Topic Mental Health

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Can you help me understand this English question?

Description, Purpose, and Relevance

Our purpose this semester has been to understand marginality as a real social, economic, and cultural phenomenon within the Appalachian context, and more specifically in relation to Birmingham and UAB. With the synthesis essay, you learned how to establish and join the scholarly conversation on the topic that you have chosen for this semester. Its purpose was mainly to provide an overview of the issues pertaining to your topic. The purpose of this assignment is to engage you in exploring the various arguments that relate to your topic, and then, on the basis of your research, to identify an argumentative position based on the evidence that you have gathered.

With the synthesis essay, you mainly established the context of the topic, without necessarily focusing on UAB, or Birmingham or Appalachia; however, with this assignment, you want to narrow the focus of your topic by identifying a specific issue in a specific context based on what your sources tell you. For instance, if your topic is international students on American college campuses, you will now have to focus more specifically on an issue or a problem that they face due to which they may feel marginalized. The best way to identify these problems/issues is to conduct research. In order to make the argument more specifically about UAB, you will use primary research by interviewing/observing members of the UAB community.

Argumentation is more than just a difference of opinion; it is significant for understanding different perspectives, evaluating the basis for different positions, eliminating fallacies, and arriving at an educated position based on the evidence from research. An academic argument does not just address an academic audience, but also emphasizes the importance of evidence-based approach. In keeping with the AGSC guidelines, the assignment aims at enabling you to develop the skills of critical thinking and argumentation by engaging in primary and secondary research, engage thoroughly in the processes of writing, demonstrate your knowledge of conventions, and most importantly, learn to explore writing as a means of self-discovery and communication. Ultimately, however, the purpose of the assignment is more than just academic exercise; it is an attempt to empower your voices as you learn to take a position on a topic backed by evidence.

Structure

As we learn the basics of argumentation and academic research, we will also learn how we might structure and develop arguments for our audiences. As we will see, there are many ways to invent and structure arguments.

Introduction: Your audience may not know the context of your issue or how the debate has taken place and the different positions on the issue. You will definitely want to set up this context in the introduction of your essay. In addition, you will want to develop your purpose by explaining to your audience how your perspective on the issue connects to or advances their understanding of the issue. Draw from the rich context of your synthesis essay to develop your discussion of these perspectives. Your introduction should demonstrate that you are entering a conversation that includes competing perspectives.

Thesis: At the end of the introduction, you will want to develop an arguable thesis that clearly maps out your focused claim about the issue, supports this claim with reason(s) and evidence. In addition, you will want to lead up to your thesis in a way that shows how your claim connects to the context or ongoing discussion of the issue.

Body Paragraphs: Each of your body paragraphs will need to have a strong Point or Topic Sentence that states the main idea of the paragraph and establishes how this idea supports the thesis. In each body paragraph, your purpose will be to provide a precise Reason that supports your thesis. In addition, you will need to draw heavily on your research for Evidence that support the arguments of your paragraphs. This is crucial to arguing your position successfully. In addition, you will want to develop Explanations/Concluding Ideas that explain your illustrations and also help your paragraphs pass the “So What?” test by pointing to the importance of the information in the paragraph for your thesis.

Body Paragraphs: In addition to the elements above, you will need to develop one or two body paragraphs that anticipate objections from your audience, and provide significant refutations to strengthen your position. This means that you will want to explain to your readers why these counter-arguments do not weaken or disqualify your position, or why they should still accept your argument.

Conclusion: The conclusions to arguments are crucial, as they are often the place where the author spells out the implications of their arguments. This means that the author connects the argument to the real world of the reader, informing them of the applications of the arguments for their own lives or perspectives. While this essay does not require you to recommend solutions or courses of action, you may want to emphasize the need for action.Uses of Evidence
I’m studying and need help with a English question to help me learn.

Chapter 2 of the textbook discusses two scenarios in which evidence may not meet some audience’s expectations. In the first scenario, two scientific studies are in conflict with each other In the second scenario, a child psychiatrist uses stories from his patients rather than statistics as evidence. Each case poses a problem regarding the use of evidence: We sometimes have difficulty reconciling conflicting pieces of evidence, and we are reluctant to see stories, rather than statistics, as valid evidence. In the essay that you are writing right now, what kinds of evidence have you found? In what way might it meet an audience’s expectations? Name the audience, discuss how it may meet–or not meet–the audience’s expectations, and explain why.

