Evaluating Sources/ CRAAP TEST

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m stuck on a English question and need an explanation.

For this week’s Discussion, there are a couple of components. First of all make sure you have reviewed The CRAAP Test and read Elizabeth Warren Wants to Eliminate Tuition at Public Colleges. Is That a Good Idea

Then, fill out the CRAAP Test Worksheet(based on the Elizabeth Warren article) and attach it to this Discussion, along with a brief paragraph in the Discussion, giving your overall thoughts on the credibility of the article.

it . . . but is it good information? You will have

to determine that for yourself, and the CRAAP Test can help. The CRAAP Test is a list of questions to help

you evaluate the information you find. Different criteria will be more or less important depending on your

situation or need.

Evaluation Criteria

Currency: The timeliness of the information.

 When was the information published or posted?

 Has the information been revised or updated?

 Does your topic require current information, or will older sources work as well?

Are the links functional?

Relevance: The importance of the information for your needs.

 Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?

 Who is the intended audience?

 Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)?

 Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use?

 Would you be comfortable citing this source in your research paper?

Authority: The source of the information.

 Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?

 What are the author’s credentials or organizational affiliations?

 Is the author qualified to write on the topic?

 Is there contact information, such as a publisher or email address?

Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?

examples: .com .edu .gov .org .net

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness and correctness of the content.

 Where does the information come from?

 Is the information supported by evidence?

 Has the information been reviewed or refereed?

 Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?

 Does the language or tone seem unbiased and free of emotion?

 Are there spelling, grammar or typographical errors?

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

 What is the purpose of the information? Is it to inform, teach, sell, entertain or persuade?

 Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?

 Is the information fact, opinion or propaganda?

 Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?

 Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional or personal biases?

9/17/10water pump presentation: assignment help online
I don’t understand this Powerpoint question and need help to study.

I want you to finish two section in this presentation on the file. the two section is the Organization Chart Inputs/Outputs, and the summary and recommendations.Political Science 101 Discussion Post Comment/response on a classmate’s post (Jason)
I’m studying for my Political Science class and need an explanation.

Chapter 14

There are several relationships between bureaucracy and democracy. The government bureaucracy is a necessary in many ways but not sufficient. It is a condition for democracy and several other things. It is a hierarchy with several established responsibilities and rules applied equally to all provides accounts for officials. Bureaucracy provides the regulations based on the tax policy enacted by elected legislature in democracy. The tax collectors authority is clearly spelled out on the regulations. If a tax collector oversteps his authority by trying to overtax people, officials take that away from him. One tactic they can use is termination. It is known to be one way or a certain way to reduce the size of bureaucracy. The tactic is to reduce or terminate all programs that are part of it. It is one way that they can reduce the agencies and the other parts of them. Many have leaned towards this strategy so they can remove the unpopular regulatory agencies, which can cut their budgets on contributions. This strategy is very effective because it closes out several resources for bureaucracy. Another thing they can do is devolution. Devolution is known to be an alternative to the reduction in the size of bureaucracy. The devolution and downsizing the federal bureaucracy by delegating the programs to state and local governments. Devolution changes the pattern of gets the most out of programs. It makes it even for all the programs. Devolution has brought in a lot of different faces to make decisions about certain topics like transportation and highways. The ultimate goal for devolution is to provide more flexible and efficient services for governments. The last strategy that can be used is privatization. This is another option that is very similar to termination. This strategy is not directly towards the programs but it targets smaller things like private contractors. Privatization means that a private company provides a public purpose under contract. It downsizes the government only in that the workers providing the service are no longer counted as part of the government bureaucracy. The main goal for privatization is to reduce the cost of government. Several government workers receive good pay and a lot of other benefits. Private companies do not get the same benefit as them and also get lower pay. Reform of public bureaucracies are always complex because strong companies might attempt to block changes that they think might harm them or their unions.Use r-stuido to answer questions about math
I’m working on a Mathematics question and need guidance to help me study.

This lab will introduce you to calculating confidence intervals using a set of data provided.

As discussed in lecture, confidence intervals are often calculated as a way to either assess how representative a sample is of a greater population, or a way to compare datasets.

The standard layout of confidence interval calculations is:

Mean value ± critical value * standard error

Remember though that you need to decide on what parameters you need to use for each of those parts of the formula.As discussed in class, this depends on whether the population standard deviation is known, the size of your sample, and whether the data is proportional (%) or not.

Demonstration Data:

Atmospheric CO2 has been strongly linked with rising global temperatures.This linkage has become increasingly apparent over the last few decades.In spite of efforts to curb the production of greenhouse gases, such as the Kyotyo Protocol, CO2 seems to be on the rise.To assess how much it has increased, you will be working CO2 concentrations (in parts per million [ppm]) measured by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminstration (NOAA) since 1959.

This data was collected in Hawaii.Unfortunately, the sensors used to measure the data are expensive and there are challenges with deploying measurement equipment in remote locations, especially where research facilities are lacking funding. We can use confidence intervals for the available data to provide an assessment of how representative the data are of a greater area (i.e. the region of the south Pacific Ocean).This lab will walk you through how to calculate (95%) confidence intervals.In other words, we will be 95% confident that the true mean for the entire south Pacific region will be within the confidence intervals that you calculate.

If interested, the source of the data can be found here:ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/products/trends/co2/co2_annmean_mlo.txt

You will then apply these steps to the data from Lab 1 to evaluate how representative the temperature data in Inuvik is of the entire region.response needed: assignment help online
Can you help me understand this Philosophy question?

for this assignment please respond to the following questions

Define abortion. Define a person. Are there any circumstances under which abortion should be legal? Is abortion equivalent to killing? Now consider other living things. Is it acceptable to kill animals for our consumption (food, clothes, mounted heads, rugs, sport, etc.)? Is a human embryo (unborn human) worth more than an animal? Explain. And, finally, is personhood a status that only humans can have? Why? Remember, be courteous. We will return to the question of animals later.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services