Need Help with this Question or something similar to this? We got you! Just fill out the order form (follow the link below), and your paper will be assigned to an expert to help you ASAP.
I don’t know how to handle this Philosophy question and need guidance.
The following is a journal entry a student submitted in a past semester. Note what makes this a good entry:
It is at least 150 words in length It is written clearly and understandably It shows evidence of thoughtfulness
“The design argument for God’s existence is interesting to me but I’m not sure I can fully endorse it. It argues that because there is design throughout the universe, there must be a universal designer, i.e., a god, in turn. However, when considering the endless probabilities and eons that our world has gone through, this argument is somewhat disproved. We know many different “designs” are merely adaptations, and often times we, as humans, tend to “see” a design when there is, in fact, none there (like seeing faces in electrical sockets). The design argument also does not account for entropy found in nature, and the general decline into disorder that can be found in many systems – surely a designer wouldn’t design that? Also, there are the many examples of natural disasters and tragedies that mar our world, and which place the idea of a designer in doubt. I like to relate this problem to what we read in the introduction to Philosophy Made Simple, about the Book of Job in the Bible. Even a believer in God such as Job had trouble understanding how a good and almighty God could be responsible for all the disorder happening in his own life. So again, while the design argument is interesting, I do see some problems with it, and how it could be challenged by a skeptic.”
Topic one (pick one)
Select any one of the following topics/questions to write about.
1. Which of the six big areas of philosophy described by the “Five-Minute Philosopher” is most interesting to you? What are some specific questions within each area that particularly interest you, or that you yourself have wondered about?
2. The “Five-Minute Philosopher” suggested several specific ways in which the study of philosophy has value for people living in contemporary society. Summarize what he said, and discuss whether you agree with him about this. In a time when there is such pressure to “get a good job,” does a subject like philosophy really have value? Would you require college students to take it (be honest!)
3. Plato offers some very specific ideas on what the “good life” for human beings is, and how we ought to try to conduct our lives. What are your thoughts concerning his ideas? Does he offer an ideal for living that you yourself find appealing–why or why not?
4. Do you agree with Plato that all wrongdoing is the result of ignorance? What examples help support, and/or undermine, his claim?
5. Socrates made many enemies by challenging the values of his contemporaries. Do you think this is a valuable role for someone to play in society–that is, to challenge others to think about what they are doing, and why? Can you think of any specific examples of persons who, like Socrates, have challenged society’s values, and perhaps been persecuted for this activity?
Second Topic (pick one)
1. What are your thoughts on Aristotle’s ideal of the “Golden Mean”? Is this an attractive ideal for living? Do you see any problems in putting it into practice?
2. Explain how you think any of the traditional virtues (such as courage, generosity, patience, self-discipline, forgiveness, etc.) might be put into practice in contemporary life, or in your own life. Or, what are some specific examples you can think of (from current events, your own life, literature, history) of any of these virtues put into practice?
3. What are your thoughts on Epicurus’ philosophy of hedonism? Is this an attractive ideal for living? Do you see any problems in putting it into practice?
Third Topic (pick one)
1. Explain how you could apply Stoic principles in your everyday life.
2. What are your thoughts on the problem of the freedom of the will? Do you see a way to resolve the problem?
3. What are your thoughts on the “trolley problem”? What do you think the right thing to do is? What would you personally do if you were in that situation?
4. Do you think the moral theory of utilitarianism can survive the criticisms of the textbook authors on pages 34-35?
5. Which moral theory do you prefer, utilitarianism or Kant’s ethics of duty (deontology)?Deviance ( it is a discussion)
Need help with my Sociology question – I’m studying for my class.
a.) What is Deviance? Why is it that what one might consider deviant, someone else doesn’t?
b.) Discuss your outlook on deviance. What is your idea of RANGE OF TOLERANCE (refer to figure 7.1 in the Chapter 7 power points)
IF:
“0” represents UNDERCONFORMITY (ex. murder, rapist)
“10” represents OVERCONFORMITY (ex. straight “A” student who always comes to class 1 hour early, and studies all hours of the night)
“5” & “6” represents CONFORMING to social expectations in today’s society.
c.) Provide an example of deviance and conformity for EACH number represented on the scale.
d.) Go to http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/taboo/ and find 2 clips from the show TABOO LOCKED UP ABROAD. Write about the clip you watched anddiscuss where on YOUR Range of Tolerance this behavior would fall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s117nbK1lLE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsQTqJNlpS8
Chapter 7 pp attached. One page onlEvaluate Mass Media Impact: nursing assignment help
I’m studying for my Humanities class and need an explanation.
