3 Page Essay – Keywords Assignment – “Transnationalism”

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I don’t understand this English question and need help to study.

“Reflect on one of the following keywords from Keywords for Latina/o Studies (link below): Modernity, Diaspora, Nationalism, Transnationalism, Sovereignty, Brown, Territoriality, Illegality, Race, Indigeneity, Citizenship, Mestizaje, or Othering.

Instructions

a) Discuss how the keyword is presented in our course assignments and lectures.

b) Compare how this keyword is contextualized in our class with the OED definition of the term.

c) Reflect on questions you may have about the keyword.

d) Point to specific examples in readings, lecture notes, and class discussions.

This assignment must be 3 double-spaced pages in length, typed in Times New Roman 12 font, double-spaced with margins of 1-inch margins on all sides. Please include page numbers in your document. Make sure to cite any authors you quote or paraphrase (and include their bibliography)”CJ 560 3-1 Final Project Milestone One: Draft of Background
Can you help me understand this Law question?

Please follow all instructions and rubric

The O.J Simpson Murder Trial

Instructions

This milestone will allow you to complete the Background portion of your final project.

Use the case you identified in Module One to complete this assignment. In this milestone, create a draft that addresses the following:
Facts: Provide a clear, succinct, and accurate summary of the key facts of the case. For instance, on what date(s) did the crime occur? Who was involved? What weapon was used (if there was one)? Timeline: Develop a clear, accurate timeline of your controversial court case that summarizes the decision of the court. Specifically, the timeline of your case should include:
The legal issues The judicial proceedings The procedural history The holding(s)
Verdict: Defend, with evidence, your position on the court’s verdict. In other words, did the court issue the most appropriate verdict in the case? Why or why not? Ensure that you communicate your defense clearly and effectively. Type of Court: Explain where (local, state, or federal court) the case was tried, specifically including whether the case was tried in civil court as well as criminal court. Why was the case tried in civil court, or why was it not? Similarities: Explain the similarities between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual or potential) for your case. Differences: Explain the differences between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual or potential) for your case.
To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric document.

The O.J Simpson Murder Trial

People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson was a criminal case that took place in the LA County Superior Court. Mr. Simpson, a former NFL player, was tried in 1994 on two accounts of murder (CNN, 2013). He was accused of stabbing and slashing his estranged wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ron Goldman. The two were found stabbed to death, and O.J Simpson immediately became a person of interest; Simpson failed to turn himself in, but later on, a police pursuit ensued.

The trial lasted for almost eleven months. Simpson pleaded not guilty, and in October 1995, O.J Simpson was acquitted on both murder accounts. After the murder trial, the families of Goldman and Brown filed lawsuits against O.J Simpson. In February 1997, the Jury made a unanimous decision that Simpson was found responsible for double homicide (CNN, 2013). The two families were awarded punitive and compensatory damages that totaled to $ 33.5 million.

Substantive Law V. Procedural Law

Procedural law is made up of a set of rules that govern the proceedings of the court in civil and criminal lawsuits as well as administrative proceedings. The rules ensure consistency and fair practice in the due process (Cuadrado, 2012). Substantive law is also a statutory dealing with legal interactions between individuals or people and state. While procedural law lay the rules and procedure of a case proceeding, substantive law outlines both the rights and duty of the people. For instance, in procedural law, arrests must be made but on probable cause, and if a person is convicted, they have the chance to appeal (Cuadrado, 2012). Unlike substantive law, procedural law lacks deciding power. While procedural law is regulated by statutory law, substantive law an Act of Parliament. Both laws dictate how people should act, and they also work together to ensure that proper procedures are followed in trial, whether in a criminal or civil case.

CNN (2013). O.J. Simpson Fast Facts. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/12/us/o-j-simpson-fast-facts/index.html

Cuadrado, C. (2012). Presentation Unit 1. Procedural Law. Introducción al Derecho Procesal. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/20706/2/PROCEDURAL_LAW.pdf

Kadian-Baumeyer, K. (n.d.). Substantive Law vs. Procedural Law: Definitions and Differences. Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/substantive-law-vs-procedural-law-definitions-and-differences.html

Procedural Law. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/procedural_law

Substantive Law. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/substantive_lawPhilosophy Discussion: nursing essay help
I don’t know how to handle this Philosophy question and need guidance.

There are TWO discussions for this post! Read directions carefully!

The Allegory Cave Discussion:

In Plato’s “ Allegory of the Cave” the truth is held to be valuable both instrumentally and intrinsically. We have power and choices when we know the truth that we don’t have when we don’t know the truth. And knowing the truth, even an ugly one, is still better than being victim to a beautiful lie, even when there is no instrumental value to be had in knowing the truth. Do you agree? Is it always better to know the truth, even when it is ugly and disturbing?

A few specific examples may serve to underscore the importance of the question and to demonstrate what is at stake. You need not answer all these questions, but you may find that responding to one of them will help you answer the overarching question of whether it is always better to know the truth:
If your boyfriend, girlfriend, husband, or wife was cheating on you, would you want to know? Why or why not? If your government or religious administration was corrupt would you want to know? Why or why not? If your friends really thought poorly of you would you want to know? Why or why not? If God does not exist, would you want to know? Why or why not?
(Please note: students must first create a thread in order to view other threads in this forum. Only after your post will you be able to post your comment to another student’s thread.)

Philosophy of Religion Discussion:

In this Discussion Board, students will demonstrate their understanding of the various arguments that seek to prove God’s existence, and then argue on behalf of a specific position regarding whether or not you think there is sufficient evidence to prove God’s existence.

Note: No argument that we look at in this learning module is perfect. There are criticisms of all of the arguments that seek to prove God’s existence, and the problem of evil – which is often used as an argument that seeks to prove that God does not exist – has several good explanations as to how God and evil could coexist. Thus, the assignment asks whether or not there is sufficient (not certain, but “enough”) evidence to prove God’s existence.

As always, be sure to back up your position with good, substantive reasoning.

(Please note: students must first create a thread in order to view other threads in this forum. Only after your post will you be able to post your comment to another student’s thread.)

0 0

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services