This Is For Eetores The Man!

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I need an explanation for this Film question to help me study.

Auteur Project (250 pts)

You will be selecting a filmmaker from the list

provided and conducting an “auteur” study of that director,

watching at least 2 of her/his/their films, researching their life

and work, observing their characteristic themes and stylistic

choices, and presenting what you found in an online Auteur Workshop

(small group forum on Brightspace) during our final week of the

semester. Depending on the director you choose, you will be

placed into a smaller group to post/share/present/discuss your work.

Group pages will be established on our course site.

Format & Submission: This project contains three components:
RESEARCH & WRITING: a 3-4 page research and analysis paper, with Works Cited, summarizing the results of your research and screening of your chosen director’s work, submitted using Turnitin AND posted to your assigned Auteur Workshop Group Forum. PRESENTING: selecting a representative film clip to be posted/linked to the Auteur Workshop Group Discussion Forum AND the whole class forum (called Auteur Directors Extravaganza!), including a 2-3 paragraph presentation to introduce and analyze the clip, explaining why it is an interesting example of the work of your chosen director. WORKSHOPPING: reading your groupmates papers, participating in a “group interview,” and discussing each other’s directors in your Auteur Workshop Group Forum.

Your Projects are DUE Friday, July 26th by midnight (or earlier): your research and analysis papers are to be submitted on Assessment/Assignments AND uploaded to your Auteur Workshop Group Forum, along with your 2-3 paragraph presentation and clip. Your presentation and clip are also due on the whole class forum “Auteur Directors Extravaganza!”

Your group’s discussion forum and interview (with Amanda and your groupmates) will continue through Sunday, July 28th, to wrap up by midnight (or earlier)

While you will be presenting and discussing your chosen director in a group, this is NOT a group project! You will be completing your own study of your chosen director and will be solely responsible for your work, and only your work.

Director Selection: Take a close look at the list of directors provided below and pull out a few directors who speak to you; spend some time on www.imdb.com to learn more about each one! Also check out how readily available their films are to you – library, rental, online, etc. Then SELECT ONE DIRECTOR – your top choice, followed by your second and third, just in case – by filling out the attached form and copying it into an e-mail to me.

I will accept and approve your requests on a first-come-first-approved basis, beginning immediately! We are aiming for a diverse selection of filmmakers to explore and a manageable number of people in each group, so I am asking for your back-up choices just in case. If your first choice director is already taken we will move down your preferences. There are plenty of filmmakers to choose from; however, this is not an exhaustive list! So if you are interested in working on a director not listed, please let me know on your form and I will likely okay it!

FIRST REQUESTS ARE DUE: Wednesday, July 17th by midnight (or earlier!) CORRECTIONS AND LATE REQUESTS WILL BE ACCEPTED THROUGH: Saturday, July 20th

Research: Use our CCC libraries – and other trusted research resources – to do some research on your selected director’s life and work. Be sure to find reliable sources! (e.g. Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source!) Don’t forget to start with our text and make use of their bibliographical references! Search our library’s databases for academic/film journals! You should end up with a variety of sources – books and academic journal articles are the most trustworthy; online sources are iffy, so you should only rely on these for immediate and/or extra information and make sure that they are .edu, .org., or .gov with a reputable author! Once you have found your sources, read them, taken notes, and used them to gain a strong understanding of your director and her/his reception in the film world. You will use this research in your paper and provide a Works Cited page.

Screening: Use all available sources at your disposal to locate at least TWO film selections from your director (the more the better, though!) Here are some suggestions: your favorite video rental place, Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, Chicago Public Library, HWC collection (please search our library catalog and see me for access), Facets www.facets.org, film collections at other colleges and universities (if you have access), film student friends, each other! If you run into trouble finding anything, ask for help – sooner rather than later! Once you have the films in hand, screen them in their entirety! Watch for similarities in style, narrative, content, symbolism, and technique; take notes; look for evidence of your research.

Writing: Gather your impressions about your director’s stylistic approach, thematic and/or narrative concerns, place in Hollywood film history and genres, and what makes her/him/them unique. What makes this person recognizable as an “auteur” director? When you feel confident in your own response to the films, WRITE! You are aiming for a 3-4 page research and analysis paper, revolving around what you found to be your most interesting discovery about this director. Be sure to rely on your observations of the films themselves to support your claims and use your research only in support of your own points. You are NOT regurgitating a biography of your director!!! Bo-ring! Instead, pick one or two things you found most interesting from your research and from your screening of the films and revolve your discussion around that. Be sure to CITE ALL OF YOUR SOURCES! If you are uncertain how to do this, please ask! Our CCC Writing Centers are awesome resources for this too, along with the Online Writing Lab at Purdue.edu and other online writing resources.

Posting/Submitting: You will be officially submitting your research and writing in TWO locations: 1) upload your reflection paper and works cited page as one file using the submission link provided on the Assignments page of our Bsb site, and 2) post an additional copy of the same on your group forum.

Auteur Workshop: Select a short film clip from your director (no more than 3-5 minutes) that you think serves as an interesting example of her/his/their work. Then prepare a 2-3 paragraph introduction to your director and this clip, to set it up. Post this clip and your introduction to: 1) the your GROUP FORUM, and 2) our full class forum Extravaganza. (DUE 7/26). Then, check back 2-3 times over the next 48 hours, to read and comment on your groupmates projects and clips; you will also be participating in a “group interview”, in which you will be asked a selection of questions about taking an auteur approach, reflecting on what you learned through the project. Amanda will post these questions to you and help facilitate discussion. Responding as promptly as possible, to give everyone else a chance to read and respond, will mean that we can more thoroughly and more efficiently complete the workshop and conclude no later than Sunday, July 28th by midnight (or earlier!)

