Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
I’m trying to learn for my English class and I’m stuck. Can you help?
The Importance of Paraphrasing
There are essentially two ways in which writers reference the ideas of others in their essays: paraphrase and direct quotation. You may already know this, but to paraphrase means to translate someone else’s ideas into your own words. Thus, with a paraphrase, you are still citing someone else’s ideas in your writing, and this is a critical aspect of academic writing.
The benefit of paraphrasing is that you keep control over the writing in your essay. Now, I’m not a control freak or anything, but remember that your essay is just that—your essay. Not Derrida’s or anyone else’s. Those people, most likely, have published many things before. This is your chance to share your opinion and develop your critical perspective.
And even if you’re not entirely interested in developing a critical perspective, paraphrasing helps you maintain the focus of your essay. By definition, paraphrasing involves shortening—cutting words that are not relevant to your point at hand. That is a powerful thing as a writer. You are still citing the ideas of someone else, but there is editorial judgement involved, because you must make decisions about what must stay and what can go. Paraphrasing is an important tool for academic writers because it allows you to get rid of the ideas not immediately relevant to your point at hand, but keep the ideas that are. This editorial judgement, however, should be done in an ethical way, meaning that you accurately present the original writer’s ideas and do not make them sound different than they actually are.
The following text summarizes the key points in the chapter so far, and offers guidelines that can help you decide when to directly quote and when to paraphrase a source text.
Quotation vs. Paraphrase
If someone’s ideas but not his/her exact words are important to your point, you should paraphrase rather than quote. A paraphrase should not change the ideas but it can eliminate or change words, often in order to condense a long sentence that contains details unnecessary to your point.
Quotation: In the short story “Thanks for the Ride,” Arnold Friend threatens Connie, the protagonist, by saying: “You come out here like a nice lady and give me your hand, and nobody else gets hurt, I mean your nice bald-headed daddy and your mummy and your sister in her high heels” (3).
Paraphrase: In the short story “Thanks for the Ride,” Arnold Friend warns Connie, the protagonist, that he will hurt her mother, father and sister if she doesn’t do what he wants.
Guidelines for selecting a quotation:
Before you decide to use a quotation, ask yourself this question: Why am I using this passage? If you answer one of the following statements in the affirmative, you should use a direct quotation, not a paraphrase:
I am quoting this passage because the author’s words are so impressive or so clever that to put them in my own words would lessen their impact. I am quoting this passage because the author’s words are so precise that to put them in my own words would change their meaning. I am quoting this passage because the author’s words are so concise that I would need twice as many words to paraphrase this passage.
If you answer “No” to those questions, you should paraphrase.
Now that you understand the distinction between summaries, quotations, and paraphrases, you are well on your way to writing from readings, or writing academically. The important idea from this section to remember is that academic writing does not happen in a vacuum or on an island (to mix metaphors). It is always in response to some kind of text or idea. Thus, it is critical that academic writers (i.e. students, YOU) cite those ideas in their own writing, using direct quotations and paraphrases, and then respond to those ideas. This process is known as an “academic conversation.”
Answer the Questions:
What are at least three takeaways you want to remember for when we start writing essays? Do you have any further questions about the materials?Assessment
I don’t know how to handle this Business question and need guidance.
I had a group assessment and a presentation on ADP Company. I received feedbacks from my coaches and evaluators. I am attaching the grading rubrics that I got from them. Based on that you have to write a paper.
Paper Requirements:
Using the feedback provided in residency, reflect on
Section 1: Review feedback from assessors
Section 2: Self-assess using the same rubrics
Section 3: Compare and contrast
Section 4: Develop a plan for your personal development
It should be 2 pages, single space. And follow the instruction.1200 word Summary: nursing coursework help
I’m studying and need help with a Political Science question to help me learn.
Minimum 1200 words • 20 points • Give your paper a title
This homework is a three-part assignment. It requires you to think and reflect. It asks for your position on several prominent political players. Having now seen two films on two US wars: “Fair Game” (Iraq) and “The Most Dangerous Man in America” (Vietnam), both of which featured whistleblowers at the highest levels, fully address the following three sections:
I – First: give a summary of each film. These are separate entries. Do not mix these. Fully summarize ‘Fair Game,’ then fully summarize ‘The Most Dangerous Man in America.’
II – Second: answer the following terms.
What is social justice? (Do not give me a dictionary definition, give me YOUR considered definition.)
What is a patriot? (Do not give me a dictionary definition, give me YOUR considered definition. Avoid such things as ‘a person who supports his/her country’ – what is the meaning here??)
What is a traitor? (Do not give me a dictionary definition, give me YOUR considered definition.)
The terms above were used by many of the people who were interviewed in the films. Opinions here varied widely. Make the definitions your own.
III – Third: comparing the list of names below to the definitions you’ve given above, categorize the listed individuals as patriots or traitors to the United States (some of them might fall into more than one category). Indicate whether or not any of them contributed to social justice as you have defined it and explain why or why not. There is no right or wrong answer. You can despise or love some or all of them – but you need to JUSTIFY your position on each of them.
Daniel Ellsberg Richard Nixon George Bush Dick Cheney Joe Wilson Scooter LibbyWriting to Inform: my visit to Mammoth Lakes, Ca: nursing case study help
I need help with a English question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.
Subject: My Visit to Mammoth Lakes, C
The primary purpose of a profile is to inform readers about a living person, a place visited, or an event attended. For this assignment, choose a place that you have visited. For example, your profile might describe a local business, restaurant, or landmark; your backyard garden; a foreign country; a recent duty station; a specific airport, train, or bus terminal, your child’s classroom, a museum, a sports arena, or field, etc.
To potentially receive full credit, you should:
Write a profile essay of 400 – 450 words in which you describe your selected place. Reminder: an essay should contain an introduction, body, and conclusion. Include a thesis statement at the end of the introduction that focuses on some aspect of the place that the reader will find intriguing or unusual. Rely on showing via sensory impressions (sights, sounds, tastes, smells, and tactile sensations) rather than telling. Hint: use action verbs (i.e., explode, roared, bloomed, ran, etc.) rather than passive verbs of being (i.e., is, was, were, are, etc.) Bring attention to the uniqueness of the place, showing what is remarkable about it. Present a portrait of the place through a specific angle of vision. That is, convey a dominant attitude toward the subject, an attitude (i.e., fascination, disgust, amusement, detachment, joy, etc.) that can be implied through details or stated explicitly. . You must also double-space your assignment.If you use your own experiences as support for your thesis, this is fine—and you may use first-person words (I, me, my, mine). This tone is appropriate since you do not want to refer to yourself in the third person.Journal writing
I don’t understand this English question and need help to study.
Instructions:
To begin this assignment, compose your Journal 2 answering the following prompt:
Jena McGregor, in her essay, “Military Women in Combat: Why Making It Official Matters (Links to an external site.),“ offers the readers insights into the promotion process in the military. She also argues that it is unfair as it stands, women are stopped from advancing. She gives her rationale for change and also her opponents’ (the opposition’s) reasons for supporting this stance. Based on that somewhat vague summary (I deliberately made it vague so that you would have to read it!), I have a question that I would like you to answer:
What do you think? Is McGregor or the other side correct? Do both sides have good points? If you ran the country, how would you handle this issue?
In the Journal, give the author’s full name and “Essay Title.”
Write your answer in a short paragraph (150-200 words).
