Powers Of European Union

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m trying to study for my Political Science course and I need some help to understand this question.

One of the biggest concerns expressed by the British citizens is the powerful status of the European Union. According to the British government, there is a need to reduce the powers of the European Union. The suggestion made by the British government is as follows: national parliaments in the various European countries must be given the power to veto the laws of the European Union. Therefore, if European Union passes a law on a specific matter, the law would not apply to countries that veto such a law. Critics of this proposal argue that doing this will make the EU irrelevant. Defenders of the proposal argue that this would protect the sovereignty of each European country. Do you agree with the UK or you believe that EU should have enough powers to be and efficient organizationWriting Assignment
I’m working on a exercise and need support.

Length: Essays should be NO MORE than 1,500 words, including footnotes and excluding bibliography. Format: Double spacing, Times New Roman (or some other sensible font), size 12. Submission: Submit, as a Word or pdf document, through the link called “Writing Assignment I” on Canvas. For EXTREMELY good advice on writing a philosophical essay see: http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/guidelines/writin… Choose one of the following questions:

1. Given what we know about the nature of self-control, to what extent, if any, are addicts morally responsible? (Module 4)

2. Critically asses the argument that we don’t have free will based on Libet’s experimental results. (Module 5)

3. To what extent, if any, are psychopaths morally responsible? (Module 5)

4. Critically asses the traditional theory of self-deception or the deflationary theory of self-deception. (Module 6)

5. To what extent, if any, does neuroscientific knowledge support either moral revisionism or moral eliminativism? (Module 7)

6. Choose some other topic from Modules 4-7. (If you choose this option I recommend, but do not require, that you run your topic by me.) Note: The topics above are quite broad.

You are both allowed and encouraged to focus more narrowly. Part of the challenge of this assignment involves setting yourself a narrow and well-defined task that you can accomplish in the allotted word limit (don’t bite off more than you can chew). Some advice: Make an outline with a clear structure. Focus on 2 clearly setting up the issue, making sure to define key terms and concepts. Be sure to be charitable to the authors that you discuss (that is, give their views the most plausible, as opposed to the least plausible, interpretation). Strive for clarity (read the Jim Pryor stuff above!). My favorite advice from the Pryor article is to write while imagining that your reader is lazy, stupid, and mean: “He’s lazy in that he doesn’t want to figure out what your convoluted sentences are supposed to mean, and he doesn’t want to figure out what your argument is, if it’s not already obvious. He’s stupid, so you have to explain everything you say to him in simple, bite-sized pieces. And he’s mean, so he’s not going to read your paper charitably. (For example, if something you say admits of more than one interpretation, he’s going to assume you meant the less plausible thing.)” Now, of course, those reading your paper will be none of these things! But if you write with this idea in mind, it will help you achieve a high level of clarity and precision, which is highly valued in philosophical writing. I still try to keep these things in mindessay (350-400 words): online nursing assignment help
I’m working on a Geography question and need guidance to help me study.

Find at least five (5) articles from popular media sources (newspapers, magazines, blogs, etc.) related to the Downtown and the West End (choose one of, for example, tourism, davie village, public space, planning issues, retailing, etc.). Read the articles and, in a paragraph or two, offer your comments one the issues/themes that emerge, the stakeholders, the consequences, or any thing else that you think is important. Remember these assignments are supposed to help you build an experience of Vancouver (Canada). It is, therefore, important that you: a) explore the these issues on your own, and b) reflect on the material you find. Please review the material on reflection and how it might be graded if necessar.

350-400 wordsEthics and Professional Skepticism: my nursing assignment help
I don’t understand this question and need help to study.

OPTION #1: ETHICS & PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM
In 2005, Jill Smith was an audit senior working for a public accounting firm on the audit engagement of the ABC company. One of Jill’s friends asked her whether she thought that ABC stock was a good investment. She said yes.

Her friend offered to purchase ABC stock on her behalf. Jill provided $5000 for the purchase placed under her friend’s name. She didn’t want her name associated with it because of independence concerns; an auditor is not allowed to own stock in a company that they audit.

Auditors that own stock in companies they audit as considered part owners, and therefore not independent. This may infer with an unbiased audit because they may make decisions in the best interest of the client instead of external users. Even if they do conduct an unbiased audit, if they are stock holders, they may not be perceived as unbiased.

Jill continued working on the ABC company account into 2006, and she failed to comply with the firm’s independence policies by lying on the yearly disclaimer. The public accounting firm launched an internal investigation into the matter based on an anonymous tip and terminated her employment. The PCAOB barred her from serving as an external auditor for a period of at least one year.
What are the unethical actions of the auditor, Jill Smith? Discuss what her decisions in this case cost her? Was it worth it? What are some of the current rules in relation to the independence of an auditor? In this case, compare independence in fact versus independence in appearance. Do you think that Jill’s punishment was appropriate? Explain your answer.
Your written response paper should be 3-4 pages in length. Please type your assignment up in a Word document and follow APA format, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Include a title page and reference page. Use two (2) outside academic sources other than the textbook, course materials, or additional information provided as part of the course materials.

doneseen

Same reference requirementGB Communication
I’m studying for my class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

ALL PARTS HAVE TO BE COMPLETED

Part 1 300-500 words

We come upon interpersonal communication situations every day whether we realize it or not. No doubt, you have had conversations that did not go the way you wanted them to go. People can often see things differently; the same message can be understood in many different ways.