Evaluation: Please see the evaluation sheet below…

Auteur Project Evaluation

______ Preparation & Research (50 pts) Loos’ Notes:

____ relevant & reliable sources

____ film choices

____ screening & methods

______ Reflection Paper (100 pts.)

____ MLA format/works cited

____ length/thoroughness (3-4 pages)

____ thesis/organization

____ engagement/analysis/research/films

____ writing quality/overall sophistication

______ Online Workshop (100 pts.)

____ clip selection

____ intro/clip setup (2-3 paragraphs)

____ interview participation and answers

____ engagement with colleagues and their work (2-3 discussion postings)

____ thoughtfulness/relevance

____ timeliness

TOTAL _______/250

Comments:Citizen participation: my nursing assignment help
I need support with this Philosophy question so I can learn better.

Citizen participation is at the cornerstone of an effective and representative government. Take some time to consider the issue and get involved.

There are two parts to this forum. You need to complete both for full credit.

Part 1:

How realistic is the New Public Service? Give examples of seeing it in action.

What variables affect the level of citizen involvement in local politics?

What might increase our national level of interest and participation?

What would motivate you to become more active?

Part 2: Get out and do it! Apply what you have learned and engage!

A good starting point may be a topic from this class that piqued your interest (think gun violence in schools, military retirement). Write your representatives, join a PAC, or share your thoughts with member of your local or state government. Then, report back to the class on what you have done! Or in the alternative, attend a meeting, volunteer at a nonprofit or show public service in some other manner.HIS 202 AJA review
I’m studying and need help with a History question to help me learn.

Recommendation
The instructor recommends allotting 300 minutes to complete this assignment. Time Recommendation: 180 minutes to read the academic journal article and 120 minutes to write and edit the 2-page review. This is only a recommendation, you may spend more or less time on this assignment depending on your ability and availability.
Introduction
Historians love to review the works of other historians. Whenever a new history book is written, the historical profession selects experts in particular fields of studies to determine the value and contribution the new work will have on the academic discipline. Upon completion of the course’s reading, each student will be considered an expert and be required to read an academic article and submit a 2-page review (minimum). Students are encouraged to celebrate the author’s accomplishments, but also challenge anything that seems substandard. Style and creativity play a crucial role in the success of your review.
Pick one of the Academic Journal Articles below:
African American History in the Reshaping of the Twentieth-.pdf Alcatraz Wounded Knee and Beyond Ask and Tell Gay Veterans Identity and Oral History How the United States Justified Its War on Terrorism Locating the Voices of the Sterilized Missiles and Memory The American Habit of Empire, and the Cases of Polk and Bush The Masculinity of the Governator The Religious Right and the Carter Administration.pdf
Format
Two pages (minimum) 12 point font Double spaced Paragraphs
Each paper should include the following:
The author’s purpose in writing the article The author’s main thesis The author’s challenging of other historical viewpoints The evidence utilized by the author (specifically primary sources) Personal likes/dislikes How could the author make the work stronger? The recommended audience for the article? Explain how this article contributes to understanding the history of the United States An example of how this article supports/contradicts Eric Foner’s Give Me Liberty Suggested reading to accompany this work (not required, but helpful)
Helpful Information
Click here for a step by step guide to writing a successful AJA Review Click here to discover the difference between a primary and secondary source.
Instructions for Submitting
On the right-hand side of the screen click on the icon that says “SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT” Click on the tab “File Upload” to attach your AJA Review. Click on the tab “Text Entry” if you wish to copy and paste OR write your review in the box provided. Be sure to click “SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT” after you finishing uploading the document. If you need help converting pages click on this link.
Rubric

The AJA Rubric (1) (1)

The AJA Rubric (1) (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePage and Format Requirement
30.0 pts

Meets minimum page requirement (2 full pages).
5.0 pts

Does not meet minimum page requirement (1.5 pages or less)

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAJA Requirements and Quality
30.0 pts

Answers the specific AJA requirements. Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.
25.0 pts

Answers most of the AJA requirements, however, may miss one of the following (thesis, purpose, relationship to history, or target audience). Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.
20.0 pts

Answers many of the AJA requirements, however, missed more than one of the following (thesis, purpose, relationship to history, or target audience). Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.
15.0 pts

May have met all the AJA requirements, however did not incorporate pertinent and detailed information from the scholarly work and/or sidetracked off into a reactionary tangent. Presents information in a manner that is sometimes unclear, and/or has significant organization problems. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.
10.0 pts

May have met all the AJA requirement, however did not incorporate pertinent and detailed information from the scholarly work and/or sidetracked off into a reactionary tangent. Provides no information that can be understood or related to the specific topic May lack any recognizable organization May contain enough distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems to make it substantially incomprehensible.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrimary Source Identification
20.0 pts

Identified 3 specific primary sources.
15.0 pts

Identified 2 specific primary sources.
10.0 pts

Identified 1 specific primary source.
8.0 pts

Identified primary sources, but not specific.
1.0 pts

Identified the wrong source.
0.0 pts

No attempt made to identify primary sources.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTextbook Critical Analysis
20.0 pts

Support/contradict the textbook with a direct quote from textbook.
15.0 pts

Support/contradiction validated with page number or chapter reference instead of a direct quote.
10.0 pts

Support/contradiction asserted without any specific validation from the textbook using a direct quote. Does include a generalized narrative of why support/contradict the textbook.
5.0 pts

Support/contradiction asserted without any specific validation from the textbook using a direct quote. Also lacks any sort of generalize narrative of why support or contradiction was proposed.
2.0 pts

Student stated that it did not support or contradict the textbook without validation.
1.0 pts

Student obviously did not read the book so their analysis of support or contradiction is too general, too vague, and/or incorrect.
0.0 pts

No support/contradiction of the textbook.

20.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services