Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
Question Description
Recommendation
The instructor recommends allotting 300 minutes to complete this assignment. Time Recommendation: 180 minutes to read the academic journal article and 120 minutes to write and edit the 2-page review. This is only a recommendation, you may spend more or less time on this assignment depending on your ability and availability.
Introduction
Historians love to review the works of other historians. Whenever a new history book is written, the historical profession selects experts in particular fields of studies to determine the value and contribution the new work will have on the academic discipline. Upon completion of the course’s reading, each student will be considered an expert and be required to read an academic article and submit a 2-page review (minimum). Students are encouraged to celebrate the author’s accomplishments, but also challenge anything that seems substandard. Style and creativity play a crucial role in the success of your review.
Pick one of the Academic Journal Articles below:
Antigay Prejudice and the 1979 Backlash against Disco.pdf
Birth Control and the Black Community in the 1960s.pdf
Bloody Christmas and the Irony of Police Professionalism.pdf
Chinese American Women Defense Workers.pdf
Diet and Masculinity in Postwar America.pdf
Japanese Americans and Racism in CA Impact WWII.pdf
Lincoln and Eleanor Ragsdale, Collaboration, and Community Activism in Phoenix.pdf
McCarthyism, Mexican Americans, and the Los Angeles Committee for Protection.pdf
Remembering a Vietnam War Firefight.pdf
Ronald Reagan and Student Unrest in California.pdf
Format
Two pages (minimum)
12 point font
Double spaced
Paragraphs
Each paper should include the following:
The author’s purpose in writing the article
The author’s main thesis
The author’s challenging of other historical viewpoints
The evidence utilized by the author (specifically primary sources)
Personal likes/dislikes
How could the author make the work stronger?
The recommended audience for the article?
Explain how this article contributes to understanding the history of the United States
An example of how this article supports/contradicts Eric Foner’s Give Me Liberty
Suggested reading to accompany this work (not required, but helpful)
Helpful Information
Click here for a step by step guide to writing a successful AJA Review
Click here to discover the difference between a primary and secondary source.
Instructions for Submitting
On the right-hand side of the screen click on the icon that says “SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT”
Click on the tab “File Upload” to attach your AJA Review.
Click on the tab “Text Entry” if you wish to copy and paste OR write your review in the box provided.
Be sure to click “SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT” after you finishing uploading the document. If you need help converting pages click on this link.
Rubric
The AJA Rubric (1) (1)
The AJA Rubric (1) (1)
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePage and Format Requirement
30.0 pts
Meets minimum page requirement (2 full pages).
5.0 pts
Does not meet minimum page requirement (1.5 pages or less)
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAJA Requirements and Quality
30.0 pts
Answers the specific AJA requirements. Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.
25.0 pts
Answers most of the AJA requirements, however, may miss one of the following (thesis, purpose, relationship to history, or target audience). Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.
20.0 pts
Answers many of the AJA requirements, however, missed more than one of the following (thesis, purpose, relationship to history, or target audience). Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.
15.0 pts
May have met all the AJA requirements, however did not incorporate pertinent and detailed information from the scholarly work and/or sidetracked off into a reactionary tangent. Presents information in a manner that is sometimes unclear, and/or has significant organization problems. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.
10.0 pts
May have met all the AJA requirement, however did not incorporate pertinent and detailed information from the scholarly work and/or sidetracked off into a reactionary tangent. Provides no information that can be understood or related to the specific topic May lack any recognizable organization May contain enough distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems to make it substantially incomprehensible.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrimary Source Identification
20.0 pts
Identified 3 specific primary sources.
15.0 pts
Identified 2 specific primary sources.
10.0 pts
Identified 1 specific primary source.
8.0 pts
Identified primary sources, but not specific.
1.0 pts
Identified the wrong source.
0.0 pts
No attempt made to identify primary sources.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTextbook Critical Analysis
20.0 pts
Support/contradict the textbook with a direct quote from textbook.
15.0 pts
Support/contradiction validated with page number or chapter reference instead of a direct quote.
