Genre Analysis

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m studying for my English class and need an explanation.

The Genre Analysis assignment requires you to gather several examples of one type of genre (e.g. lab report, business plan, brochure, flyer, business letter, professional email, etc.) and compare across each example for the conventions that define that specific genre. In the workplace, you will be required to write in several different genres. It is important that you are able to recognize the conventions of the genre in which you are working and make the appropriate rhetorical choices to communicate your message, while addressing reader-user expectations.

To complete the Genre Analysis assignment, first collect 3-5 artifacts (representative samples) of the genre you’ve selected. Again, each example should be from the same type of genre.

Next, use the Analyzing Genres document (below) to investigate and interpret patterns across artifacts. What similarities in structure, word choice, social expectations, and other features do you notice?

The final step is to write a brief (100-150) synopsis of your findings. As a writer, what do you need to know to be able to write effectively in this genre? What will reader-users expect from this genre?

The deliverables for this assignment are 1) Your responses to the Analyzing Genres document, 2) Your synopsis, and 3) The artifacts you collects (submitted as either links and/or file uploads.

Note: When considering the language most commonly used, this does not refer to English, French, Spanish, etc. Instead, look for keywords, key phrases, and/or patterns of speech commonly used across your artifacts.

MLA

No more than 3 pages.

Please have done it in the Word document. thanksPHI208 week 5 final paper.Ethical Reasoning paper: nursing essay help
I need an explanation for this Philosophy question to help me study.

This course has three written assignments that build upon one another and are designed to take you step-by-step through a process of writing a paper that identifies an ethical question, examines the context, issues, and arguments surrounding the question, and attempts to defend an answer to that question using strong moral reasoning.

In the Week 1 assignment, “Ethical Question,” you chose an ethical question, provided an introduction, a position statement and supporting reason, and an opposing position statement and supporting reason.

In the Week 3 assignment, “Applying an Ethical Theory,” you explained utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics, including its core moral principle or ideal, and applied that theory to the topic by demonstrating how its principles would support a particular position on your ethical question.

In this final written assignment, you will combine what you have done in these two exercises by examining an ethical issue and defending your own position on an ethical question regarding that issue.

This final written assignment should be written in essay form with the following clearly labeled sections:
Introduction Ethical Argument Explanation and Defense Objection and Response Conclusion
The paper should be between 1,300 and 1,500 words, utilize three scholarly resources, and include a title page and reference page.

Part 1: Introduction

In this section of the paper, you will begin with your ethical question, introduce the topic and paper, and close with a thesis statement.
The ethical question may be the same as your Week 3 written assignment (“Applying an Ethical Theory”) or a revised version of it. The introduction should be revised in a way that reflects your additional thinking on the issue and question. End this section with a thesis statement that states your position on the issue (the answer to the ethical question you believe is strongest) and provides a brief summary of the main ideas you will be presenting in the paper. Please see the assignment guidance for examples of thesis statements.
Place the introduction under the Part 1: Introduction heading.

Part 2: Ethical Argument

In this section of the paper, you will present the strongest argument you can in support of the position you have stated in your introduction.
This will be similar to the “supporting reasons” you offered in the first assignment; however, this argument should reflect your research into the key ethical issues that need to be identified and addressed, the arguments on different sides of this problem, and the theories of moral reasoning we have studied in the class (you will discuss the specific details and implications of the moral theories in the next two sections). You can think of this as a summary of the main argument you would give if you were an attorney trying to convince a jury of your position.
Place this information under the Part 2: Ethical Argument heading.

Part 3: Explanation and Defense

In this section, you will explain and defend your argument by drawing on the moral theory that aligns most closely with the argument you presented in Part 2. This may be the same theory you discussed in your second assignment, but it may also be a different theory.
You must first explain the theory in general terms similar to how you explained a theory in your second assignment, including a brief account of the historical background of the theory and the philosopher(s) associated with it and general overview of the core moral ideal or principle of the theory, including the way it guides and constrains moral reasoning. You should then clearly show how your argument represents an application of that form of moral reasoning. In other words, if the argument you present in Part 2 is utilitarian, deontological, or virtue-based (teleological), you will want to explain utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics in general terms, then explain how your argument from Part 2 reflects or draws upon the core principles and values of that theory. Please refer to the Week 3 assignment instructions for directions on how to explain and apply the moral theory.
Place this section under the Part 3: Explanation and Defense heading.

