Week 2 Discussion Question

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I need support with this Law question so I can learn better.

This week’s reading takes you from the general discussion we held last week into some more specific details about the role of both criminal justice and non-criminal justice professionals in the IT and computer forensics world, as well as why it is important that you understand the basic principles and concepts of the criminal justice process. Make sure to post early and review the new due dates. Then we get into the meat of what you would do and how you would interface with law enforcement in the event you have to conduct a forensic system analysis. The readings in module 2 again stress the importance of understanding the criminal justice process, as well as discuss different types of devices or file systems that may contain information critical to your analysis.

Among the basic concepts to understand this week are that there are many types of evidence one could find in digital data. Understanding what data you may find, even if it is not evidence of a crime, is important to preparing a digital examination/analysis plan. Let’s look at a non-technical example…

When a law enforcement officer applies for a warrant to search a residence, the officer must specify for what it is he or she is searching; if the case involves a stolen car, then the officer’s search will be limited to only those locations a stolen car, or pieces of a stolen car (in case it was chopped), could be located. It would be unwise to just list the stolen car on the warrant, as (in the interpretation of the court) might only limit the officer to the whole car, intact. So, the officer has to determine in the beginning of their search what could have happened to the car (attempting to account for all the possibilities) so his or her search is complete (and most likely to yield results). The officer will also have to justify (in the affidavit) why he or she believes that the car could be found in smaller pieces.

To that end, an officer with auto theft experience may also be able to state that, in his or her experience, stolen cars are often broken down into smaller components, which can be identified with certainty as belonging to the original stolen car, as well as where such components could be hidden. It would most likely not be enough for the officer to simply assert that cars are broken down and sold for parts, if he or she wants to justify seizing an ashtray; the ashtray would need some specific characteristics to do that like a serial number, or other unique identifying artifact.

Search warrants and searches are, therefore, most often limited in scope to items for which the searcher is looking (i.e., nearly always evidence of a crime or wrongdoing). You cannot look for an elephant in a kitchen drawer! I know that sounds absurd, but it is an excellent metaphor… However, if you were looking for narcotics, they could be hidden almost anywhere, and you could justify a much broader search. In this example, digital evidence is much more akin to narcotics than you may think, with evidential data often occurring in hidden, strange, or unlikely places. As such, warrants to search for digital evidence often cast a “wide net,” but cannot be so overly broad as to not be supported by probable cause or violate someone’s Fourth Amendment protections and implied rights to privacy under the Constitution.

Do not despair, however, if you are not a law enforcement officer… The requirement to obtain a search warrant does not apply to searches by private individuals or non-government organizations, as long as the individual(s) have the authority to conduct the search (e.g., IT security personnel are searching a computer owned by their company for company data, or an employee gives the company consent to search for their personal data). Judicially, the Court evaluates whether your activity was an extension of the government (law-enforcement); acting on their behalf or assisting them. However, even those searches may be limited to certain parts of the computer system(s) or network(s). If a person is allowed to use a personally-owned flash drive at work, and that drive is connected to the computer, you still may not be able to search it without the employee’s consent. All of these examples depend heavily on established company policies and what warnings were given to the employee.

The readings this week identify several types of devices on which digital evidence could be found.

For this week’s discussion, please select two of the devices described in your readings (or other devices, if you prefer). For each device, answer the following questions below in detail. Please discuss thoroughly and substantively in your post. Additionally, Ensure you CITE your SOURCES in APA format
For each, state what types of evidence you would look for on those devices in detail Explain what limitations or hurdles you would have to clear before searching each of the devices (BOTH as a company IT professional and a law enforcement officer). Identify what, if any, policies would need to be in place for you to search as a private employee, as well as what limits can be placed on the search by police.Leadership Styles
I’m working on a Business exercise and need support.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word summary in which you articulate elements of leadership using the following criteria:
Examine your individual, essential elements of leadership and management. Differentiate between leadership and management roles, and provide specific examples from the text, literature, or personal example.
Cite at least one peer-reviewed source in addition to the course text (be certain to include the web link for your test in your citations).

******NOTE: Here is the web link I took my test on to put in the citations: http://www.yourleadershiplegacy.com/assessment/assessment.php

here are my test results, I don’t think you need it but just in case:

Your assessment results show that you have the characteristics of these types of leaders:

• Ambassador – your score is 14 points out of 25• Advocate – your score is 7 out of 25• People Mover – your score is 12 out of 25• Truth-Seeker – your score 16 out of 25• Creative builder – your score is 13 out of 25• Experienced guide – your score is 16 out of 25

*****Please make sure there is no plagiarism and that majority of the paper is in your own words and not all from the web. The professor will be checking to see how much is web based and in your own words.******it’s essay has two parts – reading: assignment help philadelphia
Help me study for my English class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

assignment has two parts – reading the text and identifying the main argument and persuasive strategies and then writing an essay in response. Choose one of the following

write a multi-paragraph essay which integrates your analysis of BOTH texts, and in which you write a reasoned position comparing and contrasting the strategies each writer uses to appeal to its intended audience.

After you have read both articles, write a multi-paragraph essay in which you analyze ONE of the texts. In your analysis take a reasoned position on the extent to which the text is rhetorically effective given its intended audience.what alternative therapies are available for veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder: nursing case study help
I don’t understand this Social Science question and need help to study.

Instructions: Work through each step of this log, answering each question as the directions indicate. Each step, except Step 1, will receive a grade, and the sum of these grades will constitute your total grade for Research Log Part 1. Refer to the section on how each step of the log will be graded for detailed grading information.

Most fields require text entry. If a required field is left blank, your work will not be submitted. If you would like to leave a field blank, simply type N/A.

Review your work before submitting it to your instructor for grading; you will be unable to edit it further after submitting it.

Note: Be sure to review the examples and hints provided with each step! Your answers should be similar to the examples.Economics Discussion
I’m trying to learn for my Economics class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

In this module/week’s forum, you must read one of the articles above or listen to one of the podcasts and provide a summary of the article or podcast in the opening paragraph. In your second paragraph, you must explain an economic idea contained in this story. This should relate to something from the text book reading. Specifically, note how the economic idea plays a prominent role in the story. In the third paragraph, you must explain what you think about the events in the story. You do not have to agree with what is going on, but you do need to provide your reaction to it. This is your chance to express yourself: what are your opinions? Be sure to defend your position. Finally, what do you think is a Christian response to this situation? Provide details to support your view (in other words, do not just say “Christians wouldn’t act the same way as economists”).

Topics:
Why cut tuition if students keep coming?: University of San Diego says they will try to slow tuition increases Getting back on your feet gets harder with minimum wage hike:Felony Franks Restaurant Closes Tax that wicked sugar: Mexico’s Sugar Tax Leads to Fall in Consumption for Second Year Running PODCAST: What should the government do? Lighthouses, autopsies and the federal budget Another rate hike in the future? Netflix mulls raising prices again

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services