Skip to content
Home » Accounting – Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI) – US Government Bond ETF – Portfolio Writing Assessment Answer

Accounting – Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI) – US Government Bond ETF – Portfolio Writing Assessment Answer

     1AFHEE
    Accounting Portfolio Writing Assessment Answer
    Assignment Task:
    Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI) – US Government Bond ETF
    A client of your investment company has a 2bn US$ multi-asset portfolio under management with you.  The client wants to make a significant change to the portfolio but is unsure what option from several to choose.  The choices are whether to take a constant proportion portfolio insurance (CPPI), asset liability (AL), or risk parity (RP) approach to the overall security allocation, as well as whether to automatically re-set the investment weights at each year end or to have you make discretionary and deliberate active investment changes to the portfolio based on the relative valuations of securities.
    In order to make the decision, the client asks you to perform a back-test of each different portfolio approach.  The client has set the following guidelines:
    For the CPPI back-test:

    The safe portfolio comprises only a US Government bond ETF.

    The risky portfolio has the following starting allocation: 20% emerging market equity ETF, 40% US equity ETF, 20% Europe equity ETF, 20% Japan equity ETF.

    The maximum expected loss is to be calculated using the 95% confidence level.  To calculate the maximum expected loss set the loss value at the 95% 2-tail confidence level for the whole time period.  Calculate once at the beginning. Do not recalculate each year.

    The floor to not lose is US$ 1bn.

    For the AL back-test:

    The protection portfolio starts with US$ 1bn.  Assume the investments hedge inflation and interest rate risk and will grow at an average annual 3% over time.

    The performance portfolio has the following starting allocation: 50% emerging market equity ETF, 50% world equity ETF.

    Leverage is to be used.  The maximum expected loss is to be calculated using the 95% confidence level.  To calculate the maximum expected loss set the loss value at the 95% 2-tail confidence level for the whole time period.  Calculate once at the beginning. Do not recalculate each year.

    Borrowing costs for the leverage shall be 1% per annum (ignore interest on interest).

    Show how much capital should be allocated to the performance portfolio after borrowing.

    Show how much is set aside to fund the borrowing.

    For the RP back-test:

    The portfolio will comprise the following securities: US Government bond ETF, US equity ETF, Japan equity ETF.

    Set the risk (standard deviation) weights of each security for the whole time period and do not subsequently recalculate.

    Do not use any leverage or gearing.

    Ignore security covariances when forming the risk parity security allocation.

    For the 3 approaches outlined above, calculate the following 3 back-test portfolios:

    Passive.  Set the appropriate starting allocation.  The security weights are to naturally develop over time so make no further change.  This is a passive reference portfolio, or yardstick.

    Rules-based.  The starting allocation is as 1. above.  At the close of 31st December each year, the rule is to re-set each security’s investment weight to the starting allocation.  

    Discretionary active.   The starting allocation is as 1. above.  Changes to security weights are then made according to relative valuation signals from relative valuation metrics developed by you.  You decide the relative valuation signals and rules that instruct what is to happen when there is a signal.

    Additional information
    The back-test portfolios shall commence the 1
    st
    working day of 1996.  This is proxied by close of 31/12/1995.  The back-test continues to the most recent time period for which data are available.
    The portfolio back-tests are to use the total returns in US$.
    Data are to be monthly.
    Relative valuations are to use the prices, dividends, earnings, ratios, and yields are given.
    Both capital protection and additional capital gains are desirable.
    This Accounting Assessment has been solved by our Accounting experts at TVAssignmentHelp. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

    Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

    How to create Testimonial Carousel using Bootstrap5

    Clients' Reviews about Our Services