Gun Right

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m trying to learn for my English class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

I have upload a description of the assignment ) the topic is about gun right

and here is the first link https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.c…

can you please find more sources as it mentioned in the file attached .

Paper Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Requirements• Meets all req. of assignment • Follows format specifications (MLA/APA) with few to no errors
10.0 pts

Excellent/Always
9.0 pts

Consistently/ Very Good
8.0 pts

Good/ Mostly
7.0 pts

Sufficiently/ Adequate
6.0 pts

Limited/ Occasionally
1.0 pts

Lacking 1-5 points
0.0 pts

Missing

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis/Controlling Purpose• Lays out a clear, specific, arguable claim that governs the paper • Thesis is nuanced, complex, original
10.0 pts

Excellent/Always
9.0 pts

Consistently/ Very Good
8.0 pts

Good/ Mostly
7.0 pts

Sufficiently/ Adequate
6.0 pts

Limited/ Occasionally
1.0 pts

Lacking 1-5 points
0.0 pts

Missing

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Discussion• Facilitates reader’s understanding of complex ideas • Flows without interruption • Clarity contributes to ease of comprehension
10.0 pts

Excellent/ Always
9.0 pts

Consistently/ Very Good
8.0 pts

Good/ Mostly
7.0 pts

Sufficiently/ Adequate
6.0 pts

Limited/ Occasionally
1.0 pts

Lacking 1-5 points
0.0 pts

Missing

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence & Analysis• Employed when warranted by paper’s claims • Uses most persuasive type of evidence • Analysis of evidence moves the argument forward
10.0 pts

Excellent/ Always
9.0 pts

Consistently/ Very Good
8.0 pts

Good/ Mostly
7.0 pts

Sufficiently/ Adequate
6.0 pts

Limited/ Occasionally
1.0 pts

Lacking 1-5 points
0.0 pts

Missing

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Sources• Makes use of summary, paraphrase, and direct quotations, as needed • Incorporates sources without error • Uses signal phrases and discusses quotes’ significance • In-text references and Works Cited/References page correctly cite all sources
10.0 pts

Excellent/ Always
9.0 pts

Consistently/ Very Good
8.0 pts

Good/ Mostly
7.0 pts

Sufficiently/ Adequate
6.0 pts

Limited/ Occasionally
1.0 pts

Lacking 1-5 points
0.0 pts

Missing

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization• Paragraphs well constructed (one topic, claim sentences) • Suits paper’s needs • Transitions function as signposts
10.0 pts

Excellent/ Always
9.0 pts

Consistently/ Very Good
8.0 pts

Good/ Mostly
7.0 pts

Sufficiently/ Adequate
6.0 pts

Limited/ Occasionally
1.0 pts

Lacking 1-5 points
0.0 pts

Missing

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudience Analysis• Understands readers’ needs • Controls tone • Provides context • Addresses counterarguments
10.0 pts

Excellent/ Always
9.0 pts

Consistently/ Very Good
8.0 pts

Good/ Mostly
7.0 pts

Sufficiently/ Adequate
6.0 pts

Limited/ Occasionally
1.0 pts

Lacking 1-5 points
0.0 pts

Missing

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle• Sentences clear • Diction well chosen • No wordiness • Writing style improves the ideas of the paper
10.0 pts

Excellent/ Always
9.0 pts

Consistently/ Very Good
8.0 pts

Good/ Mostly
7.0 pts

Sufficiently/ Adequate
6.0 pts

Limited/ Occasionally
1.0 pts

Lacking 1-5 points
0.0 pts

Missing

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, Punctuation• Clearly edited and proofread • Contains few or no errors
10.0 pts

Excellent/ Always
9.0 pts

Consistently/ Very Good
8.0 pts

Good/ Mostly
7.0 pts

Sufficiently/ Adequate
6.0 pts

Limited/ Occasionally
1.0 pts

Lacking 1-5 points
0.0 pts

Missing

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Quality of Argument/Discussion• Paper is insightful, engaging, complex, relevant • Paper goes beyond class discussion in an intellectually daring way, surprising the reader
10.0 pts

Excellent/ Always
9.0 pts

Consistently/ Very Good
8.0 pts

Good/ Mostly
7.0 pts

Sufficiently/ Adequate
6.0 pts

Limited/ Occasionally
1.0 pts

Lacking 1-5 points
0.0 pts

Missing

10.0 ptseng315 powerpoint: nursing essay help
I need help with a English question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Develop a PowerPoint presentation (12-18 slides in length). It should include a title slide, an agenda slide, body content slides, a closing slide, and a references slide (if applicable). All slides count toward the required length.

