Opening up the process,” 2006). In addition, they ensure that the material is relevant to the criteria of ETAI and it denies the submission of pseudoscience papers. The discussion takes approximately three months with means to extend. Afterwards, the authors can then make edits to their paper or continue for a decision from an expert to review the final version and determine if it should cease movement or move forward. I feel what makes this process so efficient is that it uses the internet to make the appropriate edits and set the author up for success. Additionally, all comments are open and allows the author to see different perspectives and how they arrived at the final review edits. This is important when considering if they should continue with their paper or find a different route entirely. However, as the article suggests, authors must expedite responses to criticism or risk having their journal rejected in an open forum (“Systems: Opening up the process,” 2006). This, as you can imagine, can be very difficult for someone who committed time to the development of the research journal. The stress over the course of three months or longer can also be difficult for the author as they may have to constantly defend their position. The article also says that the authors are more cautious when submitting a journal because of the public criticism and because any discussion can quickly lead to a rejection. I live on honest and straight-forwardness because it allows someone to know immediately that they must improve. These discussions are either a make or break for some authors which is a weakness depending on the type of person submitting the journal.

ReferencesOverview: Nature’s peer review trial. (2006). Retrieved April 2, 2019, from https://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05535.htmlSystems: Opening up the process. (2006). Retrieved April, 2, 2019, from https://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04994.html

STUDENT TWO:

In the last year I read a book title The Dispossessed about a physicist who runs away from an extremist socialist moon to the capitalist planet the moon orbits so that he can continue his life’s work in physics. The reason his work could not be continued on his home was the “government” (this society did not believe in governments but in the collective people) would not publish his work because his peers did not understand the science behind it nor did they want him to get all the credit for the science (Le Guin, 1974). While this is an extreme, this kind of thinking may be at play when researchers don’t get published in peer-review journals. According to the article Analysing the purpose of the peer review, 90% of articles submitted to the New England Journal of Medicine and the Lancet are rejected (Nature, 2006). This is a staggering number. While I understand not all manuscripts can (or should) be published, more should be offered to the researchers who have devoted their time to their research to better our population as a whole.

A method of publishing that seems to make the most sense to me would be a combination of the traditional peer review method we all know, and a method discussed in the article Scientific publishers should let their online readers become reviews which includes comment sections and rating systems for online peer reviewed articles (Nature, 2006). Having manuscripts that are reviewed by peers prevents wildly mistaken data from being published regularly but online comments and rating systems allows the public to have a say in what the article content is about and how it was created as well. This creates accountability for all stakeholders involved, including the readers. The only weakness in this system would be the internet trolls who would comment on articles negatively, or nonsensically, just for the sake of chaos. This may be the price to pay for having more involvement in the peer review process.

References

Le Guin, U. K. (1974). The Dispossessed. New York, NY: Harper Voyager.

Nature. (2006). Analysing the purpose of the peer review. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature04990

Nature. (2006). Scientific publishers should let their onine readers become reviews. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature04992

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services