Discuss one situation that didn’t go as you had expected and consider why.

Your discussion should include the following:
Summarize the situation:
Who were you talking to? What was the subject? How did it go?
Explain the following:
How did the rules of conversation (ethics, listening effectively, patience, and non-verbal considerations) apply in this conversation? How did opinions, both your own and the individual’s that you were speaking with, influence the direction of the discussion?
Part 2 300-500 words

One of the most important ways to understand people is to get a sense of their self-concept. Self-concept refers to how people see themselves; it is a combination of self-awareness and self-esteem. Self-concept often will dictate how an individual interpersonally communicates.

Consider the following scenario:

You are advising new students here at CTU. Your goal is to have your students be self-confident and well-adjusted. To help encourage the development of these qualities, you decide that you are going to create a one-page resource that provides an overview of self-concept. Within this discussion, please provide information on the key points that you would discuss within this resource.
Summarize the situation:
What is self-concept? Name all parts. What are some of the dangers of negative self-concept? What are some benefits of positive self-concept?
Explain the following:
How can someone improve his/her self-concept?
Part 3 300-500 words

An underrated aspect of interpersonal communication is listening. Many times, the success of a conversation will depend on whether one person took the time to actually listen to what the other person had to say.

Think about a time in which you had a conversation with someone and although you heard the words that the person spoke, you did not really listen. Did you ever wonder why? Take the time to describe the incident and then discuss the following:
Summarize the situation:
Who were you talking to? What was the subject? How did it go?
Explain the following:
What is the difference between hearing someone and listening to someone? Which style of listening was used in this example and why? What are some of the barriers to effective listening in your example?
Part 4 300-500 words

With any personal relationship, there is the potential for conflict. Whether it is in the workplace or in a person’s home life, conflict often occurs. In fact, it should be seen as natural and unavoidable in some respects.

Because this is the case, think about a time in which you had a conflict with someone and reflect on the following:
Summarize the situation:
What was the cause of the conflict? Was it one of the fundamental causes that often lead to conflict? How did you handle it?
Explain the following:
Was it the best way to handle it, or are there techniques that you should have used instead? Which technique that you have learned might have been helpful in this situation? Why? Use sources.
Part 5 300-500 words

For this assignment, you will read a scenario and use of the interpersonal skills you learned in the course to resolve the conflict and repair the relationships.

Consider the following scenario:

You have just been transferred to a new department at your place of employment. Your first task in this new department is to take a lead project management role on a project that has been taking longer than the company had anticipated.

You decide that a great way to get to know the team is to have a lunch meeting in a private room at a local restaurant. You want to have a nice lunch and an informal conversation about the project to get a feel for why the project seems sluggish. At the restaurant, people introduce themselves and you note the following:
Marisa focuses on training and development. She seems confident and driven. She has a rich background in training and development. Joe is the subject matter expert on the new product. He is confident in his knowledge of the product. He is a perfectionist. Christopher is the information technology and programming expert. He is quiet and reserved. You are unsure about his country of origin, but it is clear that English is a second language for him. You have heard that he is very good at what he does.
During lunch, you noticed the following:
Marisa blames Joe for the project’s lack of success. She says he takes too long to get her the information she needs. Marisa’s role is to create the training plan for selling the new product. She needs Christopher to finish his work before she can begin training employees. Joe is defensive and yells at Marisa. He tells her he is not putting his name on the product until it is ready. He also tells Marisa that she is not smart enough to understand the product, so he has to dumb it down for her. When Christopher tries to offer his understanding of the situation, Marisa tells him that his job is simply to create what she tells him to create; then continues to argue with Joe. Christopher looks down at the table and stops talking. Things are really starting to get heated and it is clear that this informal lunch meeting is quickly getting out of hand.
The description of this scenario can be downloaded here for future reference: Unit 5 Discussion Board Scenario.
Summarize the situation:
Write up a plan for resolving the conflict, getting the project back on track, and repairing the relationships of each individual involved. Explain how interpersonal communication skills can be used to resolve the conflict between the teammates.
How would you address the situation with each of the three individuals in a respectful manner? How do you take what they have said and done into consideration?
Explain the following:
Where are patterns of conflict that are occurring with each individual? How can these relationships be repaired using concepts of interpersonal communication such as power, listening skills, asking questions, cultural and personal sensitivity, empowerment, reframing, and any other conflict resolution strategies you find appropriate?

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services