Part 4: Objection and Response

In this section of the paper, you will present the strongest objection you can to your argument, and briefly defend that objection by appealing to a different ethical theory than the one you focused on in Part 3.
Briefly explain the core moral ideal or principle of the theory and how that could be the basis of an objection to your argument. For instance, if you explained and defended your own argument by applying the principles of virtue ethics, you could raise an objection from the perspective of utilitarianism by briefly explaining the core utilitarian principle and how applying that principle could lead someone to a different conclusion than the one you are defending. Next, you should respond to the objection by explaining why it is not strong enough to undermine the main argument in defense of your position. See the assignment guidance for suggestions on how to effectively respond to the objection.
Place this section under the Part 4: Objection and Response heading.

Part 5: Conclusion

In this section of the paper, provide a summary of what you have done in the paper by briefly describing what you accomplished in each of the above sections.

Place this section under the Part 5: Conclusion heading.

Resource Requirement

You must use at least three scholarly resources, only one of which may be the textbook. In other words, you must use at least two scholarly resources in addition to the textbook.

Acceptable ways of using a source include providing a quotation, summary, or paraphrase; merely providing a citation, especially when it is unclear how or where the text supports your claim, is not sufficient.

If you need help with finding additional resources or are unsure about whether a particular resource will count toward the requirement, please contact your instructor.

For sources to count toward the resources requirement, they must be cited within the text of your paper and on the reference page. Sources that are listed on the references page but not cited within the paper do not count toward fulfilling the resources requirement.

In your paper,
Introduce the topic and paper. Provide a thesis statement. Present an argument in support of the position. Defend the argument by explaining and applying the ethical theory that most closely aligns with the argument. Present an objection to the argument by appealing to a different ethical theory. Respond to the objection. Provide a conclusion that describes what was accomplished in each of the sections of the paper.
The Ethical Reasoning Final Paper
Must be 1,300 to 1,500 words in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)resource. Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted
For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).
Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance. Must use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) guide. Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.Please choose one of the following actors, and one of their films listed. Use only actors and films listed. After viewing the film, share your reaction to the physical and vocal choices the actor made in the film, their level of commitment to creating a c
I need help with a Film question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

the paper has to be paragraphed

Lillian Gish: Broken Blossoms (1919), Way Down East (1920)

Max Schreck: Nosferatu (1922)

Harold Lloyd: Safety Last (1923)

Charlie Chaplin: The Kid (1921), The Gold Rush (1925), City Light (1931), Modern Times (1936), The Great Dictator (1940)

Buster Keaton: The General (1927), Steamboat Bill Jr. (1928)

Janet Gaynor: Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans (1927), A Star is Born (1938)

Louise Brooks: Diary of a Lost Girl (1929), Pandora’s Box (1929)

Bela Lugosi: Dracula (1931)

Boris Karloff: Frankenstein (1931)

Joan Crawford: Grand Hotel (1932)

Paul Muni: I Am A Fugitive from a Chain Gang (1932), Scarface (1932)

James Cagney: Public Enemy (1931), Angels with Dirty Faces (1938), Yankee Doodle Dandy (1942), White Heat (1949)

Greta Garbo: Grand Hotel (1932), Ninotchka (1939)

Mae West: I’m No Angel (1933), She Done Him Wrong (1933)

The Marx Brothers: Duck Soup (1933), A Night at The Opera (1935)

Clark Gable: It Happened One Night (1934), Gone With the Wind (1939)

Claudette Colbert: It Happened One Night (1934), Imitation of Life (1934), Since You Went Away (1944)

Louise Beavers: Imitation of Life (1934)

Shirley Temple: Bright Eyes (1934), The Little Colonel (1935), Heidi (1937), The Little Princess (1939)

Robert Donat: The 39th Steps (1935), Goodbye Mr. Chips (1939)

Fred Astaire: Top Hat (1935), Swing Time (1936)

Ginger Rogers: Top Hat (1935), Swing Time (1936), Stage Door (1937), I’ll Be Seeing You (1944)

Robert Donat: The 39th Steps (1935), Goodbye Mr. Chips (1939)

Gary Cooper: Mr. Deeds Goes to Town (1936), The Pride of the Yankees (1942)

Katharine Hepburn: Bringing Up Baby (1938), Adam’s Rib (1949)

Fredric March: A Star is Born (1938)

Errol Flynn: The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938), Gentleman Jim (1942)

Cary Grant: Bringing Up Baby (1938), Notorious (1946)

James Stewart: Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939), The Shop Around the Corner (1940), Destry Rides Again (1939)

Charles Laughton: The Hunchback of Norte Dame (1939)