The content should focus on some aspect of social media use in the workplace. Potential examples include the importance of companies embracing social media, advertising through social media, policies involving social media, proper professional communication through social media platforms, or any number of other angles.the giver book
I’m stuck on a Philosophy question and need an explanation.

Giver Paper (4 pages minimum, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman 12-point font)

Write an essay connecting class materials/discussion to Lois Lowry’s The Giver, reflecting on the questions in both A and B:

A. How does Jonas come to an understanding of himself? What role does memory play in this understanding?

B. Does Jonas make the right ethical decision in leaving his community? How does the relationship he has with his community play a role in his coming to that decision?

The essay should relate observations regarding these questions to content from the course texts and discussions. Be sure that the introduction of your paper includes your thesis about each question, and that the body of your paper presents logically constructed arguments to support your theses. Papers should include reference to events, characters, plot/subplots and themes in the novel relevant to your argument, but must not retell the story.

No outside research is required or expected on this assignment, but a close and thoughtful reading of the novel and its relationship to course topics is necessary. Use of any outside materials in your paper should nonetheless use proper citation. (See the Catalog statement on “Plagiarism” in “Class Policies” in syllabus.) Connecting class discussions and other readings will strengthen the essay and is essential for a B-level grade or above on this assignment (see assignment rubric below).

Rubric

PL 104 Giver Paper Rubric (1)

PL 104 Giver Paper Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompletion on time
10.0 pts

BASIC/PROFICIENT/EXCELLENT: 20 Completed on time.
6.0 pts

MINIMAL: 6-9 Not sufficiently completed and/or not completed on time.
0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT: 0-… Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics: clarity, grammar, attention to Style Sheet as appropriate etc.
10.0 pts

EXCELLENT: 9-10 Written with exceptional clarity and argumentation, persuasive style that describes well the observations about the book.
8.0 pts

PROFICIENT: 8 Organized, clear, and succinct. No grammar, syntax or spelling errors. Paper shows both distinctions and the relationships among its various parts/sections.
7.0 pts

BASIC: 7 Follows Style Sheet guidelines. Meets but does not exceed length requirement. Well organized. Generally free of grammar, syntax or spelling errors. Parts of paper are clearly delineated.
6.0 pts

MINIMAL: 6 Fails to follow Style Sheet guidelines. Disorganized, unclear, substantial grammar, syntax and spelling errors. Parts of paper not clearly delineated.
0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT: 0-… Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion A: Jonas’ self-understanding, and role of memory
40.0 pts

EXCELLENT: 37-40 Demonstrates thoughtful analysis and makes nuanced philosophical connections with course content.
35.0 pts

PROFICIENT: 34-36 Gives clear evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; clear connection with course content
32.0 pts

BASIC: 32-33 Gives some evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; minimal connection with course content.
28.0 pts

MINIMAL: 28-31 Lacks evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; no connection with course content.
0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT: 0-… Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion B: Jonas’ decision, and role of community
40.0 pts

EXCELLENT: 37-40 Demonstrates thoughtful analysis and makes nuanced philosophical connections with course content.
35.0 pts

PROFICIENT: 34-36 Gives clear evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; clear connection with course content
32.0 pts

BASIC: 32-33 Gives some evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; minimal connection with course content.
28.0 pts

MINIMAL: 28-31 Lacks evidence of student’s having reflected on the question; no connection with course content.
0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT: 0-… Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

40.0 ptsaddress a different family issue and a policy or set of policies that attempt to address that issue
I’m trying to learn for my Social Science class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

At least 2 pages plus APA reference page. 12 font, times new roman, 1 in margins, double space, section headings. Topic can be postpartum, gun laws, self esteem, dating violence, see something say something, university mental health

I uploaded all the requirements and a previous paper to show my writing style (which is obviously not great) and my second paper so if you could find a happy medium that would be great!GED 120- Intro to Humanities essays: nursing assignment help
I need help with a Philosophy question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Hello, I am requesting assistance with writing four (4) essays that are 400-500 words each, APA Style with atleast one reference. Below you will see the essay choices under each unit. Any other questions I can answer or the following are instructions. Thanks.

