Writing Assignment

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Help me study for my Psychology class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

Sorry for short notice, but I totally forgot about this assignment and I need it done within the next 5 hours.

Our social psychology chapter touches on topics that are vitally important to each of us in our personal lives, and to our functioning as members of the many groups we use to define ourselves. There is little more pervasive and important in individual human functioning – and happiness – than our relationships. And on a broader scale we see everywhere how our divides confront us, whether by gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, politics, sports team… the list goes on.

I’ve chosen chapter subtopic that to my mind cuts to the core: Understanding Others. It all starts here. There are two related subtopics: stereotyping and attributions.

Here is a brief overview; details follow. In this assignment you will explain and then apply to an example of your choosing the concept of attribution and the “fundamental attribution error” (a.k.a. “correspondence bias” – a more opaque term). The application exercise will draw from your own experience; this is an exercise we will repeat over the semester. Then you will examine what makes this error more likely.

This assignment taps the following learning objectives as outlined in the syllabus:
Ethical and Social Responsibility Foundational Knowledge Application to the Real World Ethical and Social Responsibility in a DiverseWorld
INSTRUCTIONS

ATTRIBUTIONS AND RELATED ERRORS
Use this header to title this section: Attributions and Related Errors. In the first paragraph in this section, subtitled “Definitions“:
Define in your own words “Attributions” and the “Fundamental Attribution Error” (including dispositional and situational attributions).
In the second paragraph in this section, subtitled “Application“:
Provide your own example illustrating this attribution error as applied (as it usually is) to another person (not to the self).
Your example may be personal, but it needn’t be. There’s plenty in the public sphere to draw from. Choose an example that demonstrates an important failure to understand another.
In the third (and, as needed, a fourth) paragraph in this section, subtitled “Reasons for the Error”
Explore reasons this error may have occurred.
Consider the covariation model and apply as it fits. Consider other personal factors that may have led to the error.
For example: could physical or emotional state have contributed? Beliefs, attitudes, history? Something else? How? Note that our text doesn’t go into this much. Free-ranging speculation is encouraged.
In a final paragraph or two, subtitled “Why this Matters”
Make a case for why this topic matters for practical and ethical human functioning. Consider:
Interpersonal functioning – the individual level. Illustrate with specific detail. The broader social sphere – how we interact with “out-group” members (by race, ethnicity, religion gender, etc.)
Rubric is attached:Intelligence failures: nursing case study help
I’m studying for my Political Science class and need an explanation.

For this assignment, instead of looking at an intelligence problem, you will look at an intelligence failure. To get started, check out the Foreign Policy article linked below. The article highlights 10 of the biggest intelligence failures in US history. You are to select one of those failures as the subject of your paper. You may choose a failure not on the list, but if you do, you must get your topic approved by me. Please note, that your topic does not have to focus on US intelligence, it can look at the failure of another country’s intelligence agencies. Also note, that this is not intended to be a critique of any presidential administration past or present. Instead this is an analysis of the analytical pitfalls that led to the intelligence failure. This paper should include the following elements:
Title page Introduction with strong thesis statement Background and analysis of the intelligence failure Assessment of which analytical techniques learned in this class could have prevented the failure (you may discuss more than one) Conclusion Bibliography
Friedman, Uri. (2012). “The Ten Biggest American Intelligence Failures.” Foreign Policy, (Jan 3) https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/01/03/the-ten-biggest-american-intelligence-failures/

General Requirements

1. Document Format:

a. MS Word document

b. One-inch (1”) margins

c. Times New Roman font

d. Twelve (12) pitch

e. Double spaced

f. This assignment should be 6-8 pages. This does not include your cover page and bibliography.

g. No pictures

2. Citation Format: The Chicago Manual of Style (CMS). As stated in the Academic Integrity Briefings, information taken directly from another source must be placed in quotations and cited following the CMS format contained in the week one “lessons” folder. You must cite all other information from your sources, even if you do not quote directly. DIRECT QUOTING SHOULD BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM.

3. Grading is based on the assignment rubric.

4. You must use 5 scholarly sources in completing this assignment. If you are unsure what scholarly means, please check out the APUS Library’s definition here.Discussions response
I’m studying for my Psychology class and need an explanation.

Response Guidelines

Respond to the post of one of your peers. Include relevant, required information; adequate explanations; and alternative viewpoints. Offer additional resources that may help expand their perspective, divergent issues for consideration, and suggestions for enhancing their discussion. Your responses to your peers should contain at least 250 words as well as two scholarly resources. Keep in mind the academic honesty policy and academic integrity policy stressing respectful discussion.

Tarell Williams

Sexual problems are not specific for eating disorders. The etiology is complex and no one single causal factor has been identified. However, clinical as well as epidemiological studies have shown that eating disorders occur more commonly in females than males. The evidence that eating disorders are more common in females over males has resulted in the consideration that socio-cultural factors may be important. Through this insight, gender role is being considered as a contributing factor. This information is vital when dealing when the sub population of gender nonconforming adolescents with ED and gender dysphoria. Clinical experience and research have shown the important role of sexual problems and traumas in the development of anorexia nervosa and bulimia in females over males. The purpose of the article’s case studies hinges around expanding their interdisciplinary discussion regarding the breadth of presentation and management considerations for gender nonconforming adolescents with disordered eating. An interdisciplinary approach to care might enhance access to comprehensive, collaborative treatment for disordered eating, and gender dysphoria in this unique population.

