Review Post 1

By
Responsive Centered Red Button

Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.

Order Form

Question Description
Read the “To centralize or not to centralize?” article (Links to an external site.).A centralized IT shared services organization can add value, but adecentralized IT organization can be integrated into business units tobetter serve their unique needs. Argue either for or against acentralized, shared services organization. Then, respond to at least onestudent who took the opposite point of view, and one who took the samepoint of view as yours.
now choose anyone from two post below
1. I am in favor of a centralized, shared services organization.“Centralized” and “decentralized” are two ends of a spectrum, and most organizations are somewhere in the middle. Originally, all communications networks were centralized. Centralized IT structures typically offer larger cost-savings—especially for larger organizations.Centralization makes it possible for entire organizations to act inunison. All departments can migrate to new and cheaper technologies andcan negotiate contracts with more leverage. One good example of thisbenefit in action: federal agencies have saved $52.5 million federalagencies to date by centralizing IT with cloud services.Centralized IT organizational structures offer better IT and data security. Suchstructures allow users to maintain better control and oversight overthe data on the organization’s servers, computers and networks.Organizations and agencies in the healthcare and financial servicessectors commonly use centralized IT for these reasons.A centralized IT organization can:

Lower hardware expenses. Most companies can reducehardware costs when their servers and other networking equipment are inone location. When distributed across several locations, extra orduplicate equipment is often needed. In other words: Increasingredundancy also increases costs.
Improve productivity for IT staff. A centralizedstructure gives IT staff better oversight and can make routine taskseasier. For example, new software installations, updates and securitypatches can all be addressed from one location. In companies withdecentralized IT structures, completing these types of tasks may requirestaff to manage each separate location, which can drive up costs anddecrease productivity.
Increase purchasing power. Negotiating softwarelicenses and support contracts for an entire company gives the purchasermore power than buying for each department individually. This can leadto better contract terms and can offer additional integrations orsupport services.
Help meet industry regulations. Industry-specificregulations, such as HIPAA for healthcare providers and theSarbanes-Oxley Act for financial services, require varying degrees of ITand database centralization (usually for data-security reasons).Companies that store and process credit card information also tend tofind it easier to meet legal requirements for data security withcentralized IT systems.
Improve the flow of information. Decentralized ITstructures often lead to information silos: collections of data andinformation that cannot be easily shared across departments. CentralizedIT structures help prevent these silos, leading to betterknowledge-sharing and cooperation between departments. For example,using one central, cloud-based CRM system makes it possible for anyemployee in a company to access customer information from anywhere.

ReferencesBorowski, C. (2016, January 20). Your IT Organizational Structure: ToCentralize/Decentralize? Retrieved fromhttps://www.softwareadvice.com/resources/it-org-st… ReplyReply to Comment
2. I currently work in an organization that has a decentralizedmanagement structure and this is the structure that is my personalpreference. This type of structure allows daily operations and decisionmaking responsibilities to occur and be handled by middle and lowerlevel managers. Below is an example of a decentralized IT organizationalstructure. If you compare this illustration to the one that Sharon putin her post (she has a great argument for centralized), you can see thedifferences between the two.

Benefits of Decentralized IT Structures
Redundancy is just one of the many reasons to adopt a lesscentralized IT structure. Decentralization is a practical approach wheneach department within an organization has different IT needs andstrategies. This allows each department to select the best software andhardware needs for their specialty. Within the hospital setting in whichI work, each area required different IT resources, software, andhardware needs (Emergency Department, Radiology, Oncology, Women’sHealth, Pharmacy, Nutritional Services, etc.).
Decentralized IT organizational structures, such as the one in this example, provide several benefits, including:

The ability to tailor IT selection and configuration.When individual departments have IT decision-making power, they canchoose and configure IT resources based on their own specific needs.Each department has its own server optimized to run its own softwareplatforms. If these departments shared a centralized IT structure,they’d likely need to make some compromises.
More fail-safes and organizational redundancy.Decentralizing makes telephone networks more resilient—and it can dothe same for IT networks, too. Following our example, if each departmentmaintains its own server, one can function as the backup server in caseanother server fails.
Respond faster to new IT trends. Sincedepartments in decentralized organizations can make independentdecisions, it’s easier for them to take advantage of new technology.

An example of this would be the customer service department wantingto improve service with online live chat. In a decentralized model, itcan do so independently. In a centralized model, there’d be many morebarriers to purchase, beginning with getting buy-in from each departmentwithin the organization and from the IT department. A slow response toimplementing emerging technology trends can be a competitivedisadvantage and cause an organization to fail behind it competitors andthus failing in the long run.

References
Borowski, C. (2016, January 20). Your IT Organizational Structure:Should You Centralize or Decentralize? Retrieved from Software Advice: https://www.softwareadvice.com/resources/it-org-structure-centralize-vs-decentralize/ (Links to an external site.)
Campbell, A., Kunisch, S., & Müller-Stewens, G. (2011, June). Tocentralize or not to centralize? Retrieved from McKinsey & Company: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/to-centralize-or-not-to-centralize

How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

Clients' Reviews about Our Services