Speach By Patrick Henry “Freedom Or Death”

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m working on a Communications exercise and need support.

Begin your analysis of the speech and it’s arguments. In your essay, be sure to identify and explain the rhetorical strategies that the speaker used. You might consider:
Why did they choose these strategies? Where the rhetorical strategies successful? What was the goal of the speech, and was that goal achieved? Does the speech still hold meaning today? Is it meaningful as a historical relic or is it still inspiring? What was the speaker up against?
Be sure to focus on the rhetorical elements of your speech. You will need to include history from the time period, and potentially biographical information about your speaker. But the majority of your paper should focus on the speech and it’s effectiveness. Be sure to include academic sources for your speech. You must have 3 academic sources. Be sure to include a works cited page listing your academic sources, the speech that you have chosen to analyze, and any secondary or mass media sources.

This 10 page, 12pt. font, double spaced report will include your analysis of the selected speech. In your analysis you will use the terms defined and explored in this class. You will provide historic context and background for the speech.Email after the interview
I don’t know how to handle this English question and need guidance.

PROMPT:

Imagine you just submitted all of your documents and completed the first round of interviews. It is the following day. Your task? Send an e-mail to thank the interviewer!

Practically speaking, this means to treat this discussion post like an e-mail:

– Subject line should be the subject of the e-mail!– Body of the e-mail should greet the interviewer (invent a name!) and appropriately (without being too wordy) thank them for their time– Closing should be professional and warm

Unlike your last email, this will not require an extra paragraph. Just write the e-mail and show me that you know how to express thanks concisely and professionally!

Note: NO PLAGIARISM

The company is McCarthy and I should applied for a construction engineering internship!Case Study 1: Understanding Process Measurement Variation: assignment help philadelphia
I need an explanation for this Statistics question to help me study.

Case Study 1: Understanding Process Measurement Variation

For this assignment, you will need to conduct an experiment then create visuals that will be placed within a PowerPoint presentation to present your findings. Your presentation should be easy to read and have a consistent design theme throughout. Please view the first four chapters in the following Lynda.com course on PowerPoint Essentials before creating your presentation.

PowerPoint2019 Essentials Training

Read the following experimental variation scenario:

To help you learn about measurement variation, try this experiential learning exercise. (We are indebted to Alan Goodman, DuPont Company, Wilmington, Delaware, for bringing this exercise to our attention.)

You have started a new business providing height measurements of humans. Your customers expect accurate and precise measurements. You offer two methods of measurement: (1) a yardstick or a meter stick, and (2) a tape measure. You need to test the two methods to evaluate their performance and provide the results to your customers.

For this experiment you will need the following tools:
A yardstick or meter stick A tape measurer Access to an entrance door that is 6 feet or taller A group of 20 or more people (they do not have to be gathered at the same time, but it should be 20 different people that participate).
You will test Method 1 in this way: Identify a group of 20 or more people. You will ask the group of 20 or more people to measure the height of the entrance door that is approximately 6 feet or taller. Be sure that the entrance door is the same for each member of the group. Each person will measure the height of the door using the yardstick or the meterstick and will silently report the measurement to you or to someone you have designated as the data collector. You will then tabulate the data and plot each measurement on a run or sequence chart. No deviation from the prescribed method is allowed.

In method 2, you may use the same, or a different, group of 20 or more people and the same or a different entrance door. This time, the group will use the tape measure in any way the group members desire. Again, each person silently reports the measurement of the entrance door to you or a designated data collector, and you will tabulate and plot each data point.

You will then create a PowerPoint presentation that includes each of the following items:
Compare the accuracy and precision of the two methods using graphical and analytical methods. Which method was more accurate? Develop a flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Develop the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods. This can also be done in the flow chart. (Please reference these instructions on how to create a flow chart in Microsoft Word.)
Analyze the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Next, categorize whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Provide a rationale for your response. Which method of measurement would you recommend? Why? Should different methods be used under different circumstances? Consider the role of different customer segments.
Discuss the feelings the group(s) had when using the two methods. What were the differences between the two sets of feelings? Are these differences important?
Use research.strayer.edu to identify at least two (2) quality references to support your discussion.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
A PPT presentation with at least 8 slides that include the responses to numbers 1 through 3 above. A references slide which follows APA format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Formatting of the slides should be consistent and easy to read. Cover slide containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.
Note: The cover and the reference slides are not included in the required assignment slides length.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Design strategies to enhance organizational performance that are informed by the principals of statistical thinking.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric:

Points: 180

Case Study 1: Understanding Process Measurement Variation

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Compare the accuracy and precision of the two methods using graphical and analytical methods. Develop a flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Develop the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods.