Prior studies suggest that treating gender dysphoria might lead to a decrease in associated ED behaviors in this population (Donaldson, Hall, Neukirch, Kasper, Simones, Gagnon, & Forcier, 2018).However, gaps remain in our understanding of the varied presentations of gender nonconforming adolescents with ED, potential risk/protective factors, comorbid characteristics, and best approaches to care. The purpose of the article was to identify emerging themes across disciplines in a series of five gender nonconforming adolescents with ED in hopes of advancing the understanding of this high‐risk group to better screen as well as identify and collaboratively manage similar young people at every available point of care.

The cases of ED in gender nonconforming adolescents imply that medical and psychiatric factors play dominant roles in dealing with ED as well as notable common features. Common features include an increased risk for self‐harm/suicide, complex psychiatric and medical implications of delay to treatment, the importance of partnership with interdisciplinary providers/patients/families to maximize care and facilitate healthy development. With the five cases, the architect used specific examples to expand understanding of how interdisciplinary teams might best approach care for this complex, emerging population. Finding imply that in the absence of timely and available gender dysphoria management,gender nonconforming youth may turn to maladaptive behaviors to change their bodies, or self‐harm the body that they perceive as a betrayal of their authentic gender.

Suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and SIB are not uncommon among gender nonconforming or ED populations (Hollis, 2017). Even as gender nonconforming adolescents progress through gender‐affirming interventions, many will experience stigmatization that ignores, invalidates, or dismisses their identity, thereby contributing to the development/exacerbation of psychiatric comorbidities population (Donaldson, Hall, Neukirch, Kasper, Simones, Gagnon, & Forcier, 2018).

Partnering with an interdisciplinary team helps better articulate an appropriate treatment plan, including identification of a goal weight range and nutritional plan. Dietitians and medical providers must therefore be particularly collaborative in establishing weight/nutritional goals. Because adolescents’ longitudinal nutrition goals vary for a number of reasons, dietitians and medical providers must therefore be particularly collaborative in establishing weight/nutritional goals. In addition, providers might need to take creative approaches to treatment planning in this population; for example, consulting growth curves for both the patient’s natal and asserted gender to establish appropriate goal weight parameters.

This study highlights the inadequacies in ED treatments in addressing issues related to gender amongst diverse gender populations. It illuminates how identity is negotiated in the context of the lived experience of an ED is embodied. The study also provides evidence that gender plays a significant role in this embodiment. Therefore, the conscious or inadvertent ignoring or marginalizing of questions and issues related to gender in ED treatments has and will continue to have inevitable implications for the processes and extent by which people engage in ED treatments. Greater consideration and inclusion of gendered perspectives in ED identification and the transformation of ED treatments holds scope for more significant and meaningful positive outcomes for those with lived experience.Select a select a website for a product, service, or organization connected to your field
I’m stuck on a English question and need an explanation.

Select a select a website for a product, service, or organization connected to your field, your projected profession or your personal interests and write a thesis-driven evaluative argument in which you examine the rhetorical strategies of the site.For example, if you travel, you might choose a budget vacation finder like Expedia (www.expedia.com) or Gate1 Travel (www.gate1travel.com). More locally focused interests might include the online presence of a Texas-based glossy magazine like Texas Monthly (www.texasmonthly.com), a local coffee roastery (https://xelaroasters.com) or a brewery (www.saintarnold.com or https://www.karbachbrewing.com/). You can also focus on a service like meal prep, car buying, or a delivery service. A charity might also be something you want to examine for this essay as well.Each of these websites is making an argument: “(You should) buy this” or “(You should)trust us” or “(You should) join us.” The purpose of this essay is to evaluate how effectively your site persuades viewers to “do this” or “do that” by analyzing and evaluating the rhetorical elements in the site.The paper must be 3 to 5 pages, double-spaced, font size 12, standard 1” margins and follow MLA format conventions. You must include the url of the website used. A successful essay will:• Bring readers into the context of the website, briefly summarize the website’s content, and make a claim (thesis) for the site’s rhetorical effectiveness or for the most significant rhetorical features of the site. A strong claim is both contestable – reasonablepeople might disagree – and predictive – it will set up expectations for the direction of your essay.• Develop your main points around specific criteria for evaluating the site. Consider how the site makes its argument, not whether or not you agree with the content. Analysis and evaluation rely on your objective judgments. Remember also that rhetoric encompasses any tools available for persuasion. Talk about the argument in terms of ethos, logos, pathos. Remember to state the criteria you’re using to evaluate the site. Observe and analyze the impact of the design and images used. Consider who might be the target audience.• Support your main points with concrete examples (evidence) from the website. To develop and support your own points, you will need to include visual features and details (color, design, and images) as well as short quotations from the site. You must include 2+ images and 2+ quotes pulled from your site to illustrate and support your argument. Think of your own ethos and logRace and ethnicity are terms that are commonly confused in everyday life. Furthermore, the concepts of racism, stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination are often topics of discussion without much thought as to their precise meaning. First, discuss in yo: nursing essay help
Help me study for my Sociology class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

You are required to first post a response to the discussion board prompt and it must be a minimum of 250 words. Citations, titles, copying questions, references, and other identifying information does not count toward word count. You are required to use proper grammar and spelling. When using other sources, citations using APA style are required. Direct quotes are not permitted in discussion posting, therefore you must paraphrase and cite. In addition, you must post a discussion response to a student’s discussion posting. When responding to a classmate to a classmate, your response needs to be pertinent and of substance. Stating that you agree or disagree is not sufficient. You must substantiate your responses. Above all, they must be respectful and worthy of intellectual honesty, sincerity, and humility. Responses must be a minimum of 250 words as well.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services