Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
I’m stuck on a Film question and need an explanation.
SOURCE EVALUATION – Mini Paper 2
INSTRUCTIONS
Choose ONE topic and examine the TWO websites listed as possible sources for that topic. One of them is credible, one of them is not. You will determine which one of the two websites is the more reliable source for that topic.
You will turn in a short essay that identifies which website is most reliable and compares the two sites. Your short essay should compare these elements:
MESSAGE: What is the main message of each website?
Is the information fact, opinion, personal stories?
Is the point-of-view objective and impartial?
Is the language free of emotion-rousing words and bias?
Can you verify any of the information through a web search?
2. AUTHOR: What do you know about the author/s?
Is the name of the author/creator/organization on the page?
Are their credentials listed (occupation, years of experience, position or education)?
Do you think the author is qualified to write on the topic?
Is there contact information, such as an email address or phone number
Does a web search of the author or organization reveal any information about possible bias?
3.AUDIENCE: Who is the intended audience?
Scholarly audience, professionals, or experts
General public
Other audience
4. PURPOSE: What is the purpose of this website?
Is the purpose to inform and educate, or persuade, entertain, confuse, evoke emotion, make money, get you to behave or believe a certain way?
Write a couple of sentences about each comparison: Message, Author, Audience, and Purpose
TOPIC CHOICES – Choose ONE.
You will compare the two websites to determine which one is more reliable.
A. ALIEN LIFE:
1. https://www.seti.org/ (Links to an external site.)
2. https://www.aliensthetruth.com/ (Links to an external site.)
B. CHEMISTRY
1. Dihydrogen Monoxide Research Division http://www.dhmo.org/ (Links to an external site.)
2. Carbon Monoxide https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/drug-development/Carbon-monoxide-deadly-researchers-want/97/i45 (Links to an external site.)
C. EATING EGGS:
1. https://www.incredibleegg.orgShort Response: nursing assignment help
Need help with my Political Science question – I’m studying for my class.
In no less than two typed double-spaced pages with 1-inch margins and Times New Roman 12 point font pages answer one of the questions listed below.Please avoid long quotes or paraphrases as I am looking not just for your demonstration that you know the material but also (and more importantly) for your own opinion on the subject. Please clearly indicate on your paper which question you are answering.Submit your response to TurnItIn on Blackboard.Papers will be graded on grammar and style, length, the ability to correctly summarize the arguments in the works discussed, and the ability to synthesize a personal argument based on the works discussed. Outside sources other than the materials read for class are not allowed, nor are any collaborative efforts with other students.
What is the Racial Contract?How is it different from the Social Contract?Why is it (as Mills asserts) a key feature of the global political system yet is unrecognized as such?Answer these questions and then select any two of Mill’s theses to expand upon further.How does he support the theses you chose?Do you agree with his assessment? Compare and contrast the writings of Socrates, Thoreau, and King on the topic of Civil Disobedience.What are their arguments about what you should do when you feel like a law is unjust?Which argument do you find most compelling and why?PolSci7 Week 2 Discussion: Collective Security or Balance of Power
I’m stuck on a Political Science question and need an explanation.
Question: If asked to advise the president of the United States on which approach should be pursued in American foreign policy, collective security or a balance of power, what would you advise? If you believe that collective security is better policy, explain why in the Collective Security forum, supporting your argument with source-cited historical facts. If you believe that the balance of power system is better, explain why in the Balance of Power forum. Post your essay using source cited facts to support your argument.
Required Text: Perspectives on International Relations: Power, Institutions, and Ideas, 6th ed (Links to an external site.). — Henry R. Nau, Sage/CQ Press, 2018. ISBN: 978-1506396224. Part II: The Contemporary International System.
Guidelines:
(1) A clear introduction that addresses directly the question posed by the instructor; (2) A body of factual examples that support your thesis; these examples may be drawn from either the assigned readings or footnoted sources researched independently by the student; Wikipedia is not an appropriate source for academic essays; (3) A coherent paragraph structure that highlights your main points; (4) Appropriate citations for materials drawn from the works of others; plagiarized threads will be penalized; and (5) should be approximately 600 words in length.criminal hw
Can you help me understand this Law question?
John Smith is a naturalized American citizen from Afghanistan. However on his application for citizenship, he left out some things or made some things up-
That he fought with the Taliban at Tora Bora against U.S. forces in late 2001.
That he claimed on his application that he fought against the Taliban with the Northen Alliance.
That his name isn’t really “John Smith”
That he isn’t even from Afghanistan, but is a fugitive opium smuggler from Tajikistan.
Does John have any problems if DHS ever discovers these deceptions? Explain.
Are these all really problems?Two Essays: nursing assignment help
I’m studying for my English class and need an explanation.
Two different answers, Two essays, of the same subject. Three pages each and double spaced. Please have three quotes at least from the book “A World of Ideas” 10th or 11th edition for Lee A. Jacobus, you must have the book to complete this. Don’t compare and contrast, please. Express how they talk about war, love, leadership, trustworthy, etc… Here is the what is required:-
Lao-Tzu & Machiavelli
Both of these historic authors advise their readers on appropriate means of leadership, while also encouraging certain behaviors.
In Thoughts from the Tao-Te Ching Lao-Tzu advises that “The Master does his job and then stops. He understands that the universe is forever out of control, and that trying to dominate events goes against the current of the Tao” (63).
And in dealings with others Tzu says that “If a country is governed with tolerance, the people are comfortable and honest” (66).
And in leadership he says “If you want to govern the people, you must place yourself below them” (69).
While in Machiavelli’s The Qualities of the Prince he advises that “it is necessary for a prince who wishes to maintain his position to learn how not to be good, and to use this knowledge or not to use it according to necessity” (78).
And in dealings with others he explains that “since men are a sorry lot and will not keep their promises to you, you likewise need not keep yours to them” (83).
Also saying “when the populace is hostile regards him with hatred, he must fear evrything and everyone” (86).
Both of these political thinkers have vastly different ideologies, but I wonder if there are any principles that they might agree upon.
Look through both texts and see if you can find any points of intersection. Find quotes from both texts that help to prove that these great advisers do have common ground.
Do they have ideas that do not directly oppose one another?
Are there any ways that their methods of political influence complement each other?
In your conclusion clearly define the sort of commonality you are able to find in these guides to strong leadership.
3 pages
Typed double-spaced
MLA format