Instructions
Evaluate: Mass Media Impact Evaluation Title: Pop Culture and Race, Ethnicity, Sexual Morality, and Gender
Bell hooks (nee Gloria Jean Watkins) is a professor and social activist who has written about feminism and popular culture. For this assignment you will watch bell hooks’ views on Cultural Criticism and Transformation in the video and read the accompanying extended transcript (Links to an external site.). (Note: there are several very difficult subjects discussed, and visual examples from movies are used to support these examples; more examples are used to further explore each of these themes throughout the remainder of this video.)
Your essay should include some discussion of the following questions:
Do you agree or disagree with hooks’ views? Support your position. Does mass media promote images of equality by leveling racial, ethnic, and gender differences or do they promote inequality through exclusion and exaggeration of difference? Does mass media reinforce the viewpoints of white, male, corporate culture or does mass allow for the authentic expression of racial, ethnic, and sexual identity? Give examples to support your position
Specifications:
Submit an 800-1000 word essay addressing the questions above.
In your essay:
Be sure to structure your essay with an introduction paragraph that includes a thesis statement, well-organized supporting paragraphs, and a conclusion that reiterates the main points of your argument. Your argument should be supported by reputable research cited in APA format both in the body of the paper and in your references section.
Helpful Resources:
Herzing University’s Tutoring and Writing Center Grammar checker and writing help: https://www.grammarly.com/ (Links to an external site.) Use the Herzing Library to search for scholarly research sources.
Reference
ChallengingMedia. (2006, October 3). Bell hooks: Cultural Criticism & Transformation [Video file]. Retrieved fromhe role parenting contributes to girls 13-15 years old aggression and anxiety in social development: my nursing assignment help
Can you help me understand this Psychology question?
The course covers a great deal of material. The purpose of the paper is to give students an opportunity to explore one developmental topic at greater depth. Your paper will be facilitated by completion of the following four milestones which are due 1 hour in advance of the start of your section’s weekly live session. They include: • Upload your proposed topic in 2NYU before the live session in Unit 2. As soon as you receive approval for your topic, begin identifying literature to learn more about it. All paper topics must be approved. • Foundational references: Due Unit 4 (5 points). Your foundational references should demonstrate that you have reviewed the empirical literature on the topic and have identified six to eight key articles on your topic. As a general rule, your final paper should include a minimum of 10 citations (eight from empirically based articles). • Outline for the paper: Due Unit 7 (10 points). An introductory paragraph or two should clearly state the purpose of your anticipated paper. Next, you should include an outline highlighting the specific sections and/ or structure of your paper. Each section should be marked by a header. Please provide two to three sentences for each section, describing what you hope to achieve. All references in the outline should be in APA format. • Final paper submitted: Due Unit 11 (15 points). The paper must be 10 pages in length (not including references), double-spaced, 12-point font, Times New Roman, and written in APA format. Writing quality, including the organization of the paper, will be graded, in addition to content. The final submission must be well written and organized without typographical, grammatical, or spelling errors, and should cover the following: o An introduction to the topic o Review of the relevant empirical literature o Clinical applications (evidence-based interventions or treatments) o Discussion of the need for further research and/or clinical interventionBook report
I’m studying for my Political Science class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?
What to do:
Read the chapters in their entirety, take notes or annotate if that helps you Read the questions, make sure you understand them and the concepts indicated before attempting a response. You MUST cite from the text in your responses. Failure to do so will result in a 5 point deduction per question/response. Find real world example(s) (e.g. web search) to use in your response, this shows me you can understand the concept enough to apply Please quote/cite properly. You should be writing at least half a page per response. No penalty for writing more 12 point font, double spaced Grading will be based on your responses and whether they reflect that you did the reading, whether you understood it properly and showed understanding through application of examples.
Chapter 6 Question (10 points) (half a page or more of writing per question/response, must cite from textbook at least once. Provide specific examples):
According to the text, what is public opinion and how it is measured? What are some issues that can arise when polling (for example problems with accuracy)? How is public opinion used in politics?
Chapter 7 Question (10 points – half a page or more, must cite from textbook at least once. Provide specific examples):
According to the text, why is voter turnout so low in the US? Do you have any examples, personal or otherwise that support that fact? What can be done to improve voter turnout in the US?
Book link:
https://openstax.org/books/american-government-2e/pages/6-introduction (chapter 6)
https://openstax.org/books/american-government-2e/pages/7-introduction
(Chapter 7)