Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
I don’t know how to handle this Psychology question and need guidance.
One research paper will be required in this course. This paper will consist of selecting an appropriate topic from the course and presenting current and relevant research related to this topic. The research may include many psychological and sociological facets related to your topic, as well as current controversies about the topic that are being currently researched. All topics must be approved by your instructor and papers must not be reused from previous courses. Your references must come from professional, peer-reviewed research in the area of psychology. Examples of acceptable references include the Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Perception, Vision Research, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, and Chemical Senses, just to name a few. Your instructor will discuss the reference issue in more detail during class. Students will summarize the gathered research into a coherent and meaningful synthesis of information. The length your research paper must be 8-10 pages (not including a cover sheet, abstract page, and reference page. There should be a minimum of 8 references, but more is usually better. These pages should be double spaced between lines using a 12-point font (Times New Roman or Courier New). There should be a cover page, an abstract page, and a reference page.Critical Thinking: Assessing Truth Claims
I’m trying to learn for my Philosophy class and I’m stuck. Can you help?
I found this chapter particularly insightful, especially the general comments in §6.3 about what kind of defense is required in accepting statements and beliefs: “In some contexts there are statements that are a matter of common knowledge and for which it is quite unnecessary to require a defense. . . [But,] the idea of common knowledge is a relative term that depends upon the shared assumptions of a community or group.” (¶6). If you are making religious statements to your own religious community, there may be so many shared assumptions that little to no evidence is demanded (likewise with a homogenous political community). The shared assumptions of an academiccommunity, though, should be very minimal — the belief in freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry, and the belief in there being universal criteria for good reasoning. Beyond that (and for the sake of institutional disconfirmation) students and faculty should embrace opportunities to inquire into and question a variety of statements. For this discussion, please mention a non-empirical belief that you endorse in your personal life (it’s up to you what you would like to share with your classmates). Suggest some evidence for your belief that would be acceptable to the different communities to which you belong (I’m not asking for strict proof) — you can mention your family unit, your religious or political community, etc. At the very least, make sure to include the very diverse community of SFSU students to which you belong: can you provide evidence that would be acceptable most of your fellow SFSU students? It’s OK if you can’t! Admitting this is just as important for the cultivation of intellectual humility and also to fuel your continued inquiry into something important to you… For your REPLY to your classmates’ answers to this question, you can politely mention whether the evidence they provide is acceptable to you and why (here, refer to §6.6-7)5 pages of Labels in Everyday Life: assignment help online
I’m stuck on a Communications question and need an explanation.
PLEASE WRITE THE SIMPLE LANGUAGE ANDTELL ME WHAT THREE SITUATIONS YOU WANT TO WIRTE.. GIVE ME AN OUTLINE AND AFTER I SAID THATS OK YOU CAN CONTINUE WORK ON THE ESSAY !!!!!!!!
this essay asks you to become an ethnographer — a studied observer of everyday life — to identify a category produced by communicative interactions of talk, gesture, and/or artifact use. Each of the social scientists discussed in lecture in Week 6 and 7 talk about how people assign and live through categories in everyday life, though they use various terms like “labels” (McDermott & Varenne), “coding schemes” (Goodwin), and “‘legitimate’ or ‘authentic’ performance or product” (Strauss). Through communicative interactions, people label one another, make standards, and draw boundaries between what is legitimate and illegitimate. You will draw on the labeling practices explained by McDermott & Varenne (e.g. “learning disabled”), Strauss (e.g. “a new school of ‘art’,” “pilots,” or “science”), and Goodwin (e.g. “period of de-escalation”).
Your job will be to detect a category that is organizing some aspect of everyday life around you. Carefully observe what people say and do. Look for how people act on the basis of labels and categories in interaction. Drawing on Strauss, you might look for the subsocial worlds to which people belong and how they draw boundaries between their practices and others. Drawing on McDermott, you might observe how people act based on categories that acquire them and others. Drawing on Goodwin, you might observe how people teach others how to see people and things as examples of a category. And, most importantly, notice what practices rely on those categories, whether taken for granted or in dispute.
Step 1: Observe (Notes of observations)
Observe everyday life and look for a category at work. Examples from lecture include “yoga”, “bikram yoga,” “female”/”male”/”trans”, and “learning disabled”. Do this by opening your eyes as you go about daily life and noticing the ways people organize their relationships through such categories. Categories come to life and are maintained by communicative interactions of talk, gesture, and/or artifact use.
Keep notes on your observations. For ideas of how to observe and document, see McDermott & Varenne, as well as Goodwin, for examples of how to notice and describe details of activities, interactions, talk, and tools. Pocket notecards, emails to yourself, and voice memos are convenient ways to take notes on your observations as you go. Photographs can help you remember physical layout, gesture, or artifacts in a situation.
This observational work is not the sort of thing that you can cram at the last minute, as you can’t control when the world gives you interesting examples.
Step 2: Document and Analyze (6 paragraphs) Make sure you wirte three situations on the college students daily life
Describe and analyze your observations of three situations in which you observed the category in practice. For each situation, give one paragraph of detailed description and one paragraph of reflective analysis drawing on the readings. Make sure your assignment draws on at least two course readings.
Description paragraph: Describe each situation in detail to offer a clear picture of the observed practices so a reader who wasn’t there can see and follow the interaction. Make sure your description makes clear how you know the category was recognized — whether accepted or disputed — by multiple participants in the situation. In other words, your observations should provide evidence that the category mattered to people — that they organized their interactions by drawing on it.
Analysis paragraph: Analyze the situation by drawing on concepts from the readings. Use the readings to show how there is more to the observed practice than meets the eye. This is a chance to be creative with the concepts and arguments from the readings.
Step 3: Submit your description and analyses of situations 1, 2, and 3, along with your collected notes attached to the end of your document. For voice memos, upload them to Google Drive and include a URL link so your TA can access them.