Writing Assignments

Each unit examination includes a written component. The writing assignments give students the opportunity to demonstrate a level of subject mastery beyond the objective unit examinations, which re ects his/her ability to analyze, synthesize, evaluate and apply his/ her knowledge.

Writing assignments are judged on the quality of the response. Word count is NOT one of the criteria that is used in assigning points to writing assignments. However, students who are successful in earning the maximum number of points tend to submit writing assignments that are 400-500 words (1-2 pages) per question.

Plagiarism

All work must be free of any form of plagiarism. Put written answers into your own words. Do not simply cut and paste your answers from the Internet and do not copy your answers from the textbook.

Plagiarism consists of taking and using the ideas, writings or inventions of another, without giving credit to that person and presenting it as one’s own. This is an offense that the university takes very seriously. An example of a correctly prepared written response may be found by visiting the Coast Connection student portal. You can nd this in the portal by clicking on Student Resources and thenWriting Basics.

Citation Styles

The majority of your response should be your own original writing based on what you have learned from the textbook. However, students may also use outside materials if applicable. Be sure to provide a citation and a reference for any materials used, including the required textbook. The following points are designed to help you understand how to provide proper citations and references for your work:

•Sources are listed in two places.

The first, a citation, is briefly listed within your answer. This includes identifying information that directs the reader to your list of references at the end of your writing assignment.

The second, a reference, is at the end of your work in the list of references section.

All sources cited should follow APA style and provide enough identifying information so that the reader can access the original material.

Please utilize/reference the following textbook:

The Humanities Through the Arts

Lee A. Jacobus & F. David Martin, 2018

McGraw-Hill Education

ISBN.13: 978-1-260-15418-4

GED120 – INTRODUCTION TO HUMANITIES

UNIT #1

You only need to select one question from the list below:
Using your experience in perceiving either Blume’s “The Eternal City” (Figure1-3) or David Alfaro Siqueiros’s “Echo of a Scream” (Figure 1-2), discuss how education and experience changed your perception of the art. Were your values identified at all? If so, how? Do you agree with the authors’ assertion that participation is the most fundamental of the basic distinctions of art? Why? If you disagree, which do you think is the most important and why? Do you have any experiences with art to draw on to support your claims? Select one of the following paintings and describe its organization in terms of the principles of composition including balance, gradation, movement and rhythm, proportion, unity, and variety: Fragonard, The Swing, 1776 (Figure 4-13) Monet, Impression, Sunrise, 1873 (Figure 4-15) O’Keeffe’s Rust Red Hills, 1930 (Figure 4-12)
UNIT #2

You only need to select one question from the list below:
Compare Michelangelo’s “David” (Figure 5-8) with Rodin’s “Danaïde” (Figure 5-9). How does each sculptor establish the gender of his figure? Does Rodin achieve more in terms of gender identity by leaving some of the original marble unfinished? Analyze the “spatial” and “revelatory” functions of Frank Lloyd Wright’s Guggenheim Museum. Give specific details and incorporate relevant terminology. Compare and contrast Old Comedy and New Comedy. Describe characteristics of each. Give examples.
UNIT #3

You only need to select one question from the list below:
Using Beethoven’s “Eroica”, discuss, in detail, the difference between “hearing” and “listening to” music. What specific factors go into “listening”? Explain, in detail, what makes Alfred Stieglitz’s “Paula” a pictorialist photograph. Be sure to use examples to further your discussion. Explain the significance of understanding the context in which a film exists. How does contextual knowledge influence our participative experience with film? Give examples to illustrate your point.
UNIT #4

You only need to select one question from the list below:
Explain the origins of Dadaism. What did it aim to achieve? What distinctions are made between Dadaism and Duchampism? Why are these “isms” categorized as idea art? Why is Frank Gehry’s Nederlanden Building in Prague (Figure 15-8) considered an “extraordinary interaction between the arts”? What art form does the work of architecture interpret? Which elements does it appropriate? Explain. Explain the relational theory of value and how it has informed our study of the humanities during this course. Give examples to support your explanation.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services