10.0 pts
Support/contradiction asserted without any specific validation from the textbook using a direct quote. Does include a generalized narrative of why support/contradict the textbook.
5.0 pts
Support/contradiction asserted without any specific validation from the textbook using a direct quote. Also lacks any sort of generalize narrative of why support or contradiction was proposed.
2.0 pts
Student stated that it did not support or contradict the textbook without validation.
1.0 pts
Student obviously did not read the book so their analysis of support or contradiction is too general, too vague, and/or incorrect.
0.0 pts
No support/contradiction of the textbook.
20.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
PreviousNext
Clients' Reviews about Our Services
Client ID 45637
U.S.A
Brilliant services. I ordered a 4 page essay and it was delivered in less than 24hours with every detail intact!
Client ID 45783
U.K
Aceassignment is the way to go. The writers are humble and patient with clients. I know this after using the website for about an year
Client ID 45214
U.K
My writer did a brilliant job. Not only did she delivered the paper on time and it was superb as my professor granted me an A without any criticism
Client ID 45009
CAD
I was running late with my assignment. I run into aceassignment on google, placed my order and within less than 18 hours my page essay was delivered. Thank you Aceassignment.
Client ID 45870
U.S.A
I've been using Aceassignment for about 2 years. My writer always delivers quality work. Mind you whenever I request for a revision it's always done ASAP and free of charge
Client ID 44218
U.S.A
At first, I was scared and hesitant about using this website. Didn't know if they would deliver, but they assured me they will. And for sure they did. I will definitely continue to use their service!
Client ID 45622
U.S.A
Easy to use website. You simply give your essay's instructions, make payment and before you known it the paper is delivered to you.
Client ID 43964
U.S.A
Unlike other platforms, this website is quite cheap and the quality is high. I have them manage my whole class and everything has been smooth this far.
Client ID 41996
U.K
Thanks for the excellent job. Swift and on the subject, just the way I like it. The Support team was quite nice to me, helped me with the order placing process.
Client ID 47654
AU
They are a marvel. I love their support team, they are so polite, it’s like speaking to a butler or something. Very pleasant people and good service of course.
Client ID 45670
FRA
Thank you for the help, I took my time and ordered a 14 days long essay. It came much earlier, around 7 days after I ordered it. Oh, and it was good, of course. I like the writer who did that, will definitely use again.
Client ID 22368
US
What I received was great. I forgot to mention in the instructions field that I needed reference page and by default, there was 0 in the number of references. I was surprised to see a full-fledged reference page in my paper with relevant citations. Bravo!
Client ID 46325
U.S.A
I was bombarding him with fine tuning and he handled it professionally. Thank you I will hire again the writer
Client ID 456820
U.S.A
Provided exceptional essay writing help in a short period of time. I plan to work with writer on many more projects!
Client ID 36890
UAE
Awesome paper in such a short amount of time. Was in a jam with another service who didn't deliver, but my writer did the job correctly. I will use her again to do my essays for sure!
Client ID 41427
U.K
Pretty good essay writer. I only made a couple of adjustments. She caught some instructions for the essay writing assignment that I didn't even notice, including them which was a pleasant surprise. Definitely recommend.
Client ID 45009
CAD
It was a very long paper, but the writer followed all the instructions, and she even finished the paper 5 days before the due date. Will write an essay with her again, thanks!
Client ID 36984
U.S.A
Writer was timely and proficient. I had to ask for a revision, but I got it back quickly with no other issues. Would use this essay writing service again.
Client ID 42960
CAD
Paper writing was prepared and submitted prior to the completed request date, and there were changes made quickly after I requested. This paper writer was accurate with numbers.
Client ID 31638
U.K
The first time I ordered here and it was a success. I received my order on time and according to my instructions. Thank you!
Client ID 46041
CAD
When I first discovered this website I was hesitant on whether they will deliver a plag free paper. The support team reassured me of their plagiarism policy. In deed they kept their word as the paper I got was authentic and plagiarism free.