Art Reaction Paper 2 Trend Book

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

I’m studying for my Art & Design class and need an explanation.

SOURCE: David Trend, Elsewhere in America LENGTH: 400-600 words DUE: Tuesday, March 3 11:59 pm) SUBMISSION: Online WEIGHT: 10% of course grade
Pick one of the prompts below and write a formal academic essay in response. (Formal writing means structure [introà body paragraphsà conclusion], development of argument [thesis, claims supported by evidence, logical argument], formal English, and footnotes[1] for citation.) Also, double-space and use proper margins. You will submit this assignment through Canvas(click on the essay assignment).
Trend argues that the United States is an “unfinished project.” [2] How does he mean this claim with respect to the United States having an aspirational culture? How does he understand it to include the potential for outsiders to belong to American culture? Trend argues that culture helps frame boundaries for including or excluding certain subjectivities. With respect to at least two distinct groups, how does Trend suggest these groups struggled to change their status from “not belonging” to “belonging”? Trend wonders what might happen if the notion of “identity” was treated as nothing more than “fiction.”[3] Discuss the ways in which at least one identity you claim has become important to your sense of belonging (or lack thereof) in some aspect of your life. In what ways is that identity a basis for you activism/engagement with the world. How is it more than a fiction? Arguments about religion and morality lie at the heart of much conflict in contemporary society. Describe three issues profiled by Trend that have matters of faith at the core of the conflict.

[1] Footnotes should follow either the Turabian or (the nearly indistinguishable) Chicago style. For a convenient guide to footnote citation systems, please consult either of these websites. They present the same information but package it different ways so rely on the one you find easier to comprehend. Alternatively, look at how Trend organizes his citations and copy what he did. A simple example (citing a book by a single author) is fn. 7 (p. 28). https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/turabian-footnote-guide (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) OR http://www.press.uchicago.edu/books/turabian/turabian_citationguide.html (Links to an external site.)

[2] David Trend, Elsewhere in America: The Crisis of Belonging in Contemporary American Culture (Routledge, 2016), 99. [This is how a first citation of a book with one author should look.].

[3] Trend, 123. Trend follows up that speculation by sourly observing that such thinking amounts to “utopian silliness.” This passage from Chapter 6 thus seeds his discussion of this country’s utopian aspirationalism in Chapter 12. [This footnote models how a second citation of a previously cited source should look. The next two sentences demonstrate the footnote’s other function, as a place to expand upon an idea raised in the main text.]Revise This Assignment: nursing assignment help services
I’m working on a English question and need guidance to help me study.

Please revise the assignment, and I will upload a sample for this.

It will be graded on the following criteria:

–complete list of academic and reliable sources

–correct MLA format throughout

–accurate and complete annotations

–correct grammar and syntax

–academic vocabulary

–proofread and clean of all typos and sloppy writing

And this Annotated Bibliography is based on the Essay, I also will upload the essay below.

the first one is the essay, second one is the one you need to revise, the third one is the sample.Project 2 Argument Analysis & Evaluation Essay
I’m studying for my English class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

Project 2 Argument Analysis & Evaluation

Curious Paradox

For Module 2, you engaged with two arguments (Beyond Food w/the Hepworth review, Ludwig) that relate to the two arguments from Module 1 (Kirshenbaum & Buhler, and Taubes) on diet, exercise and health and crossing various genres. The issues are curious since an individualistic self-sufficient culture like America’s should not have epidemics like obesity. All of these arguments are consistent with our common underlying assumptions of American cultural individualism, which implies personal responsibility. However, Beyond Food makes a bold claim that the new methods for health embrace collective well-being and individualized health. How reasonable is it to mesh the individual with the collective in our society?

Kirshenbaum and Buhler, in “Americans are Confused. . .,” insist that Americans are “disengaged or misinformed about food,” setting a problematic course for individual health as well as “our collective future” (2). They call for more scientific expertise to guide the public health discussion in order to combat misinformation and food advocacy groups. Taubes also reacts to dietary misinformation in “What Really Makes Us Fat,” by celebrating how Dr. David Ludwig’s study could shift the obesity conversation towards critiquing the “conventional wisdom” of “a calorie is a calorie.” In “Lifespan weighed down by diet,” Dr. David Ludwig also derides the official “calorie is a calorie” mantra for “exonerating the food industry” (6) from the “looming social and economic catastrophe” (2) to our collective well-being.

Which argument (Beyond Food, Kirshenbaum & Buhler, Taubes, or Ludwig) do you evaluate as being most effective for persuading the intended audience?