Chapter 2 is attached and my essay is also attached for referenceWeek 2 Discussion – (1-2 references): nursing coursework help
I’m studying for my Social Science class and need an explanation.

As you have seen, the definition of terrorism can differ from person to person and from organization to organization. Most definitions have some elements in common.
Who should have the authority to “officially” define terrorism? Why do you think so? What is your definition of a terrorist? Explain your definition. What types of terrorists exist in the world today? List and describe the motivations of today’s major terrorist groups. What can be done to limit the growth of terrorists and terrorism? Describe a plan to limit the growth of terror groups. Are there no alternatives to violence for terrorist groups to make themselves heard?Week 2 Project: (3-5 references): nursing essay help
I need help with a Social Science question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

For this assignment, review the subject of terrorism financing. Read the case of Mohammed and Chawki Hamoud, two brothers who lived in North Carolina and raised millions of dollars for Hezbollah.

Mohamad Youssef Hammoud sentenced to 30 years in terrorism financing case

Prepare a 5- to 7-page report in Microsoft Word that covers the following points.
Describe the mechanics of the Hamoud brothers’ operation. Show specifically how they managed to raise so much money. Identify and explain the specific laws that were broken. Discuss Hezbollah, including their mission and history. What might that group have used the money for? Describe the other ways that Hezbollah receives funding and from whom. Evaluate the efforts being made by counterterrorism authorities to identify and disrupt operations designed to raise money for terror groups.Strayer week 8 case study
I’m working on a Law question and need guidance to help me study.

Case Study 3: Confessions and Admissions after a Request for a Lawyer Due Week 8 and worth 100 points A suspect is apprehended in a department store by the security guard. The suspect is placed in handcuffs and taken to the manager’s office. The police are called and advised of the situation. Officer Martinez arrives at the department store approximately 15 minutes later. Officer Martinez takes a statement from the security guard and views the in-store camera film of the shoplifting incident. Officer Martinez places the suspect under arrest, reads the suspect the Miranda warnings, and asks the suspect if he would like to make a statement. The suspect replies, “No, I would like a lawyer”. The suspect is then transported to the local jail and booked. Six hours later, the suspect is interviewed by a detective who again reads him the Miranda warning. The detective then asks the suspect if he would like to talk. The suspect says, “Yes.” He eventually confesses to the crime.Write a 1- to 2-page paper in which you:
Identify and discuss the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation. Discuss how the Edwards rule is related to this situation. In your opinion, determine if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. Support your opinion with specific case law or contemporary cases. Use at least three quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
This course requires the use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details. Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Research and analyze procedures governing the process of arrest through trial. Critically debate the constitutional safeguards of key amendments with specific attention to the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments. Explain key law enforcement regulatory procedures and rules and requirements of law enforcement in the evidence collection phase. Explain and debate fundamental Supreme Court cases associated with criminal procedure. Use technology and information resources to research issues in the criminal procedure. Write clearly and concisely about the criminal procedure using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 100

Case Study 3: Confessions and Admissions after a Request for a Lawyer

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Identify and discuss the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.

Weight: 35%

Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.

Insufficiently identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.

Partially identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.

Satisfactorily identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.

Thoroughly identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.

2. Discuss how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.

Insufficiently discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.

Partially discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.

Satisfactorily discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.

Thoroughly discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.

3. In your opinion, determine if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. Support your opinion with specific case law or contemporary cases.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. Did not submit or incompletely supported your opinion with specific case law or contemporary cases.

Insufficiently determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. Insufficiently supported your opinion with specific case law or contemporary cases.

Partially determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. Partially supported your opinion with specific case law or contemporary cases.

Satisfactorily determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. Satisfactorily supported your opinion with specific case law or contemporary cases.

Thoroughly determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. Thoroughly supported your opinion with specific case law or contemporary cases.

4. Cite three references.

Weight: 5%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present.

7-8 errors present.

5-6 errors present.

3-4 errors present.

0-2 errors present.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services