John Wayne: Stagecoach (1939), Red River (1948)

Merle Oberon: Wuthering Heights (1939)

Lawrence Olivier: Wuthering Heights (1939), Rebecca (1940)

Vivien Leigh: Gone With the Wind (1939)

Hattie McDaniel: Gone With the Wind (1939) Since You Went Away (1944)

Marlene Dietrich: Destry Rides Again (1939)

Burgess Meredith, Lon Chaney Jr: Of Mice and Men (1939)

Bette Davis: Dark Victory (1939), The Little Foxes (1941), Now Voyager (1942)

Joan Fontaine: Rebecca (1940), Suspicion (1941)

Judith Anderson: Rebecca (1940)

Margaret Sullavan: The Shop Around the Corner (1940)

Irene Dunne: My Favorite Wife (1940), I Remember Mama (1948)

Humphrey Bogart: The Maltese Falcon (1941), Casablanca (1942), To Have and Have Not (1944), Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948)

Ingrid Bergman: Casablanca (1942), Spellbound (1945), Notorious (1946)

Henry Fonda: The Grapes of Wrath (1940), My Darling Clementine (1946)

Orson Welles: Citizen Kane (1941), The Third Man (1949)

Agnes Moorehead: Citizen Kane (1941), Since You Went Away (1944), Johnny Belinda (1948)

Greer Garson, Teresa Wright: Mrs Miniver (1942)

Ethel Waters: Cabin in the Sky (1943)

Judy Garland: Meet Me in St. Louis (1944), Easter Parade (1948)

Gene Tierney: Laura (1944), Leave Her to Heaven (1945)

Lena Horne: Stormy Weather (1944)

Gregory Peck: Spellbound (1945), Gentleman’s Agreement (1947)

Edward G. Robinson: Double Indemnity (1944), Key Largo (1948)

Lauren Bacall: To Have and Have Not (1944)

Barbara Stanwyck: Double Indemnity (1944), Christmas in Connecticut (1945)

Robert Mitchum: Out of the Past (1947)

Edmund Gwenn: Miracle on 34th Street (1947)

Barbara Bel Geddes: I Remember Mama (1948)

John Wayne: Stagecoach (1939), Red River (1948)

Montgomery Clift: Red River (1948), The Heiress (1949)

Jane Wyman: Johnny Belinda (1948)

Spencer Tracy: Adam’s Rib (1949)

Olivia de Havilland: The Heiress (1949)I need this criminal justice paper written
I’m stuck on a Law question and need an explanation.

This assignment will define and compare ethics and morality.

Research, select, and describe an incident involving a real ethical concern or event related to criminal justice (e.g., corruption in a police department, judicial bribery, smuggling contraband into prisons by correctional officers, etc.). Students must utilize the Library Subject Guide for Criminal Justice (See Content) to conduct independent and unique research.

Organization:
Part One: An opening paragraph describing your topic and ultimate conclusion Part Two: Brief description of the selected event and the ethical issues involved you choose to write about Part Three: Conclusions based on your research and class readings as to the consequences of unethical behavior to the system, the society, and the individual. The following issues must be covered within the report:
Cultural issues, (may include all areas of diversity including race, gender, sexual orientation and occupational culture) Historical context, include your theories on why the situation occurred Moral courage, (For example, – was there a particularly courageous individual involved?) Politics (Note, in this context “politics” referrers to the personal and/or group dynamics within a particular organization, community or similar setting. It does NOT relate to political parties or affiliation with any political party.)
Format Requirements
750 to 1,000 words Double space 12 pt. font 1” margins Use APA narrative and reference page citations for all sources Include reference page using American Psychological Association (APA) format guidelines (not included in word count)
Additionally:
Create a cover page for your assignment (not included in word count) Include your name Course title and number Project title Date of submissionits a small essay 1- to 2 pages its a small essay 1- to 2 pages its a small essay 1- to 2 pages: my nursing assignment help
I’m studying and need help with a English question to help me learn.

Length: about 300-600 words (about 1-2 pages)

For your 2nd Writing Exercise, listen to Episode #2 (“88 Days Later”) of the podcast series MARED AND KAREN: THE WVU COED MURDERS (in the attached link). Then, write a response to the episode. This response can describe anything from the episode that stood out to you, as well as your reasons for why that particular aspect of the episode caught your interest.

NOTE: The first link leads to the episode itself. The second link leads to some photographs that add additional context to the episode.

https://www.coedmurders.com/blog/2019/1/12/episode-2-88-days-later

http://kromatic.media/episode-2-extras

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services