Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
I don’t understand this English question and need help to study.
thoroughly and thoughtfully in order to earn the full 20 points. The discussion post should be at least 300 words; if you need to, type your response out on a Word doc, then copy and paste your response into the discussion forum. Each response should be at least two-three sentences long.
After having read “Digital Natives, Yet Strangers to the Web” by Alia Wong, answer the following questions in detail:
What is Wong’s overall argument?
What are you being asked to believe, think, or do? Provide a quote that leads you to believe that is her argument.
After reading her entire article, what part was the most convincing?
Why? Provide a quote.
On the contrary, after reading Wong’s article, which part was the most confusing or least convincing?’
Why? Provide a quote.
Lastly, based on your understanding of audience (as we briefly discussed in class on Tuesday), who do you believe Wong is trying to persuade?
Who is likely reading an article about technology in education?
Format of Assignment: All writing assignments should be consistently formatted for MLA 8th ed. I ask for Times New Roman 12pt font with 1” margins all-around. You do not need to do an APA style cover page. Instead, please include your name, my name, course number and the date the assignment is due in a double-spaced heading in the upper lefthand corner. Your paragraphs will also be double-spaced. Please number your pages, beginning with the first page, in the upper right-hand corner. Please include appropriate titles. See sample below. Doe 1 Jane Doe Instructor Blaine Malcolm RWS 100 8 September 2018 Digital Death: A Rhetorical Analysis of Video Game Violence Juan Bartlett’s “Video Game Violence Law Poses Questions” is an editorial published in the online magazine V Planet. Bartlett, a video game artist, argues
I uploaded the article belowDiscussion: my nursing assignment help
I’m stuck on a Political Science question and need an explanation.
“Which of the main historical themes of American strategy, and which aspects of the American way of war, predispose the United States to choose the role of “global policeman?” Which serve more to restrain US strategy”?
Discussion guidelines and requirements, please see the syllabus as necessary.
This discussion is from chapter two of our class text book, per the syllabus.
Chapter Two [ America’s Security Strategy ]
on page 30 of the class textbook, question 6 is the exact topic of this discussion item you are to write a one full page ( about 250 words) paper on question six and only question six first copy the question from the class text then respond to the question
you must provide and least three citations
one from the class text book two from other sources follow the source and sourcing document carefully you can argue your points however you want but you must follow this protocol now – reread this whole thing again, for understanding and clarity500-800 word essay
Can you help me understand this History question?
Assignment 1: Different Approaches to Diversity Issues (1865–1925)
History 105:Due Week 3 and worth 120 points(Dr. Stansbury)
Submission deadline:9am Eastern time; Monday morning, January 27
In Assignment 1, we ask you to choose one of three topic choices listed below on the subject of diversity then use the Writing Guide located in Blackboard to write a brief paper on the subject. Each topic explores two different approaches to diversity during the 60-year period after the Civil War (1865–1925). The dynamic between the two approaches will have a profound impact on our history then—and now.
As you prepare and brainstorm ideas for your paper, first read and review what our Schultz textbook covers on the subject. Then, consider the other sources listed with each topic below. It is important that you review these sources carefully because your paper should use a minimum of three sources from the list below. Besides this instruction sheet and the Writing Guide, be sure to review the other helps (documents or video) provided by your instructor.For information on the SWS format, see the “Strayer Writing Standards” tab on the course menu, usually at the lower left of your Blackboard course shell.The SOURCES AND TIPS sheet posted will be especially helpful for properly citing your sources in the paper—make use of it.
TOPIC CHOICE ONE: Empowering African Americans—Two Strategies
Here you will focus on the approaches of Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois. Other noted names and certainly different organizations will become part of your inquiry. Washington’s famous 1895 “Atlanta Compromise” speech (labeled such later by critics) sets the tone. One might find virtues, problems and successes associated with both strategies. You might see elements of each in strategies of later leaders and related issues even today.
Sources: Schultz, p. 340–2, 400–1, 404–5. See http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/39/; and see http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/40
TOPIC CHOICE TWO: Getting Women the Vote—Two Strategies
Here you will focus on the approaches of two organizations and some names associated with each. These are the NAWSA (National American Woman Suffrage Association; later the League of Women Voters) and the NWP (National Women’s Party). You will identify the strategic approach and key players in each as they pursued the common goal of getting women the right to vote. One might find virtues, problems and successes associated with both strategies. You might see elements of each in strategies of later leaders and related issues even today.
Sources: Schultz, p. 364–366. Also see https://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/biographies/carrie-chapman-catt on one of the leaders of the NAWSA; on the NWP’s Alice Paul, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GDe4DkZN2A ; and https://americanhistory.si.edu/blog/2012/05/alice-paul-champion-of-woman-suffrage.html.
[Topic Choice Three on next page]
p.2
TOPIC CHOICE THREE: Immigration—Two Opposing Approaches and Views
Here you will focus on two opposing views of immigration and its impact on American culture and life. These are visible in the late 1800s and early 1900s, in a time when immigration was skyrocketing for a long period; but significant restrictions would come into play. One view is represented by lines of a famous poem on the base of the Statue of Liberty. The other view finds its place in laws restricting immigration. One might find virtues, problems and successes associated with one or both strategies. You might see elements of each in strategies of later leaders and related issues even today.