Weight: 20%

Did not develop or incompletely developed the flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Did not develop or incompletely developed the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods.

Partially developed the flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Partially developed the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods.

Satisfactorily developed the flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Satisfactorily developed the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods.

Thoroughly developed the flow chart for each method in which you specify the key problems that might be present. Thoroughly developed the supplier, input, process steps, output, and customer (SIPOC) model to analyze the process of both methods.

2. Analyze the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Next, categorize whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely analyze the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Did not submit or incompletely categorize whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially analyzed the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Partially categorized whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily analyzed the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Satisfactorily categorized whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly analyzed the flow chart and SIPOC model to identify opportunity for improvement (OFI). Thoroughly categorized whether the OFI are caused by special causes or common causes variations. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

3. Discuss the feelings of the two groups about the two methods. Discuss the differences between the two sets of feelings. Are these differences important? Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not discuss or incompletely discussed the feelings of the two groups about the two methods. Did not discuss or incompletely discussed the differences between the two sets of feelings. Did not provide an answer or incompletely provided an answer to the question: Are these differences important? Did not provide or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially discussed the feelings of the two groups about the two methods. Partially discussed the differences between the two sets of feelings. Partially provided an answer to the question: Are these differences important? Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily discussed the feelings of the two groups about the two methods. Satisfactorily discussed the differences between the two sets of feelings. Satisfactorily provided an answer to the question: Are these differences important? Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response

Thoroughly discussed the feelings of the two groups about the two methods. Thoroughly discussed the differences between the two sets of feelings. Thoroughly provided an answer to the question: Are these differences important? Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response

4. Select the method that was the most accurate. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not select or incompletely selected the method that was the most accurate. Did not provide or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially selected the method that was the most accurate. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily selected the method that was the most accurate. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly selected the method that was the most accurate. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

5. Integration of two (2) references

Weight: 5%

No references provided and Sources are rarely integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, or lack in-text citations.

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices and/or sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, along with in-text citations.

References are mostly relevant sources of fair quality and are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, along with in-text citations.

References are highly relevant, high quality sources and are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, along with in-text citations.

6. Presentation Requirements

Weight: 5%

Presentation does not have 8 slides in addition to a cover slide and a reference slide. There is no consistent theme or design and slides are difficult to read.

Presentation does not have 8 slides in addition to a cover slide and a reference slide and/or there is no consistent theme or design in the presentation. Some slides may be difficult to read.

Presentation includes at least 8 slides in addition to a cover slide and a reference slide. There is a theme or design throughout the presentation, but some slides may contain too much information to be easily read.

Presentation includes 8 or more slides in addition to a cover slide and a reference slide. There is a consistent theme or design throughout, and all slides are easy to read.

7. Writing / Support for Ideas

Weight: 5%

Rarely uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Partially uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Mostly uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Consistently uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

8. Writing / Grammar and Mechanics

Weight: 5%

Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.Present both sides as to what was the cause of the civil war in a paper.: assignment help online
I’m trying to learn for my History class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

You will write a short research essay (7 pages), using APA citation format, on the two conflicting arguments as to what was the start of the civil war. After you PRESENT the two arguments in the paper, choose which you support.

i have provided the two sides of the argument to write about and sources you must cite with them.

– One side of the argument you will present is that the Civil War was started because of major economic issues and tariffs between the manufacturing north and the free-trade south were a main factor of the start of the civil war.

– The second side will be that the start of the war was simply over slavery, etc. which caused the secession of the south.

These are the correlating sources to be cited for this both of these arguments. Please add cited sources as you work on the research for the paper.

https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=29754

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2063869,00.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/five-myths-about-why-the-south-seceded/2011/01/03/ABHr6jD_story.html?utm_term=.2e9e29e96160

Debating the Causes of the Civil War

https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/reasons-secessionConditional probabilities
I need support with this Statistics question so I can learn better.

Finding a conditional Probability:

Example

Let’s look at a standard deck of 52 cards.

What is the probability of getting 2 kings assuming that the first one is not replaced?

4/52 * 3/51 = 1/13*1/17= 1/221

What is the probability of getting 2 kings assuming that the first one is replaced?

4/52 * 4/52 = 1/13 * 1/13 = 1/169

Instructions

Now for your main post do a similar problem using with replacement and without replacement. You can use a card problem as long as it is not 2 kings. Try your best to be original. This may not be 250 words. That is fine. Do not solve your own problems. Leave them for your classmates to work.

don’t use a deck of card please use something else

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services