LAW220 Entity Formation

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I need help with a Business Law question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Carla plans to open Carla’s Pets Store, a pet sales and pet supplies outlet, and to hire Quimby and Ruth. Carla will invest only her own money. She does not expect to make any profit for at least two years and to make almost no profit for the first three years, but she hopes to expand eventually.

Which form of business organization would be most appropriate?

What are the main characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of this form of business organization?

If Carla wants to obtain additional capital to expand the business, but does not want to lose control of the company, what is her best option?

Your paper should be 500-750 words, with at least two cited external sources.Week 2 | Researching Rhetorically Post #2: Informative (Project 1): nursing essay help
I’m stuck on a English question and need an explanation.

Now that you’ve found an opinion/persuasive piece related to or about the movement you are interested in, you will focus on finding another text that is in conversation with that first text.

STEP 1: Choose an informational text that is relevant to/about your movement or organization and in conversation with your first text. Examples of informational sources include a news article (not an opinion piece), an informational webpage, or an informational book. It’s important that you try to find a source that is not expressing an opinion, but is informing the audience. (Note: if you choose to pick a news article, make sure that the words “Op-Ed, Opinion, Editorial, Letter to the Editor” are not on the page, as that indicates an opinion piece.)

Importantly, try to pick a source that isn’t just very broadly about the same general topic as the one you used for the last discussion, but one that provides information about the same question or concern that your previous source debated. For example, if my first source was about March for Our Lives and how they are increasing youth activism, my second source might be about March for Our Lives and youth activism, too. (Remember, you cannot use March for Our Lives for this project.)

NOTE: Try to find a source with information that surprises you or enhances your understanding of the conversation in some way. This will facilitate your analysis. (In other words, if the source provides only information you already knew from reading the text that you wrote about in Post 1, it may affect the quality of your response.)

STEP 2: Once you’ve identified an article to work with, read the article/text and then write a rhetorical summary, at least 250 words long. To help you write a rhetorical summary, see Guiding Questions for Rhetorical Summaries below.

NOTE: there is one new question to answer that was not included in the previous assignment. Make sure you answer this new question.

Guiding Questions For Researching Rhetorically:

Please use specific examples from the text to support your analysis. Here are some questions to consider.
First, identify the author (first name and last name) and title of the piece and where/when it was published. Then identify the core idea of the author’s argument, along with information on what they’re arguing and how they’re making their argument. (If it’s an informative piece, identify what the main goal of the document is and what they are using to support that goal. For example, what are they trying to explain? Why? How?) Your summary should remain an objective report of the article/text, without your commentary or opinion of the author’s argument/information. Who is the audience for the text and what was the author’s purpose? Remember that the audience cannot be “everyone”. (For example, does the audience belong to a particular age group? To a specific geographical location? A political affiliation? A specific career or degree of knowledge? Look for clues in the text.) What is the writer responding to? What do you know about the author/place of publication? How does the writer use evidence/information? Is the evidence/information reliable? Why or why not? What is the level of bias or degree of advocacy in the medium where this article was published? For example, a newspaper or website might believe something very strongly, to the point that they are very selective in the information they share, or they might be trying to be “neutral”. If you look into the newspaper/website/etc, you might get clues. What might you say are the medium’s values? For example, for an article, you might read the Wikipedia page to learn more about the magazine or newspaper in which it is published. For a social media post, you might click on the profile and see if the other posts indicate a bias. For a website, you might look at the “about page” or read other perspectives on this website. Try to understand if this author is advocating a specific position (or is “neutral”) and/or if the place where this source was published advocates a position (or is “neutral”). Look at the WAY the author makes the argument. What stylistic choices does the author make? What content choices? What choices regarding images, layout, etc? How do such choices relate to their rhetorical purpose/s? For example, how do their choices help develop their ethos? How do the choices support their argument? How do their choices help them connect with the audience? What do these choices have to do with the place where the text is published? How does the genre of the text affect these choices? What did you learn from this source that you did not know from the previous sources? In what ways does this source build on or contradict the other sources? How is the source entering the conversation with your previous sources? In what ways are they entering the conversation in similar or different ways from your previous sources?
Grading Criteria for this Post:

Here is a link to example posts by a student in a former class. In the margins, the instructor points out what the post does well. Notice how the student meets the following criteria, by which you will be graded for this post:
Responds in detail to the specific prompt, including choosing an appropriate text to discuss Show in-depth engagement with text(s) related to a specific conversation, including thoroughly addressing the provided guiding questions Make specific references to the text(s) for support The writing is organized and polished showing evidence of audience consideration, and an effective proofreading and editing process.
Rubric

Researching Rhetorically Posts Rubric (1) (1)

Researching Rhetorically Posts Rubric (1) (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponds in detail to the specific prompt, including choosing an appropriate text to discuss
3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeShow in-depth engagement with text(s) related to a specific conversation, including thoroughly addressing the provided guiding questions
5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMake specific references to the text(s) for support
4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe writing is organized and polished showing evidence of audience consideration, and an effective proofreading and editing process.
3.0 pts

Total Points: 15.0

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services