Sources: Schultz, p. 334–5, 348–9, 358–9, 408–9. Look for events and issues like the opening of Ellis Island, the melting pot idea, the Chinese Exclusion Act, and the National Origins Act.Also see the poem on the Statue of Liberty base: https://www.nps.gov/stli/learn/historyculture/colossus.htm . And see http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_9781133309888/unprotected/ps/chinese_exclusion_act.htm .
————————–
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Use the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other formats like APA. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
Be typed, double spaced between lines, using Times New Roman font, Calibri, Arial, or Courier (size 10, 11, or 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and sources must follow SWS format. You must have a Sources list at the end; each source listed must also be cited in the body of the paper with an in-text citation. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. The preferred file software is Microsoft Word (part of MS-Office).Alternatively, a student can use Windows’ WordPad (not NotePad) or OpenOffice.(Please do not submit files in .pdf format or Apple’s Pages or Google Docs.) Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date you submit. The cover page and the Sources page are not included in the required assignment length.
The body of the paper should be five paragraphs and a total of 500-to-800 words in length.The 500 minimum is firm; you really have not adequately developed the paper if less than that. The 800 maximum is a loose guideline.The body of the paper is to be double-spaced.Typically, if you follow these instructions, the body of your paper will be 2-1/2 to 3-1/2 pages in length; add a page for your title page and another for your sources list and that then gets to 4-1/2-to 5/1/2. But, the length requirement is evaluated by word count.
The paper must be submitted (uploaded and attached) in the course shell provided online.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Discuss the developments, racial and political policies, and laws from 1865 to the 1920s following the end of slavery.
————————————————————————–
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. [grading rubric is on the next 2 pages below]
p. 3
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. [rubric is on p. 3-4 here]
Points: 120
Assignment 1: Different Approaches to Diversity Issues (1865-1925)
Criteria
Exemplary
100% A
Proficient
85% B
Fair
75% C
Meets Minimum Expectations
65% D
Unacceptable
0% F
1. Introduction: Identify the two different approaches that you will discuss. Describe what you will cover in the paper.
Weight: 10%
Thoroughly and clearly introduced your paper byidentifying the two different approaches that you will discuss and describing what you will cover in the paper.
Satisfactorily introduced your paper byidentifying the two different approaches that you will discuss and describing what you will cover in the paper.
Partially introduced your paper byidentifying the two different approaches that you will discuss and describing what you will cover in the paper.
Insufficiently introduced your paper byidentifying the two different approaches that you will discuss and describing what you will cover in the paper
Poor or no introduction. Did not identify the two different approaches that you will discuss. Did not describe what you will cover in the paper.
2. History and Issues:Describe the development of the approaches, any key people or events, and any “success.”
Weight: 30%
Thoroughly and coherently described the development of the approaches, any key people or events, and any “success.”
Satisfactorily described the development of the approaches, any key people or events, and any “success.”
Partially described the development of the approaches, any key people or events, and any “success.”
Insufficiently described the development of the approaches, any key people or events, and any “success.”
Did not submit or incompletely described the development of the approaches, any key people or events, and any “success.”
3. Comparison:evaluate what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each view, and the impact of each in that period of history.
Weight: 15%
Thoroughly and clearly evaluated what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each view, and the impact of each in that period of history.Used persuasive reasoning or clear examples.
Satisfactorily evaluated what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each view, and the impact of each in that period of history.
Partially evaluated what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each view, and the impact of each in that period of history.
Insufficiently evaluated what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each view, and the impact of each in that period of history.
Did not submit or incompletely evaluated what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each view, and the impact of each in that period of history.
4. Conclusion: identify similar issues or approaches that developed later, and any similar issues today.
Weight: 15%
Thoroughly and effectively identified similar issues or approaches that developed later, and any similar issues today.
Satisfactorily identified similar issues or approaches that developed later, and any similar issues today.
Partially identified similar issues or approaches that developed later, and any similar issues today.
Insufficiently identified similar issues or approaches that developed later, and any similar issues today.
Did not submit or incompletely identified similar issues or approaches that developed later, and any similar issues today.
5. Used the MINIMUM of three sources, drawing from the list provided. The class text is one of the sources used. Sources are listed at the end and matching in-text citations are used.
Weight: 10%
Meets at least the minimum number of required sources; all sources high quality choices. Sources are listed at the end and also cited in the body of the paper. Solid research is evident.
Meets minimum number of required sources; most sources come from the list provided.
Does not meet the required number of sources; some sources poor quality choices or not from the list provided.
Does not meet the required number of sources; Insufficient on the reference list or in-text citations.
No sources provided.
6. Writing and Presentation:
Used good grammar. Presentation shows clarity, reason, and critical thinking with proper writing mechanics. SWS format is used for reference entries, in-text citations, paper layout, and organization. Instructions followed.
