Checkpoint 3 – Topic Proposal

Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

I’m working on a English exercise and need support.

Write a brief topic proposal for your research paper. What is your opinion on your topic? Why are you personally interested in it? Read the handouts on ethos, pathos, and logos and the “So What” question–explain how these concepts will help you as your develop your argument in your papers. Finally, choose one on-line source that you think will be useful to your topic. How does that source utilize ethos, pathos, and/or logos? Your analytical checkpoint should be 250-500 words long.

1.How to Conduct Research.docx

2. Evaluating Sources with Ethos Pathos and Logos.docx

The So What Question.docxApplication Assignment- Anthropology
I’m working on a Social Science question and need guidance to help me study.

The instructions and required materials are below. The link is to a podcast that is required to answer the questions if you prefer to read I have also attached a transcription of that podcast.

https://samharris.org/podcasts/the-biology-of-good-and-evil/

You are only required to listen to the fist 30 minutes of this podcast. I encourage you, however, to listen to all of it if you can. Once again – only the first 30 minutes is required.

This is a relatively difficult listen, mostly due to the topics discussed and the fact that it would be helpful to have some basic knowledge of biology, discussions of free will, and neurology in order to better understand it. However, we have covered a lot of this in class and besides, it’s good to take on academic challenges. As always, please come to me for help if you need it.

EACH ANSWER REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 5 SENTENCES!

And follows same rubric as first podcast assignment.

( Starts withing the first 5 minutes) – Describe what Robert Sapolsky studies. He has two fairly distinct fields of study – how does he “marry” them? ( Starts within 10 min) – Why does he study baboons and not, say, chimpanzees, given that the latter are more related to us? He mentions both practical reasons and reasons specific to his research interests. (10-15 minutes mark) – When asked, “how/why did behavior X occur?” -Dr Sapolsky frames his answer in a certain way. Summarize it. Why is this important to frame it this way – when discussing human behavior? Why is it important to study related non-human primates when studying or trying to explain our own behavior? What are some issues about using non-human primate behavior when trying to explain humans behavior? (At about 17:00 and the rest of the assigned listening time(they allude to this earlier though))- they start talking about “free will and human behavior” Summarize their discussion on this. (At 25:00 through the end of the assigned listening time) – What are your thoughts on free will, especially in relation to human behavior and evolution?3-2 Final Project Milestone One: Draft of Judicial Systems: nursing assignment help services
I need help with a Law question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Instructions

For Milestone One, submit a draft of the Judicial Systems section of your final project, the scenario analysis. Using your assigned readings and course materials, as well as the provided scenario for your final project, you will analyze the structure of the courts and the application of principles of jurisdiction and venue.Philosophy Ethics Argumentative essay: nursing homework help
Help me study for my English class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

In writing this essay, you must respond to the topic question (which I am going to prove below) with a clearly stated thesis, which you defend with arguments based on the ethical theories discussed in class. This paper must be 1200 words minimum about 5 pages ‘wish,’ double spaced. Your essay should contain at least three outside sources that are properly cited in MLA style. (By ‘outside source’, I mean some book or article other than the Sandel text or our readings from class.) Plagiarized papers will receive a zero.

1. Immunizations:

Should parents be forced to have their children immunized? Argue for or against this issue. The following links contain important information about the ethics of immunization; however, please consider other sources, as well. (If you decide to use a source below make sure to at least find two other academic scholarly source, books, journals, etc).

http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2472&context=facpub (Links to an external site.)

http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2006/10/pfor1-0610.html (Links to an external site.)

http://www.everydayhealth.com/columns/health-answers/why-unethical-opt-out-measles-vaccination-your-child/ (Links to an external site.)

https://www.brandeis.edu/ethics/ethicalinquiry/2011/January.html (Links to an external site.)

http://www.kpbs.org/news/2010/may/04/ethics-vaccines-and-public-health/ (Links to an external site.)Juxtaposing Ethical Behaviors
I’m studying and need help with a Law question to help me learn.

The purpose of this assignment is to examine two juxtaposing ethical behaviors that occur in the criminal justice and security professions. For example, investigating officers are not only allowed, but are even encouraged, to lie and use deception during an investigation or interrogation process as a means of obtaining the truth and ultimately justice. This is an ends-justify-the-means, borderline ethical practice that shows the pragmatic difference between deontological and ontological ethics.

Write a 275- to 350-word analysis of deception in the investigative and interrogative processes. Consider the following questions:
Is it ethical to lie to obtain to the truth? Do the ends justify the means? Is there a conflict between the code of ethics and how law enforcement is actually conducted?

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services