HUM101 Module 8: Portfolio Project (Final)

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Can you help me understand this Social Science question?

The following question is worth 300 points, or the majority of my final grade. Again this professor has been very difficult to work with and grades strictly off of the rubric. (100 level class with 500 level expectations) It is due no later than the 4th of Aug. at 12am. But would like to review it on the 2nd of Aug., giving time for any revisions.

Please let me know if you need any additional information to get started on it.

Thanks again!
Option #1: Critical Thinking Paper on Issue or Problem
Select an issue or problem that you wish to investigate critically. Formulate a question or thesis (Links to an external site.) on the issue so that your research has a clear and cogent direction.

Use Paul and Elder’s (2012) intellectual standards to find a topic or problem that is clear, relevant, significant, and precise.

Now, write a paper that addresses the problem or issue via scholarly sources. Your paper should include the following:
Title page: include your name, date, title of essay, and class Introduction: provide a two-paragraph introduction (Links to an external site.) that frames the issue or problem carefully Engagement with issue or problem using scholarly sources and the intellectual standards proposed by Paul and Elder (2012): What is the issue? Why is it significant? Why is this issue relevant to you (and/or your community)? What have you learned about the depth and breadth of the issue or problem from scholarly sources? How do the scholarly sources aid you in fair-mindedness and logic? Conclusion (Links to an external site.): Reflect on your issue or problem and how the sources informed your thinking. What have you learned? How can you apply the intellectual standards and elements of reason to this issue or problem to come to creative solutions? What critical questions remain? References Journal Submission. Each module lecture contains a section with journal prompts that focus on reflection and application of the module content. Use the Journal Template to record your answers for each module’s prompt(s). Include these entries at the end of your Final Portfolio.
Details
Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it is acceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources to support your inferences. Your paper should engage a minimum of six scholarly sources that are not required or recommended readings for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources. Your paper should be eight to ten pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.). Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font.
Keep in mind the following milestones throughout the course designed to assist you in crafting your Final Portfolio
Week 1: Submit Portfolio Topic (worth 25 points) Week 4: Submit Revised Portfolio Topic and Preliminary Outline (worth 25 points)
Refer to the Portfolio Project rubric below to understand how your project will be graded.
Option #2: Annotated Bibliography
Select an issue or problem that you wish to investigate critically. Formulate a question or thesis (Links to an external site.) on the issue so that your research has a clear and cogent direction.

Use Paul and Elder’s (2012) intellectual standards to find a topic or problem that is clear, relevant, significant, and precise.

Now, construct an annotated bibliography (Links to an external site.) that addresses the problem or issue through scholarly sources. See this example (Links to an external site.) for a good overview of how an annotated bibliography should be constructed. Your annotated bibliography should include the following:
Title page: include your name, date, title of annotated bibliography, and class Introduction (Links to an external site.): provide a two-paragraph introduction that frames the issue or problem carefully Annotations (Links to an external site.): Summarize the main point or arguments of each scholarly source. What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? Each annotation should be roughly one or two paragraphs in length. Conclusion (Links to an external site.): Reflect on your issue or problem and how the sources informed your thinking. What have you learned? How can you apply the intellectual standards and elements of reason to this issue or problem to come to creative solutions? References Journal Submission. Each module lecture contains a section with journal prompts that focus on reflection and application of the module content. Use the Journal Template to record your answers for each module’s prompt(s). Include these entries at the end of your Final Portfolio.
Details
Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it is acceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources to support your inferences. Your annotated bibliography should include a minimum of 15 scholarly sources that are not required or recommended readings for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources. Your paper annotated bibliography should be eight to ten pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.). Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font. Refer to the Revision Checklist (Links to an external site.) for an overview of items to consider as you add final polish to your draft.
Keep in mind the following milestones throughout the course designed to assist you in crafting your Final Portfolio
Week 1: Submit Portfolio Topic (worth 25 points) Week 4: Submit Revised Portfolio Topic and Preliminary Outline (worth 25 points)
Refer to the Portfolio Project rubric below to understand how your project will be graded.

Rubric

HUM101 Mod 8 PP

HUM101 Mod 8 PP
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

40.0 to >32.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of critical thinking; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

32.0 to >24.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

24.0 to >16.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

16.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis

45.0 to >36.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

36.0 to >27.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

27.0 to >18.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

18.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

45.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis and Evaluation

30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation

Information is from reliable source(s); interpretation and/or evaluation is rigorous, affording a comprehensive and coherent analysis or synthesis.

24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Information is from reliable source(s); interpretation and/or evaluation approaches course expectations in developing a coherent analysis or synthesis.

18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation

Reliability or relevance of sources or information is questionable. Some interpretation and/or evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.

12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Reliability or relevance of sources or information is questionable. Little to no interpretation and/or evaluation.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis

35.0 to >28.0 pts Meets Expectation

Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.

28.0 to >21.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.

21.0 to >14.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.

14.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.

35.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Journal Submissions

30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation

All journal entries are completed. Each journal submission engages with assigned material. Each submission uses tools of the module to address issues of critical reasoning.

24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation

At least six journal entries are completed. At least six journal submissions engage with assigned materials and use tools of the module to address issues of critical reasoning.

18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation

18 to 13 Points: At least four journal entries are completed. At least four journal submissions engage with assigned materials and use tools of the module to address issues of critical reasoning.

12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

At least two journal entries are completed. At least two journal submissions engage with assigned materials and use tools of the module to address issues of critical reasoning.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources

15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least six to five credible sources.

12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates four to three credible sources.

9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation

9 to 7 Points: Cites and integrates two to one credible sources.

6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Source Material

15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization

20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar and Style

20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style

20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.

16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.

12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.

8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.

20.0 pts

Total Points: 300.0I need a discussion post in APA style: nursing coursework help
Need help with my Management question – I’m studying for my class.

Chapters 30, 31, and 34 presented three mini-case studies on ERM and risk. Each one presented a slightly different risk scenario. Suppose General Motors wants to replace one of their traditional lines of vehicles with all electric models. How could GM use game theory to identify and assess the major risks to this decision? Identify two major risks that would result from GM converting an existing line to an all-electric line. Provide a brief discussion of each risk, and your assessment of the levels of inherent, current, and residual risk, using GM’s five point scale.

To complete this assignment, you must do the following: Suppose General Motors wants to replace one of their traditional lines of vehicles with all electric models. How could GM use game theory to identify and assess the major risks to this decision? Identify two major risks that would result from GM converting an existing line to an all-electric line. Provide a brief discussion of each risk, and your assessment of the levels of inherent, current, and residual risk, using GM’s five point scale.

A) Create a new thread. As indicated above,

ANSWER ALL OF THE QUESTIONS ABOVE IN YOUR THREAD

Please have it in APA stylechild sexual abuse
I need support with this Sociology question so I can learn better.

A. Evaluate Finkelhor’s multi-causal theory of the sexual abuse of children. Is his theory more useful than any other theories applied to family violence this semester? How so? Does Finkehlhor’s theory apply to both male and female offenders/abusers? Male and female victims? Why or why not?

B. In lecture, material was presented which discussed why particular cases may or may not come to the attention of Child Protective services. Compare and contrast the weaknesses of using official reports to quanitify the incidence of physical child abuse versus sexual child abuse. Be sure to discuss at least two weaknesses of each. Based upon your comparison and contrast, which reports do you find most valid (reliable/ representative/useful)?

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services