Weight: 20%
0–2 errors.
3–4 errors.
5–6 errors.
7–8 errors.
More than 8 errors present.
————————————————Article Review
I need help with a History question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.
Should be in strict Chicago style. The articles to be worked on are attached below.
You will write a 500-700 word analysis of ONE of the following scholarly articles.
*brief introduction to the article.Imagine a person who has not read the article and, in a couple of sentences, tell us what period/country/people/events the article discusses.
*summary of the thesis (argument, point) put forward by the author
*why is the author writing this article?How does it contribute to the larger conversation among historians about this topic?
*summary of the structure of the author’s argument.What are the parts of the article and how do they work together to build up the author’s thesis.
*an analysis of the sources of the article.What kinds of primary sources does the author use (legal documents, memoirs, newspaper articles, letters, petitions, police reports etc).How does the type of source shape the content of the article? [hint – the author may discuss his/her sources, but check the footnotes too]
*how well do you think the author argues his/her thesis?What are the strengths and weaknesses of the article?
Evaluation
I will be assessing how well you address the questions listed above, and the clarity of the organization of your ideas and of your writing.Do not use quotations to speak for you – use your own words.Be specific – use direct examples (and sometimes quotations, if helpful) from the article to illustrate and back up your points.Cite the article as the source for these examples, using the Chicago style.DO NOT use other sources.Harriet Robinson, “Early Factory Labor in New England”: assignment help philadelphia
I’m working on a History exercise and need support.
Two Page double spaced
Harriet Robinson, “Early Factory Labor in New England”
In 1883, Harriet Robinson described her work in the textile mills between 1832 and 1845. A portion of her memoir was assigned for this week’s readings and excerpts from this document can be found below (following all of the questions). Write an analysis of her memoir based on these excerpts that responds to the following questions:
Part I:
What are two ways that the market revolution affected women’s lives in the United States? In what ways did women’s lives improve during this time period? In what ways might their lives have become worse? What can we learn from the memoir about workers’ rights – what experiences did Robinson have that promoted the organization of workers for better wages and working conditions? The primary sources assigned for this week and discussed in class also included “An Account at Lowell.” Why might Robinson’s memoir be considered a more trustworthy source than “An Account of Lowell? What does Robinson’s memoir tell about the time period that “An Account of Lowell” does not? Are there any limitations to using the memoir as a primary source for understanding the market revolution?
Part II: Discussion Question – please add this below your essay (not as part of it). You can put it on the same page as your essay, but in a separate section.
Please pose one discussion question about this reading. What do you think is important to talk about with regard to this source? What is a question that you could ask to deepen your understanding by relating it to other readings, class themes, or issues in American history?
Responses will be graded according to the following criteria:
Does the response address all the questions posed? Does the response demonstrate that the student has done a close and careful analysis? Does the response offer a thoughtful engagement with the source? Does the response demonstrate a concerted effort to think about the significance of the source and its relationship to course topics? Does the response make sense? Are the ideas within it clearly communicated? Is the response written in essay form, with a thesis, a set of paragraphs that each address a distinct argument in support of the thesis, and a conclusion
Excerpts from document:
…I shall confine myself to a description of factory life in Lowell, Massachusetts, from 1832 to 1845 …
In 1832, …Help was in great demand and stories were told all over the country of the new factory place, and the high wages that were offered [and] gave new life to lonely and dependent women in distant towns and farmhouses…Troops of young girls came from different parts of New England and from Canada…The early mill girls were of different ages. Some were not over ten years of age; a few were in middle life, but the majority were between the ages of sixteen and twenty-five.
The working hours … extended from five o’clock in the morning until seven in the evening, with one half hour each, for breakfast and dinner…Those of the mill girls who had homes generally worked from eight to ten months in the year; the rest of time was spent with parents or friends. A few taught school during the summer months. Their life in the factory was made pleasant to them. In those days there was no need of advocating the proper relationship between employer and employed. Help was too valuable to be ill-treated.
…To make a gentleman of a brother or a son, to give him a college education, was the dominant thought…I have known more than one to give every cent of her wages… to her brother, that he might get the education necessary to enter some profession. I have known a mother to work years in this way for her boy…There are many men now living who were helped to an education by the wages of the early mill girls…
… As late as 1840, there were only seven vocations outside the home into which the women of New England had entered. At this time, women had no property rights. A widow could be left without her share of her husband’s (or the family) property…A father could make his will without a reference to his daughter’s share of the inheritance…A woman was not supposed to be capable of spending her own, or of using other people’s money.
…One of the first strikes that ever took place in this country was in Lowell in 1836. When it was announced that the wages were to be cut…The mills were shut down and the girls went… and listened to incendiary speeches from some early labor reformers. One of the girls stood on a pump…declaring that it was their duty to resist all attempts at cutting down the wages. This was the first time a woman had spoken in public in Lowell, and the event caused surprise and consternation among her audience…
…the strike did no good. The corporations would not come to terms. The girls were soon tired of holding out, and they went back to their work at the reduced rate of wages.