Prompt: Construct an essay in which you analyze (audience, development, rhetorical strategies/devices, appeals, purpose, underlying assumption) and evaluate one claim in Beyond Food. Choose from the claims by the biohackers, raw food advocates, paleo/raw advocates, forager, rancher, or composter). Select a section that (in)directly relates to the underlying assumption about individualized health and collective well-being. Compare or contrast this assumption to the way it relates to one of the arguments by Kishenbaum & Buhler, Taubes, or Ludwig.For example:

***Kirshenbaum and Buhler blame inadequate food knowledge on the voluminous noise in the marketplace, risking individual, and by extension, public health. Their solution is to elevate the contribution of science to the public health conversation, which, so far, has favored GMO solutions for solving global starvation. An assumption from the 1960’s [science based] “conventional wisdom” encouraging “low-fat, carbohydrate rich diets” (8) is criticized by Taubes. By Taubes’ logic, anyone following this diet has been subjected to the “mainstream disinformation” rallied against in Beyond Health, but it was originally intended to improve “collective well-being.” Ludwig laments “the confluence of uncertain science and special interests” (6) for a food system that wrongly just blames obesity on the individual, who has likely been adhering to public health notions like “a calorie is a calorie.” Ludwig calls for policy that will prioritize collective health.***

Evaluate which of your two arguments (Beyond Food section or one by K&B/T/L) is more effective at persuading the intended audience and why.

Where to start brainstorming: Decide what claim from Beyond Food you want to analyze and evaluate. from beyond food, choose biohacking. (video for Beyond Food is the last link at the bottom) Then choose an argument by K&B/T/L (links are on the bottom for the two articles) to evaluate in comparison to Beyond Food. Analyze the rhetorical strategies for your Beyond Food claim, and add a focus to the part you will use to discuss an underlying assumption regarding individualized health and collective well-being.

Your main claim may be as simple as:

“In this essay, I will analyze and evaluate one claim in Beyond Food, and I will briefly analyze then evaluate an argument by K&B/T/L, whose underlying assumption aligns/conflicts with that in Beyond Food.”

Or you can get fancy with something like:

On the other hand, the underlying assumption in Beyond Food that health is unique to individuals conflicts with the view of Kirshebaum and Buhler that science-based knowledge needs to influence the public discussion about food.

Criteria for Evaluation: Successful papers will accomplish the following tasks in 6 well-developed, non-repetitious paragraphs:
Describe for a reader unfamiliar with these texts the common food related health issues. Create a smooth transition to your introduction of Beyond Food. Provide an accurate and complete introduction to Beyond Food and briefly introduce your one other argument by K&B/T/L. End your introduction with a clear main claim that sets up your analysis. See the examples above. {1st paragraph} In one paragraph, introduce Beyond Food’s argument with a modified rhetorical précis and audience analysis to include one piece of evidence from the film to show your own reader who the intended audience must be. {2d paragraph} Analyze one claim in Beyond Food, addressing the following tasks in an appropriate order (you need not confine each to a single sentence): clearly identify one dependent claim; hint at some of the major support (development) for this claim; identify and label the evidence and reasons used to support this claim (this evidence should connect in some way to your underlying assumption); name one appeal being used with this development (ethos/logos/pathos) and explain how it works on the audience and how it adds power to the claim; comment on the purpose – what is hoped that the viewer will go out and do? briefly evaluate how effectively this claim will persuade the viewer. {3d paragraph} In one paragraph, sum up from your analysis, how the argument in Beyond Food is (in)consistent with an underlying assumption in our individualistic culture. {4th paragraph} Highlight this assumption from Beyond Food to connect to the assumption in the K&B/T/L argument. Introduce this argument using a modified rhetorical précis, briefly analyze part of it, and evaluate how effectively it persuades its intended reader. {5th paragraph} Conclude by referring back to what you focused on for the Beyond Food argument and combine your conclusion from your analysis of the K&B/T/L. Indicate for your reader what might be significant to him or her regarding food and lifestyle decisions. Highlight what new awareness or knowledge you want your own reader to gain after reading your essay. For example, do we leave health up to the individual and “free market” or do we shore it up through public health institutions? {6th paragraph} Support your argument using examples of strategies and appeals (direct and indirect quotes) from the text. Always provide direct follow-up discussion and analysis of every quote to establish its relevance to your larger point. Maintain paragraph unity in your paragraphs. Each paragraph should focus on one main analytical idea that is illustrated with short integrated quotes from the text. Each quote and example should be followed or preceded by your analysis and commentary. Use active and rhetorically accurate verbs (see list in the rhetorical précis document in Module 2 Readings). Support your analysis with direct evidence from the texts. When you make a claim, back it up with textual evidence and supporting examples. Avoid unsubstantiated claims, vague references to the texts and generic sentences. Cite quotations and paraphrased material as follows using the paragraph number where possible in parentheses immediately after the quote (##). Be thoroughly edited on the final draft so that sentences are readable & appropriate for academic papers (no unnecessary wordiness and few simple sentences). Write your own argument for an audience of SDSU kinesiology graduate students.
Learning Outcomes:
Evaluate complex print, digital, and multimodal texts that engage significant academic, professional, or civic issues; Analyze and apply rhetorical principles appropriate to different purposes and goals, within specific disciplinary, professional and civic communities; Research and contribute to specific areas of inquiry by evaluating, synthesizing, and integrating strategies and sources appropriate to genre; Adapt and employ conventions to communicate with diverse audiences who are members of or affected by a specific area or discipline; Compose texts reflecting the above descriptors, working individually and collaboratively, through processes of drafting, critiquing, reflecting and editing.
http://theconversation.com/americans-are-confused-about-food-and-unsure-where-to-turn-for-answers-survey-shows-82124

https://sdsu.kanopy.com/video/beyond-food

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services