Reflection Comparing The Similarities And Differences About Angel Island

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Help me study for my History class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

Write a 400 to 500-word reflection on some of the similarities and differences between the treatment of Chinese migrants at Angel Island in the early 20th century with more recent examples of America detaining migrants and asylum seekers considered “undesirable” by political officials.

Your write-up should engage with Li-Shin Yu’s The Chinese Exclusion Act, chapter 5 of Shelley Sang-Hee Lee’s book, and at least 2 news reports from established media outlets like (New York Times, NPR, UK’s Guardian, etc.) Please use the standards outlined by Wynne Davis in their article “Fake or Real? How to Self-Check the News and Get the Facts” (Links to an external site.) when selecting the sources you use in your reflection. Also, provide links to your sources.paper about sex: nursing homework help
I’m studying for my Philosophy class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

An important aspect of philosophical thinking is the ability to do conceptual analysis. Greta Christina‘s paper is a great example of this. Throughout her paper, she proposes a definition of sex, discusses how that definition captures several cases that intuitively count as sex, but then discusses some more complicated cases that either show that the definition is too broad (i.e., it includes or counts some case as an instance of sex when intuitively it should not) or too narrow (i.e., it excludes some case from counting as an instance of sex when we intuitively think it should count).

This paper assignment is divided into two parts.

Part one:

Expand on one of Greta Christina’s several different definitions of sex and explain how that definition is problematic. For example, Christina says, “Perhaps having sex with someone is the conscious, consenting, mutually acknowledged pursuit of shared sexual pleasure.” You might explain this definition (or one of the other ones that she considers) by giving a (fictional) example and showing how it exemplifies each of the features listed in the definition. Then, you should explain why that definition is problematic. For example, you could explain how there are cases that we intuitively count (or don’t count) as sex but aren’t (or are) counted as sex according to the definition (i.e., state whether the definition is too broad or too narrow, or both, and show how).

Part two:

This part has two options. The first is less challenging than the second, but the second, if done well, can score higher points than the first.

Option 1 : Clearly articulate a second definition from Christina that attempts to address some of the problematic aspects of the definition you discussed in part one. Then, as you did in part one, explain how even this second definition could be problematic (Is it too broad? too narrow? both? Show how).

Option 2 : Propose your own definition — a definition of sex that Christina does not consider. Show how that definition might handle some of the complicated cases that she discusses. Then, clearly state what the shortcomings of your proposed definition might be. For example, you should clearly state how the definition could be too broad or too narrow (or both) by presenting relevant counterexamples.

You should take as a clear example of good writing the last two pages of Christina’s essay. Notice how she structures the discussion. She considers a definition. Then she discusses how some cases clearly fit that definition, then some cases that don’t (AGAIN either because the definition is too broad, i.e. it includes cases that do not count as sex, or because the definition is too narrow, i.e. the definition excludes cases that do count as sex).

With that in mind, this paper will be graded according to the following rubric:

(10 points) Part One: Clear presentation of definition from Christina. Persuasively shows why definition is unsatisfactory.

(10 points) Part Two: Clear presentation and discussion of a definition of sex that follows up on the definition in part one (either from Christina or your own). In the case that the presentation is another definition from Christina, make sure that the discussion of it is clear and that any problems with it are clearly stated. In the case that you present your own definition, it is important to demonstrate BOTH an understanding of how the proposed definition captures several complications discussed in the reading AND recognizing potential difficulties with the definition.

(2 points) Overall structure: Is the discussion well-ordered and easy to follow?

(1 point) Grammar and spelling: Are there errors in spelling and/or grammar?

(2 points) Style: Is the writing clear and concise (that’s good), or is it obscure (that’s bad)?

SUBMISSION METHOD:Choose only ONE of the three submission options:1) Submit your paper as an attachment in PDF FORM.2) Submit your paper as an attachment in WORD (doc or docx) FORMAT.3) Submit your paper by copying and pasting it in the INLINE submission.

FORMATTING:

Papers should be 3 pages double spaced, 1″ margins, 12pt font (preferably New Times Roman, but anything that’s easy to read is acceptable). To be clear, formatting is not nearly as important as the content of the paper. If you happen to go over or under by a few lines, don’t fret. Especially DO NOT try to make it appear as if you’ve written more than you have. Again, it’s what you’ve said and how you’ve said it that matters, not how the words on the page appear.Based on your research, do you agree, disagree, or both agree and disagree with arguments Hipps makes in his article?
I don’t understand this English question and need help to study.

Essay 1: Summary/Response (Closely Modeled on Dr. Karen Cox’s assignment) Summary: Learning to summarize the ideas of others is an essential skill for college students. In brief (we will go more in-depth during the summary writing mini-unit), a summary is a condensed version of an article, essay, or story. This condensed version is written in your own words (also called paraphrasing). An effective summary should:

● Present the author’s thesis and key ideas (supporting points), omitting supporting details

● Be concise but still thorough (a reader should understand all key ideas of the text from beginning to end)

● Be accurate and objective

● Be paraphrased (though you may include limited direct quotations)

Response: Through the semester, we will spend time reflecting on the impact a piece of writing has on its readers. The impact may be a personal one (text-self); it may have broader social impact or global impact (text-world). Spending some time absorbing the various ways a text “matters” also helps readers draw connections between that text and others (text-text), between ideas presented there and elsewhere.

Writing Assignment: You will be writing a minimum 4 page evaluation essay for Shane Hipps’ “Is Facebook Killing Our Souls?” For this essay assignment you will both summarize and then evaluate through agreement or disagreement two points presented in his article.

Essay Question: Based on your research, do you agree, disagree, or both agree and disagree with arguments Hipps makes in his article?

Research Requirement: You must use at least one (independently found) scholarly outside sources (sources from peer reviewed academic journals). *If you use one from the pdf files I emailed to you, it will not count toward the independently found scholarly source. Personal evidence is limited to one response paragraph and will not count towards a researched scholarly source.

Please use the following five paragraph organization:

❖ In the introductory paragraph, open with a hook that explores the larger essay topic (individual human identity and social media). You should also provide appropriate context by introducing the article (include the author’s full name and the full title of the article) and offering a one sentence that paraphrases the author’s thesis. Finally, end your introductory paragraph by offering your readers direction through your own thesis that answers the essay question stating your response to the article.

❖ The second paragraph will be the summary paragraph. In this paragraph, you will summarize the article clearly and concisely. We will be working on this summary during our summary mini-unit, but do review the instructions above about summary writing.

❖ In the third paragraph, you will draft your 1st response. Here you will have a chance to state which of his points you agree with/disagree with and then develop your agreement/disagreement. *Yes, you will use a TEEAS frame for this response paragraph.

❖ In the fourth paragraph, you will draft your 2nd response. Here you will have a chance to state which of his other points you agree/disagree with and then develop your agreement/disagreement. *Yes, you will use a TEEAS frame for this response paragraph

❖ The final concluding paragraph should be thoughtful. Here you will need to give your audience a closing thought to ponder.

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services